Evaluating Long-term Outcomes of NHS Stop Smoking Services (ELONS): a prospective cohort study
Open accessAbstract
Background: NHS Stop Smoking Services (SSSs) provide free at the point of use treatment for smokers who would like to stop. Since their inception in 1999 they have evolved to offer a variety of support options. Given the changes that have happened in the provision of services and the ongoing need for evidence on effectiveness, the Evaluating Long-term Outcomes for NHS Stop Smoking Services (ELONS) study was commissioned. Objectives: The main aim of the study was to explore the factors that determine longer-term abstinence from smoking following intervention by SSSs. There were also a number of additional objectives. Design: The ELONS study was an observational study with two main stages: secondary analysis of routine data collected by SSSs and a prospective cohort study of service clients. The prospective study had additional elements on client satisfaction, well-being and longer-term nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) use. Setting: The setting for the study was SSSs in England. For the secondary analysis, routine data from 49 services were obtained. For the prospective study and its added elements, nine services were involved. The target population was clients of these services. Participants: There were 202,804 cases included in secondary analysis and 3075 in the prospective study. Interventions: A combination of behavioural support and stop smoking medication delivered by SSS practitioners. Main outcome measures: Abstinence from smoking at 4 and 52 weeks after setting a quit date, validated by a carbon monoxide (CO) breath test. Results: Just over 4 in 10 smokers (41%) recruited to the prospective study were biochemically validated as abstinent from smoking at 4 weeks (which was broadly comparable with findings from the secondary analysis of routine service data, where self-reported 4-week quit rates were 48%, falling to 34% when biochemical validation had occurred). At the 1-year follow-up, 8% of prospective study clients were CO validated as abstinent from smoking. Clients who received specialist one-to-one behavioural support were twice as likely to have remained abstinent than those who were seen by a general practitioner (GP) practice and pharmacy providers [odds ratio (OR) 2.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2 to 4.6]. Clients who received group behavioural support (either closed or rolling groups) were three times more likely to stop smoking than those who were seen by a GP practice or pharmacy providers (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.7 to 6.7). Satisfaction with services was high and well-being at baseline was found to be a predictor of abstinence from smoking at longer-term follow-up. Continued use of NRT at 1 year was rare, but no evidence of harm from longer-term use was identified from the data collected. Conclusions: Stop Smoking Services in England are effective in helping smokers to move away from tobacco use. Using the 52-week CO-validated quit rate of 8% found in this study, we estimate that in the year 2012–13 the services supported 36,249 clients to become non-smokers for the remainder of their lives. This is a substantial figure and provides one indicator of the ongoing value of the treatment that the services provide. The study raises a number of issues for future research including (1) examining the role of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) in smoking cessation for service clients [this study did not look at e-cigarette use (except briefly in the longer-term NRT study) but this is a priority for future studies]; (2) more detailed comparisons of rolling groups with other forms of behavioural support; (3) further exploration of the role of practitioner knowledge, skills and use of effective behaviour change techniques in supporting service clients to stop smoking; (4) surveillance of the impact of structural and funding changes on the future development and sustainability of SSSs; and (5) more detailed analysis of well-being over time between those who successfully stop smoking and those who relapse. Further research on longer-term use of non-combustible nicotine products that measures a wider array of biomarkers of smoking-related harm such as lung function tests or carcinogen metabolites. Funding: The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme. The UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies provided funding for the longer-term NRT study.
AI snapshot
Written from a shortened version of the paper’s full text (it is longer than we read).
TL;DR
The ELONS study combined secondary analysis of routine NHS Stop Smoking Services data with a prospective cohort to examine short- and longer-term abstinence. It found 4-week CO-validated quit rates of 34% in routine data and 41.2% weighted in the prospective cohort, falling to 7.7% weighted CO-validated abstinence at 52 weeks.
Key findings
- In the secondary analysis of routine data from 49 services (202,804 records; analysis n = 177,291), 4-week quit rates were 48% self-reported and 34% CO-validated; CO-validation rate was 74.3%. Services reached 5–10% of their local smoking populations, and estimated overall impact was 184 ex-smokers per 100,000 population.
- In the prospective cohort of 3,075 clients from nine services, 4-week CO-validated quit was 44.1% raw and 41.2% weighted; 52-week CO-validated quit was 9.3% raw and 7.7% weighted. Lost to follow-up was 22.6% at 4 weeks and 45.2% at 52 weeks, with those lost assumed to be smoking.
- Longer-term abstinence was higher with group support (aOR 3.4, 95% CI 1.7 to 6.7 vs GP/pharmacy) and one-to-one specialist support (aOR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2 to 4.6). Other predictors included older age, affluence, lower tobacco dependence, varenicline use, higher well-being, spouse/partner support, and fewer smokers in the social network.
- In the longer-term NRT element, 61.5% reported NRT use during the quit attempt, 21.5% used NRT longer than 3 months, and 8.4% still used non-combustible nicotine products at 12 months; e-cigarette use at 1 year was 2.9%. Long-term ex-smokers were more likely than relapsers to still use non-combustible nicotine (14.0% vs 3.7%).
Methods
- Observational study with two main stages: secondary analysis of routine QuitManager data from 49 English SSSs, and a prospective cohort of 3,075 clients from nine SSSs followed at baseline, 4 weeks, and 52 weeks.
- Outcomes were self-reported and CO-validated abstinence at 4 and 52 weeks, with 52-week CO-validated abstinence as the primary outcome; analyses used multilevel logistic regression at 4 weeks and single-level logistic regression at 52 weeks, with weighting to an “all cases” routine dataset.
- Additional elements included a client satisfaction survey (996 respondents), a well-being study using the WHO-5 Well-being Index, and a longer-term NRT study with saliva biomarkers (1,047 provided NRT information; 258 provided baseline and follow-up saliva samples).
Limitations
- The paper states that secondary-analysis reach estimates relied on modelled PCT smoking and population estimates, assumed a uniform 4% smoking decline, and sometimes assumed unique clients; routine data also limited SES measurement, did not disaggregate ethnicity, and included only PCTs using QuitManager.
- The paper states that prospective recruitment was the most substantial limitation: only 9% of qualifying quit attempts were recruited, consent was cumbersome, service and policy changes affected participation, and some behavioural-support comparisons were underpowered despite weighting.
- The paper also notes low postal-survey response, exploratory well-being analysis, small biomarker samples with dropout, unmeasured group effects, and local variation in data definitions/accuracy; the observational design cannot establish causality.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 111 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
In the prospective study of just over 3000 smokers attending NHS Stop Smoking Services in nine areas of England, 41.2% were biochemically validated as abstinent from smoking at 4 weeks post quit date.
“From our prospective study of just over 3000 smokers attending SSSs in nine areas of England, we found that just over 4 in 10 (41.2%) were biochemically validated as abstinent from smoking at 4 weeks post quit date.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Just fewer than 8% of smokers were still abstinent from smoking 1 year after setting a quit date.
“We found that just fewer than 8% of smokers were still abstinent from smoking 1 year after setting a quit date.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cotinine levels for those who relapsed to smoking had not changed from baseline to follow-up, irrespective of NRT use.
“Cotinine levels for smokers who had stopped at follow-up but who used NRT long term had not changed from baseline to follow-up and neither did cotinine levels for those who had relapsed to smoking (irrespective of NRT use).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Most clients who started on NRT used it for at least 8 weeks.
“Most clients who started on NRT used it for at least 8 weeks and more than one in five (21.5%) used it for longer than the standard 3 months.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Fewer than 1 in 10 participants (8.4%) were still using non-combustible nicotine products at the 12-month follow-up.
“Long-term use was relatively rare with fewer than 1 in 10 participants still using non-combustible nicotine products at the 12-month follow-up (8.4%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Long-term ex-smokers had much higher odds of still using non-combustible nicotine products at the 12-month follow-up than those who relapsed.
“Long-term ex-smokers had much higher odds of still using non-combustible nicotine products at the 12-month follow-up than those who relapsed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Concurrent use of non-combustible nicotine products among relapsers was 3.7% compared with 14.0% of continuous abstainers.
“Concurrent use among relapsers was 3.7% compared with 14.0% of continuous abstainers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Of clients followed up at 12 months, 61.5% reported that they had used NRT during their quit attempt.
“Of clients followed up at 12 months, 61.5% reported that they had used NRT during their quit attempt.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The difference in concurrent use between relapsers and continuous abstainers remained significant even after removing those who used e-cigarettes only.
“This difference remained significant even after removing those who used e-cigarettes only.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Greater levels of cotinine were associated with greater self-reported dependence.
“Greater levels of cotinine were associated with greater self-reported dependence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the secondary analysis of routine data from 49 of 150 services in England, the 4-week quit rate was 48% when self-reported data were included.
“Our secondary analysis of routine data from 49 of 150 services in England found 4-week quit rates of 48% when self-reported data were included, falling to 34% when biochemical validation had occurred.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
E-cigarettes were the most popular single product at 1 year.
“However, e-cigarettes were the most popular single product at 1 year.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
More than one in five (21.5%) clients who started on NRT used it for longer than the standard 3 months.
“Most clients who started on NRT used it for at least 8 weeks and more than one in five (21.5%) used it for longer than the standard 3 months.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In total there were 202,804 client records included in the database.
“In total there were 202,804 client records included in the database.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the secondary analysis of routine data from 49 of 150 services in England, the 4-week quit rate was 34% when biochemical validation had occurred.
“Our secondary analysis of routine data from 49 of 150 services in England found 4-week quit rates of 48% when self-reported data were included, falling to 34% when biochemical validation had occurred.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
QuitManager data were available from 49 services in England.
“Data were available from 49 services in England.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cotinine levels for smokers who had stopped at follow-up but who used NRT long term had not changed from baseline to follow-up.
“Cotinine levels for smokers who had stopped at follow-up but who used NRT long term had not changed from baseline to follow-up and neither did cotinine levels for those who had relapsed to smoking (irrespective of NRT use).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The secondary analysis found that services were reaching up to 10% of smokers in their area in the year from July 2010.
“This same analysis found that services were reaching up to 10% of smokers in their area in the year from July 2010.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The number of cases used in the bi-variable and multilevel multivariable analysis of the efficacy of the services was 177,291.
“Thus, the number of cases used in the bi-variable and multilevel multivariable analysis of the efficacy of the services was 177,291.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Few participants reported e-cigarette use at 1 year (2.9%).
“Few participants reported their use at 1 year (2.9%), although these data include smokers and non-smokers and most people had relapsed by 1 year post quit date.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There were no differences as a function of NRT use and smoking status at follow-up in baseline levels of alpha-amylase, a biomarker of stress.
“There were no differences as a function of NRT use and smoking status at follow-up in baseline levels of alpha-amylase, a biomarker of stress.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The median number of client records per PCT was 3713 (interquartile range 2101-5136).
“The median number of client records per PCT was 3713 (interquartile range 2101-5136)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among the practitioner types, clients of specialist advisers were more likely to quit than clients of other and unspecified practitioner types.
“Among the practitioner types, clients of specialist advisers were more likely to quit than clients of other (and unspecified) practitioner types.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Carbon monoxide validation rates were lowest among specialist practitioners.
“CO-validation rates were lowest among specialist practitioners.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Generally unknown and other classifications were associated with less chance of quitting than reference groups.
“Generally unknown and other classifications were associated with less chance of quitting than reference groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The results for carbon monoxide validated quit and self-report quit are mostly similar.
“The results for CO-validated quit and self-report quit are mostly similar so they are discussed simultaneously with differences alluded to.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Ethnicity was not significantly related to quitting.
“Ethnicity was not significantly related to quitting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
September, January and February appeared to be particularly successful months for setting a quit date with a Stop Smoking Service.
“September, January and February appeared to be particularly successful months for setting a quit date with a SSS.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The CO-validation rate for clients who self-reported as quit was 73.3%.
“and the CO-validation rate for clients who self-reported as quit was 73.3%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
After taking other demographic- and service-related factors into account, there was significant variation in primary care trust validation rates.
“Residuals suggest (Figure 4) that, after taking other demographic-and service-related factors into account, there was significant variation in PCT validation rates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
As age increased so did the chances of quitting.
“As age increased so did the chances of quitting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Ethnicity had no effect on carbon monoxide validation rates.
“Ethnicity had no effect on CO-validation rates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Clients who took varenicline, combination NRT or a mixture of medications were more likely to be carbon monoxide validated than those who took single NRT.
“Clients who took varenicline, combination NRT or a mixture of medications were more likely to be CO validated than those who took single NRT.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There were 157,479 clients where quit rates could be calculated (i.e. did not quit in December or June).
“and 157,479 clients where quit rates could be calculated (i.e. did not quit in December or June).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The lowest chances of self-reported quitting were found in the primary care trust ranked 1.
“The lowest chances of self-reported quitting were found in the PCT ranked 1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The CO-validated quit rate for unique clients aged ≥ 16 years was 34.5%.
“The CO-validated quit rate for these clients was 34.5%”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There were 169,909 unique clients aged ≥ 16 years altogether.
“There were 169,909 unique clients aged ≥ 16 years altogether.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the bivariable results pregnant women had the lowest quit rate.
“In the bivariable results pregnant women had the lowest quit rate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was significant variance between practitioners and between primary care trusts even after all fixed effects had been included for both self-report and carbon monoxide validated quit.
“We can safely say that there was significant variance between practitioners and between PCTs even after all fixed effects had been included for both self-report and CO-validated quit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The variance between primary care trusts appeared to halve when primary care trust deprivation was entered into the model.
“The variance between PCTs appeared to halve when PCT deprivation was entered into the model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Health-care assistants, pharmacy employees and unclassified practitioners were significantly more likely to carbon monoxide validate clients than specialist practitioners.
“Health-care assistants, pharmacy employees and unclassified practitioners were significantly more likely to CO validate clients than specialist practitioners (see Table 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Prisoners were much more likely to be carbon monoxide validated than other groups, approximately four times more likely than routine and manual workers.
“Prisoners were much more likely to be CO validated than other groups, approximately four times more likely than routine and manual workers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For intervention type, the highest chances of quitting were among clients who took part in open/rolling groups.
“For intervention type, the highest chances of quitting were among clients who took part in open/rolling groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Compared with clients with routine and manual occupations, clients with intermediate, managerial and professional occupations, the retired, home carers and prisoners were more likely to quit.
“Compared with clients with routine and manual occupations, clients with intermediate, managerial and professional occupations, the retired, home carers and prisoners were more likely to quit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Clients aged over 53 years were twice as likely to quit as those aged 30 years or under.
“Clients aged over 53 years were twice as likely to quit as those age 30 years or under.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
As age increased, carbon monoxide validation was more likely.
“As age increased, CO validation was more likely.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Of the 49 primary care trusts, 28 met the 35% target for carbon monoxide validated quitting.
“Of the 49 PCTs, 28 met this target for CO-validated quitting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There were 171,830 unique clients in the secondary analysis (unique clients could not be identified for three PCTs).
“There were 171,830 unique clients (note that unique clients could not be identified for three PCTs)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
This difference was significant for all categories except for carbon monoxide validation among practitioners who held pharmacy posts.
“This difference was significant for all categories except for CO validation among practitioners who held pharmacy posts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The fixed effects suggested that primary care trusts that were fairly, but not the most, disadvantaged were three times more likely to be carbon monoxide validated.
“The fixed effects suggested that PCTs that were fairly, but not the most, disadvantaged were three times more likely to be CO validated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Of the 49 primary care trusts, 13 achieved carbon monoxide validation rates of 85% or more.
“Of the 49 PCTs, 13 achieved CO-validation rates of 85% or more.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Two primary care trusts were estimated to have independently added over 400 ex-smokers per 100,000 population between mid-2010 and mid-2011.
“At the other end of the scale, two PCTs were estimated to have independently added over 400 ex-smokers per 100,000 population between mid-2010 and mid-2011 (Table 8).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Non-pregnant women were more likely to be carbon monoxide validated than men and pregnant women.
“Non-pregnant women were more likely to be CO validated than men and pregnant women.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Those who paid for prescriptions were more likely to quit than those who were exempt.
“Those who paid for prescriptions were more likely to quit than those who were exempt.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In general, the services had a positive impact over and above what would be expected from quitting spontaneously or with medication only.
“In general, the services had a positive impact over and above what would be expected from quitting spontaneously or with medication only.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Self-report quitters who enrolled in open groups were more likely to be carbon monoxide validated.
“Self-report quitters who enrolled in open groups were more likely to be CO validated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
There was less variance between primary care trusts and between practitioners for self-report quits than carbon monoxide validated quits.
“It is probably also safe to say that there was less variance between PCTs and between practitioners for self-report quits than CO-validated quits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The overall quit rates of the entire database without exclusions for missing data in the gender, age or practitioner type variables were 44.1% self-report and 30.7% carbon monoxide validated.
“The overall quit rates of the entire database (see Table 3) without exclusions for missing data in the gender, age or practitioner type variables were 44.1% (self-report) and 30.7% (CO validated).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Client groups where carbon monoxide validation of 85% was achieved were prisoners and clients enrolled in open groups.
“Client groups where CO validation of 85% was achieved were prisoners and clients enrolled in open groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The CO-validated quit rate of unique clients was 34.4%.
“The CO-validated quit rate of unique clients was 34.4%”
- Also stated in: § Summary of key points · plain
“The self-reported and CO-validated quit rates were 49% and 34% respectively at 4 weeks post quit date.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Summary of key points · plain
- Findingown data
Only one service was judged to have a negative impact when both carbon monoxide validated quitting and all self-report quitting were taken into account.
“However, only one service was judged to have a negative impact when both CO-validated quitting and all self-report quitting were taken into account.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Taking any medication other than single NRT increased the chances of quitting.
“Taking any medication other than single NRT increased the chances of quitting.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Primary care trust deprivation was not significantly related to quitting.
“PCT deprivation was not significantly related to quitting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Three primary care trusts did not reach the 35% target for self-report quitting.
“Three PCTs did not reach the 35% target for self-report quitting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Eligibility for paying for prescriptions and primary care trust deprivation, once extreme primary care trusts were excluded, did not significantly affect carbon monoxide validation rates.
“Eligibility for paying for prescriptions and PCT deprivation (once extreme PCTs were excluded) did not significantly affect CO-validation rates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The process of recruiting a client, seeking informed consent, asking the additional monitoring questions and collecting saliva samples added an additional 10-15 minutes to the appointment.
“This was Country Durham and Darlington, where we were able to estimate that the process of recruiting a client, seeking informed consent, asking the additional monitoring questions and collecting saliva samples added an additional 10-15 minutes to the appointment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Throughput was significantly associated with impact taking into account all self-reported quits and overall impact.
“but it was significantly associated with impact taking into account all self-reported quits and overall impact.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Clients who saw specialist practitioners had higher quit rates than those who saw other types of practitioners.
“Clients who saw specialist practitioners had higher quit rates than those who saw other types of practitioners.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
On average 184 ex-smokers per 100,000 population were added.
“and 184 ex smokers per 100,000 population were added.”
- Also stated in: § SECONDARY ANALYSIS OF ROUTINE DATA: FINDINGS · hedged
“As a result of SSS treatment, the estimated number of ex-smokers per 100,000 population was 184 from mid-2010 to mid-2011.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § SECONDARY ANALYSIS OF ROUTINE DATA: FINDINGS · hedged
- Findingown data
Throughput was not significantly associated with quitting or impact, taking into account CO-validated quits.
“Throughput was not significantly associated with quitting or impact, taking into account CO-validated quits”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
If all self-report quits were included there were 216 extra ex-smokers per 100,000 population.
“and if all self-report quits were included there were 216 extra ex-smokers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The CO-validation rate of self-report quits in the current sample was slightly better than that reported for all PCTs in 2009/10 (69%).
“This was, however, slightly better than that reported for all PCTs in 2009/10 (69%).33”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Department of Health (DH), 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The mean CO-validated quit rate for unique clients aged ≥ 16 years in the PCTs used for calculations was 36%.
“The mean quit rates for unique clients aged ≥ 16 years in the PCTs used for calculations were 36% (CO validated)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The majority (79%) of clients received one-to-one behavioural support.
“The majority (79%) of clients received one-to-one behavioural support.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
92.0% (interquartile range 89.7-94.7) of client records referred to unique clients.
“There were 92.0%(interquartile range 89.7-94.7) of client records that referred to unique clients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
If only CO-validated quits were taken into account there were 152 extra ex-smokers per 100,000 population.
“If only CO-validated quits were taken into account there were 152 extra ex-smokers”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Comparing the QuitManager prospective study extracts with the saliva samples database for the long-term NRT use study revealed further clients who had been initially recruited to the ELONS study (as they had provided saliva samples) but had been dropped from QuitManager owing to lack of progress with their quit attempt.
“Comparing the QuitManager prospective study extracts with the saliva samples database for the long-term NRT use study revealed further clients who had been initially recruited to the ELONS study (as they had provided saliva samples) but had been dropped from QuitManager owing to lack of progress with their quit attempt.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
One-to-one behavioural support was significantly less successful than open rolling groups [aOR open groups 1.28 (95% CI 1.15 to 1.41) compared with one to one].
“This type of support was significantly less successful than open rolling groups [aOR open groups 1.28 (95% CI 1.15 to 1.41) compared with one to one].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the current sample, 74% of self-reported quits were CO validated.
“compared with 74% in the current sample.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Several sites reported a general decrease in the number of people using their service during the study period.
“Several sites reported a general decrease in the number of people using their service during the study period.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
On average 1487 unique clients set a quit date per 100,000 population.
“On average 1487 unique clients set a quit date per 100,000 population”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The median number of unique clients per PCT was 3385 (interquartile range 2169-4603).
“and the median number of unique clients was 3385 (interquartile range 2169-4603).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The mean self-report quit rate for unique clients aged ≥ 16 years in the PCTs used for calculations was 50%.
“and 50% (self-report) (Table 9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
By late July 2012 it became clear that the client recruitment rate was considerably below the level that was expected from the previous English long-term evaluation, where up to 80% of clients in the two study areas had been recruited.
“By late July 2012 it became clear that the client recruitment rate was considerably below the level that was expected from the previous English long-term evaluation, where up to 80% of clients in the two study areas had been recruited.18”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Ferguson, 2005, The English smoking treatment services: one-year outcomes, Addiction source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Two PCTs with particularly low CO-validated quit rates were reaching the highest proportion of smokers in their local area.
“Two PCTs with particularly low CO-validated quit rates were reaching the highest proportion of smokers in their local area.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Clients who chose not to answer self-assessed health and well-being questions had the lowest chances of stopping smoking.
“Interestingly, clients who chose not answer these questions had the lowest chances of stopping smoking.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
More than 40% of clients who received three of the four specialist types of behavioural support (closed group, open group, and one to one) were CO validated as quit.
“more than 40% of clients who received three of the four 'specialist' type of behavioural support (closed group, open group, and one to one) were CO validated as quit”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Mental health conditions were about twice as common among clients claiming sickness or unemployment benefits as among clients overall (29% compared with 15%; p < 0.001).
“Mental health conditions were about twice as common among clients claiming sickness or unemployment benefits as among clients overall (29% compared with 15%; p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Clients receiving group-based treatment were more likely to have good levels of well-being than those receiving one-to-one treatment (51-55% vs. 41-44%; p < 0.001).
“Clients receiving group-based treatment were more likely to have good levels of well-being than those receiving one-to-one treatment (51-55% vs. 41-44%; p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Those who had used some sort of support in their previous quit attempt (e.g. varenicline or the SSS) were significantly more likely to quit than those who had not (33% vs. 46%; p = 0.003).
“Those who had used some sort of support in their previous quit attempt (e.g.varenicline or the SSS) were significantly more likely to quit than those who had not (33% vs. 46%; p = 0.003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Short-term quit rates were higher among homeowners compared with those reporting living in rented accommodation.
“Short-term quit rates were higher among homeowners compared with those reporting living in rented accommodation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Mental health conditions were about twice as prevalent in the 45-54 years age group as in the youngest and oldest age group (20% compared with 10% and 12% respectively; p = 0.003).
“Mental health conditions were about twice as prevalent in the 45-54 years age group as in the youngest and oldest age group (20% compared with 10% and 12% respectively; p = 0.003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Clients who reported that they were married were more likely to have stopped smoking at 4 weeks (p < 0.001).
“Clients who reported that they were married were more likely to have stopped smoking at 4 weeks (p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Clients who did not provide information about support were less likely to quit: 27% compared with 43-45% (p = 0.007).
“Clients who did not provide information about this type of support were less likely to quit -27% compared with 43-45% (p = 0.007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Clients who smoked within 5 minutes of waking were least likely to quit by 4 weeks (41% compared with 42-49%; p < 0.001).
“Clients who smoked within 5 minutes of waking were least likely to quit by 4 weeks (41% compared with 42-49%; p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Pharmacy clients were less likely to be prescribed varenicline (20% of pharmacy clients were prescribed varenicline compared with ≥ 40% for the other behavioural support types; p < 0.001).
“Pharmacy clients were less likely to be prescribed varenicline (20% of pharmacy clients were prescribed varenicline compared with ≥ 40% for the other behavioural support types; p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Over half of the sample (54%) had a concerning level of well-being.
“Over a half of the sample (54%) had a concerning level of well-being.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A concerning level of well-being was more common in people who had a mental health condition (71% vs. 53%; p < 0.001).
“A concerning level of well-being was more common in people who had a mental health condition (71% vs. 53%; p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was very little difference in quit rates between the 87% who had sources of support to stop and the 11% who did not.
“There was very little difference in quit rates between the 87% who had sources of support to stop and the 11% who did not.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Medication was more likely to be recorded on three or more occasions by specialists (46% of clients who received specialist support had medication recorded compared with 36% of clients who received GP or pharmacy services; p < 0.001).
“Medication was more likely to be recorded on three or more occasions by specialists (46% of clients who received specialist support has medication recorded compared with 36% of clients who received GP or pharmacy services; p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Older clients were more likely to stop smoking at 4 weeks (69% of 65- to 85-year-olds compared with 41% of 16- to 24-year-olds; p < 0.001).
“The older a client, the more likely they were to stop smoking at 4 weeks (69% of 65-to 85-year-olds compared with 41% of 16-to 24-year-olds; p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was no significant gender difference in quitting at 52 weeks.
“but there was no significant gender difference at 52 weeks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The best 4-week outcomes were found in the managerial/professional and retired groups (65% and 69% self-report compared with 51% and 59% CO validated, respectively).
“The best 4-week outcomes were found in the managerial/ professional and retired groups (65% and 69% self-report compared with 51% and 59% CO validated, respectively).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Female participants were more likely than male participants to have other smokers in the home (43% vs. 39%; p = 0.007).
“Female participants were more likely than male participants to have other smokers in the home (43% vs. 39%; p = 0.007)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Clients with a heart, blood or circulation condition were more likely to quit than those without (51% compared with 43%; p < 0.001).
“clients with a heart, blood or circulation condition were more likely to quit than those without (51% compared with 43%; p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
From the available data, there was no relationship between reported education and CO-validated quitting.
“From the data available, there was no relationship between reported education and CO-validated quitting”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Clients of level 2 providers were less determined to quit (43% of clients who attended level 2 providers were extremely determined compared with 52% of specialist clients; p = 0.003).
“Clients of level 2 providers were less determined to quit (43% of clients who attended level 2 providers were extremely determined compared with 52% of specialist clients; p = 0.003)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
At 4 weeks post quit date, 56.6% of study participants reported that they had quit smoking.
“Overall, at 4 weeks post quit date just over a half of study participants reported that they had quit smoking (56.6%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Clients who reported paying for prescriptions were more likely to have better 4-week outcomes than those who did not (64% compared with 49% self-report outcomes).
“Clients who reported paying for prescriptions were more likely to have better 4-week outcomes than those who did not (64% compared with 49% self-report outcomes)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Fewer than 40% of clients who received behavioural support in a GP practice or pharmacy setting, or who attended a specialist drop-in, were CO validated as quit.
“fewer than 40% of clients who received behavioural support in a GP practice or pharmacy setting, or who attended a specialist drop-in were CO validated as quit”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was a relationship in the expected direction for self-report: better outcomes for clients with a degree than those with no qualifications (63% compared with 57%) (p = 0.011).
“although there was a relationship in the expected direction for self-report [i.e.better outcomes for clients with a degree than those with no qualifications (63% compared with 57%)] (p = 0.011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was not a linear relationship between cigarettes smoked per day and quitting.
“Furthermore there was not a linear relationship between cigarettes smoked per day and quitting.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Variables that did not reach statistical significance in the 4-week multivariate analyses (marital status, medical conditions, how introduced to the service) did not reach statistical significance in the multivariable model.
“Variables that did not reach statistical significance in the 4-week multivariate analyses (marital status, medical conditions, how introduced to the service) were then added to the model; however, none of these reached statistical significance in the multivariable model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Open-group clients were the most likely to be CO validated as quit (53%; p < 0.001).
“open-group clients were the most likely to be CO validated as quit (53%; p < 0.001)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Clients who had a mental health condition were less likely to quit than those without (39% compared with 45%; p = 0.014).
“clients who had a mental health condition were less likely to quit than those without (39% compared with 45%; p = 0.014)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At 52 weeks, differences in medication, dependence on tobacco, determination to quit and support from a spouse or partner did not quite reach significance.
“Likewise, at 52 weeks, differences in medication, dependence on tobacco, determination to quit and support from a spouse or partner did not quite reach significance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Specialists were more likely to see clients with a mental health condition (16% of specialist clients compared with 12% of level 2 clients; p = 0.041).
“mental health condition (16% of specialist clients compared with 12% of level 2 clients; p = 0.041)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Over half already knew of their SSS because they had made a previous quit attempt (53%).
“Over half already knew of their SSS because they had made a previous quit attempt (53%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Less-disadvantaged people had a quit rate of 10.3% (95% CI 8.4% to 12.7%) compared with a quit rate of 6.2% (95% CI 5.0% to 7.7%) among more-disadvantaged people.
“Less-disadvantaged people had a quit rate of 10.3% (95% CI 8.4% to 12.7%) compared with a quit rate of 6.2% (95% CI 5.0% to 7.7%) among more-disadvantaged people.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cessation at 4 weeks was associated with affluence, aOR 1.3 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.6).
“affluence, aOR 1.3 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.6)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The overall profiles of the ELONS study clients' behavioural support types strongly reflected 'all cases' behavioural support types.
“The overall profiles of the ELONS study clients behavioural support types, however, strongly reflected 'all cases' behavioural support types.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Participants represented a small proportion of those who accessed SSSs in the study areas during the recruitment period.
“these participants represented a small proportion of those who accessed SSSs in the study areas during the recruitment period.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A much lower proportion of combination NRT users achieved abstinence at 4 weeks (27% quit compared with 42% of people who took single NRT).
“In fact, a much lower proportion were likely to achieve abstinence at 4 weeks (27% quit compared with 42% of people who took single NRT).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Only two-thirds of people seen in a GP practice by a health-care practitioner who claimed to be quit were actually validated to be so.
“Only two-thirds of people seen in a GP practice by a health-care practitioner who claimed to be quit were actually validated to be so.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Cessation at 4 weeks was associated with white (non-British) compared with Asian, aOR 2.5 (95% CI 1.1 to 5.5).
“white (non-British) compared with Asian, aOR 2.5 (95% CI 1.1 to 5.5)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Cessation at 4 weeks was associated with determination to quit, aOR 2.3 (95% CI 1.7 to 3.0).
“determination to quit, aOR 2.3 (95% CI 1.7 to 3.0)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Quit rates were similar regardless of the route by which people got to the service.
“The quit rates were similar regardless of the route by which people got to the service.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Clients who gave a saliva sample were significantly less likely to quit at 4 weeks.
“These clients were significantly less likely to quit at 4 weeks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
If just looking at periods when the specialists and level 2 providers were actually recruiting, 9% of quit attempts were included in the ELONS study.
“if we just look at periods when the specialists and level 2 providers were actually recruiting, 9% of quit attempts were included in the ELONS study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Specialists were more likely to see permanently sick/unemployed clients (23% of specialist clients compared with 14% of level 2 clients; p < 0.001).
“permanently sick/unemployed (23% of specialist clients compared with 14% of level 2 clients; p < 0.001)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The youngest age groups were most likely to be introduced through friends and family (22% compared with 11% or below for the other age groups; p < 0.001).
“The youngest age groups were most likely to be introduced through friends and family (22% compared with 11% or below for the other age groups; p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Only 5% of clients had heard about the service through marketing.
“Only 5% of clients had heard about the service through marketing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The 'all cases' database contained quit attempts with quit dates at the nine study sites from March 2012 to March 2013 (n = 71,800).
“The 'all cases' database contained quit attempts with quit dates that took place at the nine study sites from March 2012 to March 2013 (the months where any ELONS study client set a quit date; n = 71,800).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Quit rates were higher among those who were more determined to quit.
“However, quit rates were higher among those who were more determined to quit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Combination NRT varied between 66% and 3% between study sites (p < 0.001).
“Combination NRT varied between 66% and 3% between study sites (p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The more occasions that medication was recorded as being taken, the more likely clients were to quit [68% who had medication recorded on three or more occasions quit compared with 26% who took medication on one or two occasions and 17% where medication was not recorded (p < 0.001)].
“the more occasions that medication was recorded as being taken, the more likely clients were to quit [68% who had medication recorded on three or more occasions quit compared with 26% who took medication on one or two occasions and 17% where medication was not recorded (p < 0.001)]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Clients who received group support had significantly higher quit rates, 12.1% (95% CI 10.5% to 13.8%), compared with clients who received support from a GP practice or pharmacy service, 5.1% (95% CI 2.8% to 9.3%).
“Clients who received group support had significantly higher quit rates, 12.1% (95% CI 10.5% to 13.8%) compared with clients who received support from a GP practice or pharmacy service, 5.1% (95% CI 2.8% to 9.3%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Men were more likely to be introduced by referral from a GP practice (21% compared with 17% of women; p < 0.001).
“Men were more likely to be introduced by referral from a GP practice (21% compared with 17% of women; p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Cessation at 4 weeks was associated with lower dependence on tobacco, aOR 1.3 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.5).
“lower dependence on tobacco, aOR 1.3 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.5)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Most clients (87%) were seen by a specialist practitioner.
“Most clients (87%) were seen by a specialist practitioner.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The more sessions a client attended, the better the 4-week outcome (97% of clients who attended at least nine sessions reported a quit at 4 weeks compared with just 16% of clients who attended two sessions; p < 0.001).
“The more sessions a client attended, the better the 4-week outcome (97% of clients who attended at least nine sessions reported a quit at 4 weeks compared with just 16% of clients who attended two sessions; p < 0.001)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Differences in medication, dependence on tobacco, social network and support from a spouse or partner did not reach significance for short-term quit rates.
“Differences in medication, dependence on tobacco, social network and support from a spouse or partner did not reach significance for short-term quit rates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Varenicline was the most common type of medication (43% used at least once).
“Varenicline was the most common type of medication (43% used at least once).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Clients who attended open groups were significantly more likely to quit than clients who attended specialist one-to-one sessions.
“Clients who attended open groups were significantly more likely to quit than clients who attended specialist one-to-one sessions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Cessation at 4 weeks was associated with attending services in the New Year, aOR 1.5 (95% CI 1.1 to 2.2).
“Cessation at 4 weeks was associated with: attending services in the New Year, aOR 1.5 (95% CI 1.1 to 2.2)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the longer term, at 52 weeks, quit rates were higher among older people [mean age of quitters 46.8 years (95% CI 44.4 to 49.2 years) compared with a mean age of 43.3 years (95% CI 42.5 to 44.1 years) for non-quitters].
“In the longer term, at 52 weeks, quit rates were higher among older people [mean age of quitters 46.8 years (95% CI 44.4 to 49.2 years) compared with a mean age of 43.3 years (95% CI 42.5 to 44.1 years) for non-quitters].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Quit rates were higher among those whose social network was less populated with smokers, 9.1% (95% CI 7.5% to 10.9%) compared with 3.4% (95% CI 2.6% to 4.4%).
“Quit rates were higher among those whose social network was less populated with smokers, 9.1% (95% CI 7.5% to 10.9%) compared with 3.4% (95% CI 2.6% to 4.4%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Clients with higher levels of well-being when they began their quit attempt were more likely to quit than those with lower well-being [mean well-being score was 59.3 out of 100 (95% CI 56.5 to 62.1) compared with 52.7 out of 100 (95% CI 51.4 to 53.9) for non-quitters].
“Clients with higher levels of well-being when they began their quit attempt were more likely to quit than those with lower well-being [mean well-being score was 59.3 out of 100 (95% CI 56.5 to 62.1) compared with 52.7 out of 100 (95% CI 51.4 to 53.9) for non-quitters].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Specialists were more likely to see clients with a higher proportion of smokers among friends and family (23% compared with 16% all or most of friends and family smoke; p = 0.031).
“higher proportion of smokers among friends and family (23% compared with 16% all or most of friends and family smoke; p = 0.031).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Clients of level 2 providers were less likely to have a heart/blood/circulation condition (2% of level 2 clients compared with 8% of specialist clients; p = 0.002).
“and were less likely to have a heart/blood/circulation condition (2% of level 2 clients compared with 8% of specialist clients; p = 0.002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Cessation at 4 weeks was associated with support from a spouse or partner, aOR 1.3 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.5).
“support from a spouse or partner, aOR 1.3 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.5)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Cessation at 4 weeks was associated with older age, aOR 1.032 (95% CI 1.026 to 1.039).
“older age, aOR 1.032 (95% CI 1.026 to 1.039)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Cessation at 4 weeks was associated with higher levels of well-being, aOR 1.004 (95% CI 1.000 to 1.007).
“higher levels of well-being, aOR 1.004 (95% CI 1.000 to 1.007)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Cessation at 4 weeks was associated with taking varenicline, aOR 1.6 (95% CI 1.4 to 1.9).
“taking varenicline, aOR 1.6 (95% CI 1.4 to 1.9)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
There were marked variations in medication type and frequency by study site.
“There were marked variations in medication type and frequency by study site.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
5% of qualifying quit attempts that were made in the nine study sites were included in the ELONS study.
“Thus, 5% of qualifying quit attempts that were made in the nine study sites were included in the ELONS study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Clients who attended open groups had the highest ORs of quitting in the short term at 4 weeks, aOR 1.5 (95% CI 1.0 to 2.2).
“clients who attended open groups had the highest ORs of quitting in the short term, at 4 weeks, aOR 1.5 (95% CI 1.0 to 2.2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
People who used combination NRT were no more likely to quit than those using a single form of NRT.
“People who used combination NRT (taking two or more forms of NRT in the same week and never single NRT) were no more likely to quit than those using a single form of NRT.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Specialists were more likely to see clients with high dependency on tobacco (6% of specialist clients compared with 5% of level 2 clients scored highest on dependence and 5% of specialist clients compared with 6% of level 2 clients scored lowest on the dependence scale; p = 0.007).
“high dependency on tobacco (6% of specialist clients compared with 5% of level 2 clients scored highest on dependence and 5% of specialist clients compared with 6% of level 2 clients scored lowest on the dependence scale (p = 0.007)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The Glasgow evaluation had a lower CO-validated quit rate than the ELONS study.
“The Glasgow evaluation had a lower CO-validated quit rate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
95% of CO-validated quitters vs 91% of quit but not CO validated had a CO-validation test at each session.
“Carbon monoxide-validated quitters were slightly more likely to state that they had a CO-validation test at each session than those quit but not CO validated (95% vs. 91%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The highest level of satisfaction with supportiveness was among respondents who attended open groups (70% very satisfied).
“The highest level of satisfaction with supportiveness was among respondents who attended open groups (70% very satisfied).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
About half the sample were recorded as only taking medication on one occasion.
“In addition, about half the sample were recorded as only taking medication on one occasion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
88% of quitters vs 79% of non-quitters felt they would be welcomed back.
“Although the majority of respondent's thought they would be welcomed back, quitters were slightly more likely to say they would be welcomed (88% vs. 79%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Helpfulness of information about medication was lower in site 1 (84%) than other sites (or site groups) analysed where over 90% agreed that information about medication was helpful.
“Helpfulness of information about medication was lower in site 1 (84%) than other sites (or site groups) analysed where over 90% agreed that information about medication was helpful.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
96% of respondents would recommend the SSS to other smokers who want to stop smoking.
“In addition, nearly all respondents (96%) said that they would recommend the SSS to other smokers who want to stop smoking.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Clients whose quit attempt began in the New Year were more likely to quit than those who started during the summer holiday period, aOR 1.7 (95% CI 1.0 to 2.9).
“Clients whose quit attempt began in the New Year were more likely to quit than those who started during the summer holiday period, aOR 1.7 (95% CI 1.0 to 2.9).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Number of occasions on which NRT was recorded did not have a significant impact on quit rates.
“Number of occasions on which NRT was recorded did not have a significant impact on quit rates”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
94% of quitters vs 90% of non-quitters reported being given written information.
“The majority of respondents were given written information, however, those who had stopped smoking by 4 weeks were slightly more likely to report that they had been given written information (94% vs. 90%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Clients who at any point took more than one form of NRT on one occasion (combination NRT) were significantly less likely to quit at 4 weeks.
“Clients who at any point took more than one form of NRT on one occasion (thus combination NRT) were significantly less likely to quit at 4 weeks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Adherence was much more strongly associated with cessation at 4 weeks than at 52 weeks.
“Adherence was much more strongly associated with cessation at 4 weeks than 52 weeks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Starting a quit attempt while taking varenicline is associated with 1-year abstinence, aOR 1.7 (95% CI 1.3 to 2.3).
“Starting a quit attempt taking varenicline was also associated with abstinence in the longer term, aOR 1.7 (95% CI 1.3 to 2.3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
89% were satisfied or very satisfied with support from SSS staff.
“Respondents were either satisfied or very satisfied with support from SSS staff (89%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Similar proportions of clients taking varenicline were recorded taking medication on one or two occasions and on three or more occasions.
“Similar proportions were recorded taking varenicline on one or two occasions and three or more occasions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
86% found having their CO checked at every visit helpful or very helpful.
“Finally, 86% found having their CO checked at every visit helpful or very helpful.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was no evidence that men were more likely to maintain abstinence than women.
“There was no evidence that men were more likely to maintain abstinence than women.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The vast majority of clients who quit at 4 weeks attended for four sessions.
“Note that the vast majority of clients who quit at 4 weeks did attend for four sessions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For every year of age, clients were more likely to quit, aOR 1.011 (95% CI 1.002 to 1.020).
“For every year of age, clients were more likely to quit, aOR 1.011 (95% CI 1.002 to 1.020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The odds of quitting were twice as high for clients who received support on a one-to-one basis from a specialist adviser, aOR 2.3 (95% CI 1.2 to 4.6).
“the odds of quitting were twice as high for clients who received support on a one-to-one basis from a specialist adviser, aOR 2.3 (95% CI 1.2 to 4.6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Having a social network with fewer smokers is associated with higher odds of quitting, aOR 2.0 (95% CI 1.4 to 2.9).
“Clients whose social network included fewer smokers were more likely to quit, aOR 2.0 (95% CI 1.4 to 2.9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Positive feedback was more likely among quitters than non-quitters.
“Perhaps not surprisingly, positive feedback was more likely among 'quitters' (i.e.respondents who had a successful quit attempt at 4 weeks) than 'non-quitters'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Only 9% of all service clients in the nine study areas were recruited.
“Only a small proportion (9%) of all service clients in the nine study areas were recruited.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
87% of CSS respondents were very satisfied or satisfied with the SSS overall.
“Clients were asked for their overall opinion of the SSS, with 87% saying they were either very satisfied or satisfied.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Quit rates of clients who took varenicline on three or more occasions were significantly higher than the quit rates of clients who took combination NRT on one to two occasions or clients who took single NRT on three or more occasions.
“Quit rates of clients who took varenicline on three or more occasions were also significantly higher than the quit rates of clients who took combination NRT on one to two occasions or clients who took single NRT on three or more occasions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Taking stop smoking medication and attending support sessions (adherence) was significantly associated with smoking cessation, more so at 4 weeks than at 1 year.
“Taking stop smoking medication and attending support sessions (described here as 'adherence') was significantly associated with smoking cessationmore so at 4 weeks than at 1 year.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Clients who took varenicline on three or more occasions were significantly more likely to quit than clients who took varenicline on one or two occasions.
“but clients who took varenicline on three or more occasions were significantly more likely to quit than clients who took varenicline on one or two occasions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
73% of quitters vs 63% of non-quitters found the CO test very helpful.
“Among those who had taken a CO-validated test at each session (see Table 34), quitters were more likely to say it was very helpful than non-quitters (73% vs. 63%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
96% of quitters said they would return compared with 89% of non-quitters.
“There was a small but significant difference: 96% of quitters said they would return compared with 89% of non-quitters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The individual practitioner had a significant influence, at least on short-term quit rates.
“Both the ELONS study secondary analysis and prospective data sets revealed that the individual practitioner had a significant influence, at least on short-term quit rates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
87% of respondents were very satisfied or satisfied with the support received.
“Satisfaction with the support received was also high; 87% of respondents were either very satisfied or satisfied with the support they received.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
CO-validated quitters were slightly more likely to be very satisfied with the services overall (64% vs 51%).
“Those who were CO validated as having stopped smoking were slightly more likely to be very satisfied with the services overall (64% vs. 51%)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Lower tobacco dependence is associated with significantly higher odds of quitting at 1 year, aOR 1.5 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.9).
“Clients who were less dependent on tobacco were significantly more likely to quit, aOR 1.5 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
31% were contacted by the SSS before their first appointment to encourage and motivate them to attend.
“One-third (31%) were contacted by the SSS before their first appointment to encourage and motivate them to attend”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
More-affluent clients were more likely to have stopped smoking at 1 year, aOR 1.4 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.9) than less-affluent clients.
“More-affluent clients were more likely to have stopped smoking at 1 year, aOR 1.4 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.9) than less-affluent clients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
96% of quitters vs 89% of non-quitters found information about medication helpful.
“Of those who had stopped smoking, 96% found information about medication helpful compared with 89% of those who had not.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Compared with clients who received support from either a GP practice or pharmacy service, the odds of quitting were three times higher for those who received group support, aOR 3.4 (95% CI 1.7 to 6.7).
“Compared with clients who received support from either a GP practice or pharmacy service, the odds of quitting were three times higher for those who received group support, aOR 3.4 (95% CI 1.7 to 6.7)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Higher well-being is associated with increased odds of 1-year smoking abstinence, with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.007 per 1-point increase on the well-being scale (95% CI 1.0003 to 1.013).
“Clients who had higher levels of well-being were more likely to be abstinent from smoking at 1 year.Thus for every increase of 1 on the well-being scale (range 0-100), clients were more likely to be non-smokers, aOR 1.007 (95% CI 1.0003 to 1.013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The majority of clients who took either only single NRT or only combination NRT were recorded taking medication on one or two occasions.
“The majority of clients who took either only single NRT or only combination NRT were recorded only taking medication on one or two occasions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Cessation at 4 weeks was associated with low levels of smoking among friends and family, aOR 1.2 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.5).
“or low levels of smoking among friends and family, aOR 1.2 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Support from a spouse or partner for the quit attempt is associated with significantly higher odds of 1-year abstinence, aOR 1.4 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.8).
“Clients whose quit attempt was supported by a spouse or partner were significantly more likely to be abstinent at 1 year, aOR 1.4 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Drop-off from attending sessions among ELONS clients was steady, with a little over 10% of the sample not returning following each session.
“As Table 23 shows, drop-off among the ELONS study clients from attending sessions was steady: a little over 10% of the sample did not return following each session.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The difference between men and women in 4-week cessation was not significant.
“The difference between men and women was not significant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
68% of quitters were very satisfied with staff supportiveness versus 54% of non-quitters.
“Of the quitters, 68% were very satisfied with staff supportiveness versus 54% of non-quitters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
High SES was associated with baseline well-being; the most affluent clients had well-being scores 4 points higher than the most disadvantaged clients.
“Other factors with significant associations with well-being at baseline were high SES, with the most affluent clients having well-being scores that were 4 points higher than the most disadvantaged clients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Site 8 clients were most likely to be unsure about CO validation or find it unhelpful (13% vs 9% average in other sites).
“Clients in site 8 were most likely to say that they were unsure about CO validation or they found it unhelpful or very unhelpful (13% compared with an average of 9% in all other sites).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Clients who arrived at the SSS and who had higher levels of well-being at the start of their quit attempt were significantly more likely to be non-smokers at 4 weeks and 52 weeks.
“Clients who arrived at the SSS and who had higher levels of well-being at the start of their quit attempt were significantly more likely to be non-smokers at 4 weeks and 52 weeks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The WHO-5 Well-being Index is a valid measure of well-being.
- Findingown data
Clients who did not manage to quit for 4 weeks had lower well-being at baseline than those who quit.
“Clients who did not manage to quit for 4 weeks had lower well-being at baseline than those who quit (Figure 7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Age had a U-shaped relationship with well-being, where well-being was poorest in those aged 45-54 years compared with clients aged 16-24 years and 65-85 years.
“Age had a U-shaped relationship with well-being, where well-being was poorest in those aged 45-54 years compared with clients aged 16-24 years and 65-85 years.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Attrition in the well-being scores of clients with an absence of mental health conditions was particularly marked when the item 'I feel in control' was added to the model.
“Attrition in the well-being scores of clients with an absence of mental health conditions was particularly marked when the item 'I feel in control' was added to the model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The mean well-being at baseline of 52-week quitters was higher than those who did not manage to quit for 52 weeks.
“In addition, the mean well-being at baseline of 52-week quitters was higher than those who did not manage to quit for 52 weeks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Clients aged 45 to 54 years had lower well-being scores than younger and older clients at all three time points, although differences were not always significant.
“Clients aged 45 to 54 years had lower well-being scores than younger and older clients at all three time points, although differences were not always significant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The WHO-5 Well-being Index is a valid measure of well-being.
- Findingown data
At 1 year after the quit date, only the ontological security items and being abstinent from smoking at 52 weeks were associated with well-being.
“At 1 year after the quit date, only the ontological security items [I enjoy a challenge, I can do what I want when I want, I feel in control, I feel safe, I worry about things going wrong (reversed), I feel I'm doing well in life, My life has a sense of routine] and being abstinent from smoking at 52 weeks were associated with well-being (see Tables 38 and 47).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Analysis of client satisfaction between quitters and non-quitters, SSS location and behavioural support types revealed some small but significant differences.
“Analysis of client satisfaction between quitters and non-quitters, SSS location and behavioural support types revealed some small but significant differences:”
- Also stated in: § Satisfaction with services · plain
“Analysis of client satisfaction between quitters and non-quitters, SSS location and behavioural support types revealed some small but significant differences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Satisfaction with services · plain
- Findingown data
If ontological security items were not entered, then low dependence on tobacco, no mental health issues, and spouse and partner support were significantly associated with well-being.
“If ontological security items were not entered, then dependence on tobacco (low dependence), no mental health issues, and spouse and partner support were significantly associated with well-being”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Well-being among those who stopped smoking remained higher than that of continuing smokers at all measurement points.
“In addition, well-being among those who stopped smoking remained higher than that of continuing smokers at all measurement points.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The WHO-5 Well-being Index is a valid measure of well-being.
- Findingown data
Attrition in the well-being coefficients of the youngest and oldest clients, the highest SES groups and those who had a spouse/partner supporting their quit attempt was particularly marked when the item 'I'm doing well in life' was added to the model.
“Attrition in the well-being coefficients of the youngest and oldest clients, the highest SES groups and those who had a spouse/partner supporting their quit attempt was particularly marked when the item 'I'm doing well in life' was added to the model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For cotinine values, greater dependence at baseline was associated with an increase in cotinine levels (p = 0.047).
“For cotinine values, greater dependence at baseline was associated with an increase in cotinine levels (p = 0.047).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Long-term use was relatively rare with fewer than 1 in 10 participants still using non-combustible nicotine products at 12-months follow-up (8.4%, 95% CI 6.4% to 11.0%; n = 50).
“However, long-term use was relatively rare with fewer than 1 in 10 participants still using non-combustible nicotine products at 12-months follow-up (8.4%, 95% CI 6.4% to 11.0%; n = 50).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Of clients followed up, 61.5% (95% CI 58.4% to 64.6%, n = 583) claimed that they had used NRT during their initial quit attempt.
“Of clients followed up, 61.5% (95% CI 58.4% to 64.6%, n = 583) claimed that they had used NRT during their initial quit attempt.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Our prospective study results were broadly comparable with those from routinely collected data from services.
“Our prospective study results were broadly comparable with those from routinely collected data from services.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Baseline nicotine dependence was the only other significant predictor (p < 0.001).
“Baseline nicotine dependence was the only other significant predictor (p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Generally, there were few differences between those clients who had relapsed between the 4-week and 12-month follow-up and those who had remained abstinent in terms of their NRT use.
“Generally, there were few differences between those clients who had relapsed between the 4-week and 12-month follow-up and those who had remained abstinent in terms of their NRT use (see Figure 8a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among 3000 smokers attending SSSs in nine areas of England, just over 4 in 10 (41.2%) were biochemically validated as abstinent from smoking at 4 weeks post quit date.
“Among 3000 smokers attending SSSs in nine areas of England, we found that just over 4 in 10 (41.2%) were biochemically validated as abstinent from smoking at 4 weeks post quit date.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
After taking into account multiple comparisons, quitters who used NRT at follow-up did not differ from any other group.
“and after taking into account multiple comparisons, quitters who used NRT at follow-up, did not differ from any other group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Those who had stopped smoking at follow-up and were still using NRT had higher baseline cotinine levels than other groups.
“Those who had stopped smoking at follow-up and were still using NRT had higher levels than other groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Cessation rates identified in this study were lower at both 4 and 52 weeks than in our previous research conducted over a decade ago as part of a 'national' evaluation of the services in England shortly after they were established.
“Cessation rates identified in this study were lower at both 4 and 52 weeks than in our previous research conducted over a decade ago as part of a 'national' evaluation of the services in England shortly after they were established.17,18”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Findingown data
There was no discernible impact of either smoking status or NRT use on alpha-amylase activity.
“By contrast, there was no discernible impact of either smoking status or NRT use on alpha-amylase activity (see Figure 9b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The overall differences in baseline cotinine became barely significant when adjusting for potential confounders (age, gender, ethnicity, occupation, any medical condition and nicotine dependence; p = 0.245).
“However, these overall differences in baseline cotinine became barely significant when adjusting for potential confounders (age, gender, ethnicity, occupation, any medical condition and nicotine dependence; p = 0.245)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the longer term, fewer than 8% of smokers were still abstinent from smoking 1 year after setting a quit date with their local service.
“In the longer term, we found that fewer than 8% of smokers were still abstinent from smoking 1 year after setting a quit date with their local service.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There were no differences as a function of NRT use and smoking status at follow-up in baseline levels of alpha-amylase (p = 0.956).
“There were no differences as a function of NRT use and smoking status at follow-up in baseline levels of alpha-amylase (p = 0.956).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Over and above an expected main effect of smoking status (p < 0.001), there was a significant NRT use by smoking status interaction (p = 0.021).
“In addition, over and above an expected main effect of smoking status (p < 0.001), there was a significant NRT use by smoking status interaction (p = 0.021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
We found several examples of good practice where SSSs have offered more than they are required to do by national service standards.
“In addition, we found several examples of good practice where SSSs have offered more than they are required to do by national service standards.96”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [96] Department of Health, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Consistent with other studies, smoking cessation outcomes varied significantly between different groups of people who accessed SSSs.
“Consistent with other studies, we found that smoking cessation outcomes varied significantly between different groups of people who accessed SSSs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the ELONS sample, 6% reported using NRT at 1 year post quit date.
“with 6% of our sample reporting using NRT at 1 year and 2.9% using e-cigarettes at 1 year post quit date.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the ELONS sample, 2.9% reported using e-cigarettes at 1 year post quit date.
“with 6% of our sample reporting using NRT at 1 year and 2.9% using e-cigarettes at 1 year post quit date.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Clients who managed to stop smoking in the ELONS study and who completed the well-being survey were more likely to agree that they felt in control.
“Clients who managed to stop smoking in the ELONS study and who completed the well-being survey were more likely to agree that they felt in control.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The WHO-5 Well-being Index is a valid measure of well-being.
- Rests on an assumption: The ontological security items measure ontological security.
- Findingcitation
As other studies have found, the odds of maintaining a quit attempt increased with age.
“As other studies have found, the odds of maintaining a quit attempt increased with age.89,90”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [89] Hymowitz, 1997, Predictors of smoking cessation in a cohort of adult smokers followed for five years, Tob Control source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [90] Osler, 1998, Psychosocial, behavioural, and health determinants of successful smoking cessation: a longitudinal study of Danish adults, Tob Control source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Important differences in outcomes between forms of behavioural support were also identified.
“Important differences in outcomes between forms of behavioural support were also identified.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
GP practice clients were least comfortable with CO testing.
“GP practice clients were least comfortable with CO testing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Drop-ins did not result in as positive cessation outcomes as other types of support types.
“In addition, we found that drop-ins (i.e.where people can simply drop-in to see a SSS practitioner without an appointment) did not result in as positive cessation outcomes as other types of support types.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Positive well-being at baseline significantly predicted abstinence from smoking 1 year later.
“Positive well-being at baseline significantly predicted abstinence from smoking 1 year later.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The WHO-5 Well-being Index is a valid measure of well-being.
- Findingown data
Complete substitution of cigarettes with non-combustible nicotine products long term was just below 10% among NHS SSS clients.
“However, complete substitution of cigarettes with non-combustible nicotine products long term was less common, at just below 10%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Over one in five NHS SSS clients who achieved short-term abstinence reported continuing to use NRT beyond the standard treatment length of 3 months.
“We found that over one in five NHS SSS clients who achieved short-term abstinence reported continuing to use NRT beyond the standard treatment length of 3 months.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Concurrent long-term use of NRT among SSS clients in the study who relapsed to smoking was less than 4%.
“Concurrent long-term use of NRT among SSS clients in the study who have relapsed to smoking, reflecting partial substitution, was much lower, at less than 4%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Smokers supported to quit with specialist services (including group behavioural support and one-to-one support from a specialist) were more likely to have stopped smoking in the longer term.
“We found that smokers supported to quit with specialist services (including group behavioural support and one-to-one support from a specialist) were more likely to have stopped smoking in the longer term.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Clients who were more dependent on tobacco at baseline had lower well-being at all three time measurement points.
“Clients who were more dependent on tobacco at baseline had lower well-being at all three time measurement points.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The WHO-5 Well-being Index is a valid measure of well-being.
- Findingown data
At 1 year, a number of client characteristics were associated with either maintaining abstinence or having relapsed to smoking.
“At 1 year, for example, a number of client characteristics were associated with either maintaining abstinence of having relapsed to smoking.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Those who stopped smoking did tend to have higher well-being than non-quitters at all time points.
“Those who stopped smoking did tend to have higher well-being than non-quitters at all time points.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The WHO-5 Well-being Index is a valid measure of well-being.
- Findingcitation
More disadvantaged clients were less likely to remain abstinent from smoking at 1 year, as our previous work and that of others has shown.
“More disadvantaged clients were less likely to remain abstinent from smoking at 1 year, as our previous work and that of others has shown.18,91,92”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [18] Ferguson, 2005, The English smoking treatment services: one-year outcomes, Addiction source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [91] Hiscock, 2010, Social inequalities in quitting: what factors mediate the relationship between socioeconomic position and smoking cessation?, J Public Health source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [92] Hiscock, 2011, Socio-economic status and smoking: a review, Ann N Y Acad Sci source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Use of NRT while smoking did not appear to increase overall nicotine intake.
“The longer-term NRT study found that use of NRT while smoking did not appear to increase overall nicotine intake.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CO-validated quit rates were significantly lower among clients with a mental health condition (p = 0.014).
“| p-value | - | - | = 0.005 | = 0.014 |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
From the prospective study of just over 3000 smokers attending SSSs in nine areas of England, 41.2% were biochemically validated as abstinent from smoking at 4 weeks post quit date.
“From our prospective study of just over 3000 smokers attending SSSs in nine areas of England, we found that just over 4 in 10 (41.2%) were biochemically validated as abstinent from smoking at 4 weeks post quit date.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Smokers supported to quit with the specialist service were more likely to stop smoking in the longer term.
“For example, smokers supported to quit with the specialist service were more likely to stop smoking in the longer term.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The cross-sectional analysis did not detect a significant increase in cotinine levels among ex-smokers using NRT compared with those not using NRT.
“Although the cross-sectional analysis did not detect a significant increase in cotinine levels among ex-smokers using NRT compared with those not using NRT, the within-group analysis suggests that virtually all baseline nicotine may be replaced by NRT among long-term ex-smokers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Just fewer than 8% of smokers were still abstinent from smoking 1 year after setting a quit date with their local service.
“We found that just fewer than 8% of smokers were still abstinent from smoking 1 year after setting a quit date with their local service.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was no evidence that use of NRT (either concurrently or among ex-smokers) was associated with an increase in alpha-amylase, a biomarker of stress response used as a proxy for potential harm.
“Moreover, there was no evidence that use of NRT (either concurrently or among ex-smokers) was associated with an increase in a biomarker of stress response, alpha-amylase, used as a proxy here to signal potential harm.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Smokers who had higher levels of well-being when they first started attending services were more likely to be non-smokers at 4 weeks and 1 year later.
“We found that assessment of well-being using a standard set of questions could be included in routine monitoring and that smokers who had higher levels of well-being when they first started attending services were more likely to be non-smokers at 4 weeks and 1 year later.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the 4-week analysis, combination NRT was not as effective as other medication forms.
“This may explain some of the differences between the 4-week results that go against the findings of previous studies, 7,17 in particular our findings around combination NRT not being as effective as other medication forms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Findingown data
Our results do not suggest that NRT use leads to an increased intake compared with continued smoking.
“Our results do not suggest that NRT use leads to an increased intake compared with continued smoking.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Rolling groups resulted in better longer-term outcomes than other forms of behavioural support.
“In addition, the ELONS study builds on previous research that shows that longer-term outcomes are influenced by the type of behavioural support a smoker receivesrolling groups resulted in better outcomes than other forms of behavioural support.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Long-term NRT use was associated with continuing high cotinine levels among ex-smokers.
“In contrast, it was associated with continuing high cotinine levels among ex-smokers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Long-term use of NRT among former SSS clients who remained abstinent was not uncommon compared with concurrent use among smokers.
“Its long-term use among former SSS clients who remained abstinent was not uncommon compared with concurrent use among smokers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Quit rates increased with the number of sessions attended (p < 0.001).
“| p-value | - | - | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Concurrent use of NRT among smokers did not appear to increase their nicotine intake.
“Moreover, confirming previous research, 67,112 the concurrent use of NRT among smokers did not appear to increase their nicotine intake.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [67] Beard, 2011, Is use of nicotine replacement therapy while continuing to smoke associated with increased nicotine intake? Evidence from a population sample, Psychopharmacology source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [112] Fidler, 2011, Variation in saliva cotinine as a function of self-reported attempts to reduce cigarette consumption, Psychopharmacology source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
In adjusted analyses, having support from spouse/partner was associated with higher 4-week (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.5) and 52-week (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.8) CO-validated quit than other.
“| Support from spouse/partner | 1550 | 50.7 | 1.3 (1.1 to 1.5) | 1.4 (1.0 to 1.8) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the null model, practitioner-level variance for CO-validated quit was 0.54 (95% CI 0.51 to 0.58).
“(constant) | (0.20 to 0.53) | (0.51 to 0.58) | (0.07 to 0.20) | (0.38 to 0.43) | (1.03 to 2.63) | (1.23 to 1.42) |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In adjusted analyses, being very/extremely determined to quit was associated with higher 4-week CO-validated quit (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.7 to 3.0).
“| Very/extremely determined | 2729 | 89.3 | 2.3 (1.7 to 3.0) | Did not enter |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Across 40 PCTs, the mean self-report quit rate was 50.0% (SD 8.9%).
“| Self-report quit | 50.0% (8.9%) -0.133 0.414 | 0.505 | 0.001 | 0.735 < 0.001 | 0.675 < 0.001 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Sick/unemployed people made up a higher proportion of clients seen at a dedicated SSS shop/stall (33% vs ≤28% at other locations; p<0.001).
“l Sick/unemployed people made up a higher proportion of clients seen at a dedicated SSS shop/stall (33% of a dedicated SSS shop/stall clients were sick/unemployed compared with ≤ 28% at other locations; p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In adjusted analyses, one-to-one specialist behavioural support was associated with higher 52-week CO-validated quit than GP practice or pharmacy service (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2 to 4.6).
“| One-to-one specialist | 1131 | 37.0 | N/A | 2.3 (1.2 to 4.6) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
After including all fixed effects, practitioner-level variance for CO-validated quit was 0.49.
“| Multivariable model | 0.34 | 0.49 | 0.13 | 0.36 | 1.47 | 0.71 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among CO-verified quitters with no self-reported NRT use, 31 of 141 (22.2%) had cotinine values above the usual cut-off level of 15 ng/ml to identify smokers.
“Of the sample of CO-verified quitters with no self-reported NRT use (n = 141), this means that 31 (22.2%) had values above the usual cut-off level of 15 ng/ml to identify smokers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the prospective study, CO-validated quit rates differed significantly by self-assessment of health (p = 0.002).
“| p-value | - | - | < 0.001 | = 0.002 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Across 40 PCTs, the mean CO-validated quit rate was 35.9% (SD 9.7%).
“| CO-validated quit | 35.9% (9.7%) -0.204 0.207 | 0.845 | < 0.001 | 0.439 0.005 | 0.716 < 0.001 |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In adjusted analyses, group specialist behavioural support was associated with higher 52-week CO-validated quit than GP practice or pharmacy service (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.7 to 6.7).
“| Group specialist | 652 | 21.3 | N/A | 3.4 (1.7 to 6.7) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
After including all fixed effects, PCT-level variance for CO-validated quit was 0.34.
“| Multivariable model | 0.34 | 0.49 | 0.13 | 0.36 | 1.47 | 0.71 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In adjusted analyses, having 0-1 indicators of low SES was associated with higher 4-week (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.6) and 52-week (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.9) CO-validated quit than having 2-5 indicators.
“| 0-1 indicators of low SES | 1123 | 36.7 | 1.3 (1.1 to 1.6) | 1.4 (1.1 to 1.9) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Across 40 PCTs, the mean impact (CO validated) was 152 (SD 144).
“| Impact (CO validated) 152 (144) | 0.218 | 0.177 | 1 | - | 0.657 < 0.001 | 0.919 < 0.001 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Medical conditions were not predictors of either short- or long-term quitting.
“The analysis presented below suggests that well-being at baseline was a predictor of abstinence from smoking in the short and longer term, but medical conditions were not.”
- Also stated in: § Additional information · hedged
“This analysis suggested that none of the medical conditions variables predicted either short-or long-term quitting.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Additional information · hedged
- Findingown data
CO-validated quit rate was significantly correlated with CO-validated impact (r = 0.845, p < 0.001).
“| CO-validated quit | 35.9% (9.7%) -0.204 0.207 | 0.845 | < 0.001 | 0.439 0.005 | 0.716 < 0.001 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Well-being at baseline was a predictor of abstinence from smoking in the short and longer term.
“The analysis presented below suggests that well-being at baseline was a predictor of abstinence from smoking in the short and longer term, but medical conditions were not.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the null model, PCT-level variance for CO-validated quit was 0.36 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.53).
“(constant) | (0.20 to 0.53) | (0.51 to 0.58) | (0.07 to 0.20) | (0.38 to 0.43) | (1.03 to 2.63) | (1.23 to 1.42) |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
CO-validated quit rates differed significantly by Heaviness of Smoking Index score (p = 0.049).
“| p-value | - | - | < 0.001 | = 0.049 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Well-being at baseline approximately followed a normal distribution.
“Well-being at baseline approximately followed a normal distribution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In adjusted analyses, having half or fewer friends/family who smoke was associated with higher 4-week (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.5) and 52-week (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.9) CO-validated quit than other.
“| Half or fewer smoke | 2286 | 74.8 | 1.2 (1.0 to 1.5) | 2.0 (1.4 to 2.9) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CO-validated quit rates differed significantly by prescription charge status (p < 0.001).
“| p-value | - | - | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | - | < 0.001 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
CO-validated quit rates were significantly higher among clients with a heart/blood/circulation condition (p < 0.001).
“| p-value | - | - | = 0.017 | < 0.001 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Self-report quit rate was significantly correlated with self-report impact (r = 0.735, p < 0.001).
“| Self-report quit | 50.0% (8.9%) -0.133 0.414 | 0.505 | 0.001 | 0.735 < 0.001 | 0.675 < 0.001 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
CO-validated quit rates were significantly higher among clients who used some form of support in their latest previous attempt (p = 0.003).
“| p-value | - | - | = 0.001 | = 0.003 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Client and service characteristics were associated with well-being at baseline, 4 weeks and 12 months.
“Tables 46 and 47 present multivariable linear regression results, presenting client and service characteristics that were associated with well-being at baseline, 4 weeks and 12 months.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Well-being at baseline was a predictor of both short-term and long-term quitting.
“Well-being at baseline was a predictor of both short-and long-term quitting (see Chapters 6 and 8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A higher proportion of dedicated SSS shop/stall clients were in the youngest age group than was true for all other settings except for well-being centres (18% vs 19% well-being centre vs ≤11% at other locations; p<0.001).
“l A higher proportion of dedicated SSS shop/stall clients were in the youngest age group than was true for all other settings except for well-being centres (18% dedicated SSS shop/stall clients and 19% well-being centre clients compared with ≤ 11% at other locations; p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Findings from the study team's earlier studies with NHS Stop Smoking Services suggest that group interventions may be more effective in practice.
“Findings from our earlier studies with NHS SSSs suggest that group interventions may be more effective in practice 24 but that smokers, given a choice, will choose one-to-one support.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] McEwen, 2006, Effectiveness of specialist group treatment for smoking cessation vs. one-to-one treatment in primary care, Addict Behav source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
If the ELONS results are applied to all of England, then in the year 2012-13 the services supported 36,249 clients to become non-smokers for the remainder of their lives.
“If these results are applied to all of England, then we estimate that in the year 2012-13 the services supported 36,249 clients to become non-smokers for the remainder of their lives.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 1-year abstinence rate observed in the ELONS prospective cohort is representative of all NHS Stop Smoking Services clients in England.
- Rests on an assumption: Clients who are abstinent at 1 year will remain non-smokers for the remainder of their lives.
- Interpretationown data
In terms of smoking cessation in the short term, the ELONS findings are broadly comparable with those from routinely collected data from services.
“In terms of smoking cessation in the short term, findings are broadly comparable with those from routinely collected data from services.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 49 services providing routine data are representative of all 150 NHS Stop Smoking Services in England.
- Rests on an assumption: The nine prospective study services are representative of all NHS Stop Smoking Services in England.
- Study design and conductcitation
The analysis adhered to the Russell Standard for smoking cessation analysis by taking an intention-to-treat approach where clients with missing quit data were categorised as not quit.
“As outlined above, we adhered to the Russell Standard for smoking cessation analysis by taking an intention-to-treat approach where clients with missing quit data were categorised as not quit.30”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] West
Not checked in the free run.
- Premiseown data
A subsequent analysis by the study team found that NHS Stop Smoking Services were making a contribution to reducing inequalities in health caused by smoking.
“A subsequent analysis by our team also found that they were making a contribution to reducing inequalities in health caused by smoking.20”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Bauld, 2007, Assessing the impact of smoking cessation services on reducing health inequalities in England: observational study, Tob Control source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Smokers, given a choice, will choose one-to-one support.
“Findings from our earlier studies with NHS SSSs suggest that group interventions may be more effective in practice 24 but that smokers, given a choice, will choose one-to-one support.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] McEwen, 2006, Effectiveness of specialist group treatment for smoking cessation vs. one-to-one treatment in primary care, Addict Behav source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The most recent estimation of adult smoking rates for primary care trusts was for 2003-5, based on the Health Survey for England.
“The most recent estimation of adult (≥ 16 years) smoking rates for PCTs was for 2003-5.34 These were based on the Health Survey for England.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] NHS Information Centre, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In a review of 50 randomised controlled trials and another review of 23 studies since January 2000, a group format for a behavioural intervention was not found to be significantly different from an individual format.
“In a review of 50 randomised controlled trials 22 and another review of 23 studies since January 2000, 23 a group format for a behavioural intervention was not found to be significantly different from an individual format”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [22] Mottillo, 2009, Behavioural interventions for smoking cessation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, Eur Heart J source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [23] Lemmen, 2008, Effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions among adults: a systematic review of reviews, Eur J Cancer Prev source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Routine monitoring data are supplied as aggregated summary returns and cannot be used to analyse which factors are associated with individual-level smoking cessation outcomes.
“These monitoring data are supplied as aggregated summary returns and so cannot be used to analyse which factors are associated with individual-level smoking cessation outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Access to QuitManager data made it possible to examine individual-level information not available from the Health and Social Care Information Centre returns.
“This was important as by having access to these data made it possible to examine individual-level information not available from the Health and Social Care Information Centre returns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
All Stop Smoking Services in England are required to submit routine monitoring data to the Health and Social Care Information Centre.
“All SSSs in England are required to submit routine monitoring data to the Health and Social Care Information Centre.31”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Health and Social Care Information Centre, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Routine data provide a helpful and not inaccurate indicator of short-term smoking cessation outcomes.
“These results provide a useful indicator that (a) routine data provide a helpful and not inaccurate indicator of short-term smoking cessation outcomes and (b) services are continuing to effectively reach smokers and support them to stop.”
- Also stated in: § Chapter 11 Conclusions · hedged
“These results provide a useful indicator that (a) routine data provide a helpful and not inaccurate indicator of short-term smoking cessation outcomes and (b) services are continuing to effectively reach smokers and support them to stop.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 49 services providing routine data are representative of all 150 NHS Stop Smoking Services in England.
- Rests on an assumption: The nine prospective study services are representative of all NHS Stop Smoking Services in England.
- Also stated in: § Chapter 11 Conclusions · hedged
- Study design and conductnone given
The unique patient identifier was of poor quality for four primary care trusts.
“Additionally, the unique patient identifier was of poor quality for four PCTs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This suggested that idiosyncrasies were responsible rather than an effect of deprivation.
“This suggested that idiosyncrasies were responsible rather than an effect of deprivation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
Two primary care trusts with very high carbon monoxide validation rates and one primary care trust with a particularly low validation rate were consequently excluded.
“Two PCTs, with very high CO-validation rates and one PCT with a particularly low validation rate were consequently excluded.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
It is not currently possible to accurately estimate how much of the change in higher-level variance is caused by real changes in variance and how much is caused by the constrained level 1 variance.
“It is not currently possible to accurately estimate how much of the change is caused by real changes in variance and how much is caused by the constrained level 1 variance (Yang M, University of Nottingham, 2012, personal communication).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [37] Rasbash, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [38] Aveyard, 2004, The influence of school culture on smoking among pupils, Soc Sci Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [39] Fielding, 2004, Scaling for residual variance components of ordered category responses in generalised linear mixed multilevel models, Qual Quant source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Smokers attempting to stop with NRT and minimal behavioural support have previously been estimated to have quit rates of 25% (for CO-validated quits) and 35% (for self-reported quits) at 4 weeks.
“Smokers attempting to stop with NRT and minimal behavioural support have previously been estimated to have quit rates of 25% (for CO-validated quits) and 35% (for self-reported quits) at 4 weeks”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [33] Department of Health (DH), 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [42] West, 2013, Performance of English stop smoking services in first 10 years: analysis of service monitoring data, BMJ source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Practitioner type did make a difference for some clients, with all but the most affluent less likely to be successful if they had been treated by a nurse compared with other types of practitioners, including smoking cessation specialists [main effect aOR 0.73 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.83)].
“Practitioner type did make a difference for some clients, with all but the most affluent less likely to be successful if they had been treated by a nurse compared with other types of practitioners, including smoking cessation specialists [main effect aOR 0.73 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.83)].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Hiscock, 2013, Behavioural therapy for smoking cessation: the effectiveness of different intervention types for disadvantaged and affluent smokers, Addict Behav source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
It is possible that these PCTs were focusing on reach at the expense of achieving quits.
“It is therefore possible that these PCTs were focusing on reach at the expense of achieving quits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Overall, 787,527 people set a quit date in all English SSSs from April 2010 to March 2011.
“Overall, 787,527 people set a quit date 43”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] NHS Information Centre, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The lower CO-validation rate was likely to be the result of the CO-validation rate of self-report quits being below recommended levels (74% compared with the recommended 85%).
“The lower CO-validation rate was likely to be the result of the CO-validation rate of self-report quits being below recommended levels (74% compared with the recommended 85%).33”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Department of Health (DH), 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Affluent smokers were more likely to be abstinent from smoking at 4 weeks post quit date than disadvantaged smokers as measured by either eligibility for free prescriptions or by occupational group (as measured by the NSSEC), for example adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.38 (95% CI 1.35 to 1.42) for clients who paid for prescriptions compared with those eligible for free prescriptions.
“Results presented in the published multivariable analysis 26 showed that affluent smokers were more likely to be abstinent from smoking at 4 weeks post quit date than disadvantaged smokers as measured by either eligibility for free prescriptions or by occupational group (as measured by the NSSEC), for example adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.38 (95% CI 1.35 to 1.42) for clients who paid for prescript”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Hiscock, 2013, Behavioural therapy for smoking cessation: the effectiveness of different intervention types for disadvantaged and affluent smokers, Addict Behav source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Analysis of the number of quit dates set over the recruitment period for the ELONS study (March 2012-March 2013) suggests that this was a reality.
“Analysis of the number of quit dates set over the recruitment period for the ELONS study (March 2012-March 2013) suggests that this was a reality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Combination NRT (using more than one NRT product concurrently) was not included because it was not associated with quitting in preliminary analysis.
“Combination NRT (using more than one NRT product concurrently) was not included because it was not associated with quitting in preliminary analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
Adherence or continuing to attend SSSs could not be included in multilevel modelling because of issues with direction of causality.
“Adherenceor continuing to attend SSSscould not be included in multilevel modelling.This was owing to issues with direction of causality: it is not clear whether failure to adhere reduces the chances of quitting or whether clients relapse and then stop attending sessions and taking medication.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The ELONS sample is not representative of all service clients in those areas.
“The sample is therefore not representative of all service clients in those areas.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
CI overlap could be because of lack of power because both closed groups and pharmacies consisted only of about 100 clients.
“Thus, CI overlap could be because of lack of power because both closed groups and pharmacies consisted only of about 100 clients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The adherence pattern provides some evidence that reverse causality exists: clients who had not quit at 4 weeks did not continue to attend sessions after 4 weeks.
“This provides some evidence that reverse causality does exist: clients who had not quit at 4 weeks did not continue to attend sessions after 4 weeks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Clients who were successful in their quit attempt were more likely to complete the CSS.
“Clients who were successful in their quit attempt were more likely to complete the survey and this should be remembered when reviewing the findings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The lower quit rate in the Glasgow evaluation was primarily because of a much higher loss to follow-up at 4 weeks.
“This was primarily because of a much higher loss to follow-up at 4 weeks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Clients who took varenicline were more likely to adhere to taking their medication.
“Thus those who took varenicline were more likely to adhere to taking their medication.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
Weights were applied to correct for low recruitment, drawing on an 'all cases' database created from routine data in the study areas.
“To correct for this, weights were applied, drawing on an 'all cases' database created from routine data in the study areas.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Cutting down with NRT does not increase overall nicotine intake.
“and does not increase overall nicotine intake.67”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [67] Beard, 2011, Is use of nicotine replacement therapy while continuing to smoke associated with increased nicotine intake? Evidence from a population sample, Psychopharmacology source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Quitters had significantly higher well-being than non-quitters at each time point.
“However, CIs for quitters and non-quitters at each time point did not overlap.This is an indication that quitters had significantly higher well-being than non-quitters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
NRT licensing is being changed to allow its use for harm reduction purposes among ex-smokers.
“NRT licensing is also being changed to allow its use for harm reduction purposes among ex-smokers.71”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [71] Fucito, 2014, Addressing the evidence for FDA nicotine replacement therapy label changes: a policy statement of the Association for the Treatment of Tobacco Use and Dependence and the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, Nicotine Tob Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
A mediator of the association between dependence on tobacco and well-being appeared to be not being able to cope with stress.
“A mediator of the association between dependence on tobacco and well-being appeared to be not being able to cope with stress.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The WHO-5 Well-being Index is a valid measure of well-being.
- Interpretationown data
A consistent pattern emerged suggesting that smokers who accessed SSSs in the ELONS study areas and responded to the survey had a very positive experience, for both quitters and non-quitters.
“A consistent pattern emerged that suggests that smokers who accessed SSSs, in the ELONS study areas and responded to the survey, had a very positive experience, for both quitters and non-quitters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Trials have shown that extended use of NRT by ex-smokers may result in better long-term abstinence rates.
“Trials have also shown that extended use of NRT by ex-smokers may result in better long-term abstinence rates.68,69”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [68] Schnoll, 2010, Effectiveness of extended-duration transdermal nicotine therapy: a randomized trial, Ann Intern Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [69] Joseph, 2011, Chronic disease management for tobacco dependence: a randomized, controlled trial, Arch Intern Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In many other countries (unlike in the UK) NRT is rarely provided for free on prescription.
“and in many other countries (unlike in the UK) it is rarely provided for free on prescription.81”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [81] Shahab, 2009, The impact of changing nicotine replacement therapy licensing laws in the United Kingdom: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey, Addiction source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
Owing to the small numbers involved (only 50 clients used products long term), there was insufficient power to detect meaningful differences between those who had remained abstinent and those who had relapsed.
“Owing to the small numbers involved (only 50 clients used products long term), there was insufficient power to detect meaningful differences between those who had remained abstinent and those who had relapsed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
From the secondary analysis it would appear that the services that had the highest impact focused on quit rates rather than throughput.
“From the secondary analysis it would appear that the services that had the highest impact focused on quit rates rather than throughput.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
More people may now be using cleaner forms of nicotine longer term than in the 2002 national evaluation.
“This means that more people may now be using cleaner forms of nicotine longer term, with 6% of our sample reporting using NRT at 1 year and 2.9% using e-cigarettes at 1 year post quit date.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Applying the ELONS study results (8% quit at 1 year), 55,767 would have been CO validated as abstinent at 1 year.
“Applying the ELONS study results (8% quit at 1 year), 55,767 would have been CO validated as abstinent at 1 year.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In a previous national evaluation of SSSs in England (Nottingham and North Cumbria, 2002), self-reported longer-term NRT use at 1 year was 5%.
“In our previous 'national' evaluation of SSSs in England, conducted in Nottingham and North Cumbria in 2002, self-reported longer-term NRT use at 1 year was just 5%.106”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [106] Hajek, 2007, Dependence potential of nicotine replacement treatments: effects of product type, patient characteristics, and cost to user, Prev Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The results from the prospective study suggest that services will be particularly effective in terms of achieving long-term cessation if they provide groups or one-to-one support by specialist practitioners.
“The results from the prospective study suggest that services will be particularly effective in terms of achieving long-term cessation if they provide groups or one-to-one support by specialist practitioners.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The best estimates of the relapse rate to smoking after 1 year are 35%.
“The best estimates of the relapse rate to smoking after 1 year are 35%.88”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [88] Stapleton, 2012, A direct method and ICER tables for the estimation of the cost-effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions in general populations: application to a new cytisine trial and other examples, Nicotine Tob Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
This would leave 36,249 lifelong abstinent quitters.
“This would leave 36,249 lifelong abstinent quitters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Thus, smoking tobacco (rather than stopping) appears to be associated with heightened feelings of stress.
“Thus, smoking tobacco (rather than stopping) appears to be associated with heightened feelings of stress.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The reported rate of longer-term e-cigarette usage in the ELONS study is low compared with estimates of one in five smokers or recent ex-smokers using e-cigarettes in the general population.
“although it is worth noting that the reported rate of longer-term e-cigarette usage in the ELONS study is low compared with the estimates of one in five smokers or recent ex-smokers using e-cigarettes in the general population.107”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [107] Brown, 2014, Prevalence and characteristics of e-cigarette users in Great Britain: Findings from a general population survey of smokers, Addict Behav source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
This means the views of those who did not quit are under-represented.
“This means the views of those who did not quit are under-represented.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
Selection of PCTs for secondary analysis and prospective study being limited to services that used Quit Manager software could raise issues of validity, specifically representativeness.
“Owing to selection of the PCTs for the secondary analysis and the prospective study being limited to services that used Quit Manager software, this could raise issues of validityspecifically representativeness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The finding that long-term NRT use among ex-smokers did not result in a decrease in cotinine levels does not mean that long-term use maintains addiction to nicotine.
“The fact that long-term use among ex-smokers did not result in a decrease in cotinine levels, however, does not mean that long-term use maintains addiction to nicotine.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The study design cannot exclude reverse causation (individuals with high sensitivity to nicotine intake use NRT for longer), despite controlling for baseline characteristics.
“Although we controlled for baseline characteristics, the study design cannot exclude reverse causation, that is, the fact that particular individuals who happen to have a high sensitivity to nicotine intake, use NRT for longer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
The ELONS prospective study sample differed little in demographic characteristics from all clients that attended the nine services.
“Moreover, the ELONS prospective study sample differed little in terms of demographic characteristics to all the clients that attended the nine services.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The prospective study had limitations, the most substantial being recruitment.
“However, the prospective study also had limitations, the most substantial being recruitment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The within-group analysis suggests that virtually all baseline nicotine may be replaced by NRT among long-term ex-smokers.
“Although the cross-sectional analysis did not detect a significant increase in cotinine levels among ex-smokers using NRT compared with those not using NRT, the within-group analysis suggests that virtually all baseline nicotine may be replaced by NRT among long-term ex-smokers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
Comparison with 2010/11 data for all English PCTs found similar rates of self-report quit and CO validation.
“Comparison with 2010/11 data for all English PCTs found similar rates of self-report quit and CO validation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The secondary analysis sample was representative of the whole.
“Furthermore, the self-reported quit rate for all English SSSs from April 2010 to March 2011 was also 49%, and 70% were CO validated 43 compared with 74% in the secondary analysis sample suggesting that the sample were representative of the whole.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
If these results are applied to all of England, then in 2012-13 the services supported 36,249 clients to become non-smokers for the remainder of their lives.
“If these results are applied to all of England, then we estimate that in the year 2012-13 the services supported 36,249 clients to become non-smokers for the remainder of their lives, which is a significant number.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The study recruited only a small proportion of eligible service clients in each study area.
“The result was that we recruited only a small proportion of eligible service clients in each study area.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The association between greater alpha-amylase activity and lower nicotine dependence is likely because tobacco smoke acutely inhibits alpha-amylase activity.
“The somewhat paradoxical finding that greater activity in alpha-amylase at follow-up and an increase in alpha-amylase activity across time were both associated with lower nicotine dependence is likely because tobacco smoke has been shown to acutely inhibit alpha-amylase activity.117”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [117] Rohleder, 2009, Determinants of salivary alpha-amylase in humans and methodological considerations, Psychoneuroendocrinology source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
This analysis provides some reassurance about longer-term nicotine use when not delivered through tobacco.
“This analysis provides some reassurance about longer-term nicotine use when not delivered through tobacco.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premiseown data
In a sample of over 3000 clients who received health trainer services in the West Midlands, the WHO-5 Well-being Index score improved by 37.5% (from 44.1 to 60.7) after receiving the service.
“In a sample of over 3000 clients who received health trainer services in the West Midlands, 60 the WHO-5 Well-being Index score improved by 37.5% (from a score of 44.1 to a score of 60.7) after receiving the service.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [60] Lister, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 302
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 182
- The quote only partly states this claim. 28
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenMore than 60 of approximately 150 English primary care trusts use QuitManager and 49 of these gave permission to the National Centre for Smoking Cessation and Training for their data to be used for research.
“More than 60 out of the ≈ 150 English PCTs use QuitManager and 49 of these gave permission to the NCSCT for their data to be used for research purposes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingreasoningThe months included were July-November 2010 and January-May 2011 (n = 19,481).
“Thus, the months included were July-November 2010 and January-May 2011 (n = 19,481).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOne primary care trust included only clients who saw practitioners through the specialist service in QuitManager, so it was not possible to provide an estimate of reach for this primary care trust.
“Third, a PCT was known to include only clients who saw practitioners through the specialist service in QuitManager.Thus it was not possible to provide an estimate of reach for this PCT.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataInspection of the QuitManager database suggested that the narrow 25-42 day range may be underestimating the number of quitters, so all clients who self-reported as quit were included in the analysis.
“Inspection of the QuitManager database suggested that this narrow range may be underestimating the number of quitters, so all clients who self-reported as quit were included in the analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenSelf-report quitters who set quit dates in January were most likely to be carbon monoxide validated and November quitters were least likely.
“Self-report quitters who set quit dates in January were most likely to be CO validated and November quitters were least likely.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe self-report quit rate of unique clients was 49.8%.
“the self-report quit rate was 49.8%”
- Also stated in: § Summary of key points · plain
“The self-reported and CO-validated quit rates were 49% and 34% respectively at 4 weeks post quit date.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Summary of key points · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThese primary care trusts' Stop Smoking Services used the QuitManager database to record and report on their routine data.
“These PCTs' SSSs used the QuitManager database to record and report on their routine data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe self-report quit rate for unique clients aged ≥ 16 years was 50.0%.
“and the self-report quit rate was 50.0%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe highest odds ratios were for clients who took varenicline alone; these people were more than twice as likely to self-report and carbon monoxide validate as quit.
“The highest ORs were for clients who took varenicline alone.These people were more than twice as likely to self-report and CO validate as quit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTwo London PCTs displayed high quit rates but low throughput whereas three others displayed particularly high throughput but low CO-validated quit rates.
“Two London PCTs displayed high quit rates but low throughput whereas three others displayed particularly high throughput but low CO-validated quit rates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMen and pregnant women were more likely to quit than non-pregnant women.
“Men and pregnant women were more likely to quit than non-pregnant women.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenClients who had used the service once before were less likely to quit than those who had never used the service before, and those who had used the service four or more times were more likely to quit.
“Clients who had used the service once before were less likely to quit than those who had never used the service before and those who had used the service four or more times were more likely to quit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhen the impact was calculated using all self-report quitters, two services were estimated to have a negative impact, as did six services when only carbon monoxide validated quitters were included.
“When the impact was calculated using all self-report quitters, two services were estimated to have a negative impact as did six services when only CO-validated quitters were included.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOverall, the self-report quit rate comfortably passed the 35% level and the carbon monoxide validated quit rate almost reached this level.
“Overall, the self-report quit rate comfortably passed this level and the CO-validated quit rate almost reached this level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataQuit rates and impact measures were normally distributed.
“and quit rates and impact measures were normally distributed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe carbon monoxide validation rate of the database was 73.9% and was 74.3% among clients with gender, age and practitioner identified.
“The CO-validation rate (self-reports that were CO validated) of the database was 73.9% and was 74.3% among clients with gender, age and practitioner identified (see Table 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataClosed-group clients were significantly more likely to self-report as quit than those who undertook one-to-one counselling, but the difference did not quite reach significance for carbon monoxide validation.
“Closed-group clients were significantly more likely to self-report as quit than those who undertook one-to-one counselling but the difference did not quite reach significance for CO validation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhen extreme primary care trusts were excluded, the variance between primary care trusts halved and there was no longer significant variation between practitioners.
“When extreme PCTs were excluded the variance between PCTs halved and there was no longer significant variation between practitioners.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSome subgroups met the 35% target for carbon monoxide validated quitting: clients who were working or retired or caring for the home, prisoners, clients who paid for prescriptions, clients in primary care trusts that were not particularly disadvantaged or affluent, clients who set quit dates in January or February, clients who took combination NRT or just varenicline, clients who attended groups,,
“Some subgroups met this target for CO-validated quitting, they were: clients who were working or who were retired or caring for the home, prisoners, clients who paid for prescriptions, clients in PCTs who were not particularly disadvantaged or affluent, clients who set quit dates in January or February, clients who took combination NRT or just varenicline, clients who attended groups and clients”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe distribution of client records and unique clients among the PCTs was skewed.
“The distribution of client records and unique clients among the PCTs were skewed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe quit rates of the sample used in the analysis were 48.8% self-report and 34.1% carbon monoxide validated.
“The quit rates of the sample used in the analysis were 48.8% (self-report) and 34.1% (CO validated).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataExcluding clients from the lowest ranked primary care trust made little difference to the results.
“Further exploration (not shown) suggested that excluding clients from the lowest ranked PCT made little difference to the results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataFull models did not converge in either Stata xt or MLwiN Markov chain Monte Carlo.
“Full models did not converge in either Stata xt or MLwiN Markov chain Monte Carlo.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataVarenicline and combination NRT were both used frequently and increased the chances of quitting compared with a single NRT product.
“Varenicline and combination NRT were both used frequently and increased the chances of quitting compared with a single NRT product.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenSome sites found this easier to manage than others, depending on how they delivered their service.
“Some sites found this easier to manage than others, depending on how they delivered their service.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenSix sites recruited level 2 service providers. The number of individual providers recruited varied between 4 and 23.
“Six sites recruited level 2 service providers.The number of individual providers recruited varied between 4 and 23.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenIn some of the services, clients were recruited to the study when they registered with the SSS, which was sometimes before they set a quit date. Some of these clients never did set a quit date.
“In some of the services, clients were recruited to the study when they registered with the SSS, which was sometimes before they set a quit date.Some of these clients never did set a quit date.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe recruitment start date was staggered by site.
“In addition, the recruitment start date was staggered by site.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe main reasons for declining were that they perceived available service support costs to be inadequate, it was an onerous consent process and there were factors related to service reorganisation.
“The main reasons for declining were that they perceived available service support costs to be inadequate, it was an onerous consent process and there were factors related to service reorganisation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSome practitioners, particularly pharmacy employees, reported that clients simply did not want to take part.
“Some practitioners, particularly pharmacy employees, reported that clients simply did not want to take part.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHighest quit rates were found among older people, men and clients with higher SES.
“Highest quit rates were found among older people, men and clients with higher SES.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenEight services were initially recruited to the study.
“Eight services were initially recruited to the study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningPractitioner feedback suggests that the main reasons were that clients did not have time to go through the recruitment process (particularly for working people who scheduled appointments) or did not want to be contacted for follow-up (often older people).
“Practitioner feedback suggests that the main reasons were that clients did not have time to go through the recruitment process (particularly for working people who scheduled appointments) or did not want to be contacted for follow-up (often older people).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningThe process of site recruitment took longer than expected (it was common for this process to take months rather than weeks).
“However, the process of site recruitment took longer than expected (it was common for this process to take months rather than weeks)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe ELONS study mostly relied on practitioners to recruit clients and some were more confident and committed to this than others.
“The ELONS study mostly relied on practitioners to recruit clients and some were more confident and committed to this than others.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOverall, impact was significantly positively associated with CO-validated quitting, self-report quitting and impact, taking into account either only CO-validated quits or taking into account all self-report quits.
“Overall, impact was significantly positively associated with CO-validated quitting, self-report quitting and impact, taking into account either only CO-validated quits or taking into account all self-report quits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe data collected in QuitManager did not consistently differentiate between behavioural support types.
“The initial hurdle was that the data collected in QuitManager did not consistently differentiate between behavioural support types.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe main ambiguity was between one-to-one specialist practitioner support and level 2 support and, to a lesser extent, between one to one and drop-in.
“The main ambiguity was between one-to-one specialist practitioner support and level 2 support and, to a lesser extent, between one to one and drop-in.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAlmost 80% of the service clients received one-to-one counselling.
“In total, almost 80% of the service clients received one-to-one counselling”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenJanuary was the month with the highest number of quit dates set and the most successful quitters.
“January was the month with the highest number of quit dates set and the most successful quitters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningClient recruitment started later than planned, after the busy New Year period had ended.
“As a result of this, client recruitment started later than planned, after the busy New Year period had ended.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThe estimated number of clients treated by SSSs from mid-2010 to mid-2011 was 5-10% of their smoking population.
“The estimated number of clients treated by SSSs from mid-2010 to mid-2011 was 5-10% of their smoking population.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe number of quit dates set in SSSs in England for 2011/12 was 816,444 and in 2012/13 this has decreased by 11% to 724,247.
“The number of quit dates set in SSSs in England for 2011/12 was 816,444 and in 2012/13 this has decreased by 11% to 724,247.31”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Health and Social Care Information Centre, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningDespite efforts to boost recruitment, the challenges described above meant that our initial target baseline sample of 5000 (as set out in our original research proposal) was too ambitious.
“Despite efforts to boost recruitment, the challenges described above meant that our initial target baseline sample of 5000 (as set out in our original research proposal) was too ambitious.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningRecruitment was a particular challenge for the prospective study.
“Recruitment was a particular challenge for the prospective study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThis procedure and the length of the consent form was undoubtedly a barrier to participation and SSSs reported that it resulted in serious time implications.
“This procedure and the length of the consent form was undoubtedly a barrier to participation and SSSs reported that it resulted in serious time implications”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataOnly three PCTs that the research team approached declined to participate in the study.
“Despite this, only three PCTs that the research team approached declined to participate in the study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe PCTs with the highest impact were generally those with high quit-rates and vice versa.
“The PCTs with the highest impact were generally those with high quit-rates and vice versa.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThere were 202,084 client records in the QuitManager database used here.
“compared with the 202,084 client records in the QuitManager database used here.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningOutcomes for full-time students were among the poorest and had the largest gap between self-report and CO-validated quits (41% compared with 23%).
“Outcomes for full-time students were among the poorest and also had the largest gap between self-report and CO-validated quits (41% compared with 23%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataData were available from 3075 clients; six pregnant participants were excluded, leaving 3069 cases.
“Data were available from 3075 clients; there were, however, six participants that were excluded from this preliminary analysis because they were pregnant, leaving 3069 cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataClients in the other/unknown ethnicity category were significantly more likely to quit than Asians (59% compared with 27%; p < 0.001), although the numbers are very small.
“Clients in this final category were significantly more likely to quit than Asians (59% compared with 27%; p < 0.001) although the numbers are very small.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe 4-week CO-validated quit rate was 44%.
“the 4-week CO-validated quit rate was 44%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOver half (51%) of clients were extremely determined to quit and they had the highest quit rates, with 62% self-reported abstinence at 4 weeks.
“Over half (51%) of clients were extremely determined to quit and they had the highest quit rates, with 62% self-reported abstinence at 4 weeks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe highest quit rates were associated with quitting between 6 and 60 minutes after waking (47-49% in preliminary analysis); quit rates of clients who smoked over 60 minutes after waking had quit rates similar to clients who smoked within 5 minutes of waking (42% and 41% respectively).
“However, the highest quit rates were associated with quitting between 6 and 60 minutes after waking (47-49% in preliminary analysis); quit rates of clients who smoked over 60 minutes after waking had quit rates similar to clients who smoked within 5 minutes of waking (42% and 41% respectively).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataInitial analysis of dependence showed that high daily consumption of cigarettes and smoking within 5 minutes of waking were associated with low quit rates.
“Initial analysis of dependence showed that high daily consumption of cigarettes and smoking within 5 minutes of waking were associated with low quit rates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataHeart, blood and circulation conditions were 25 times more prevalent in the oldest age group than in the youngest age group (49% compared with 2%; p < 0.001).
“Heart, blood and circulation conditions were 25 times more prevalent in the oldest age group than in the youngest age group (49% compared with 2%; p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Heaviness of Smoking Index was of only borderline significance in preliminary analysis and had a non-linear relationship with quitting.
“Thus the Heaviness of Smoking Index was of only borderline significance in preliminary analysis and had a non-linear relationship with quitting.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data67% of those who smoked for ≥ 40 years had quit, compared with 49% of those who smoked for ≤ 10 years (p < 0.001).
“67% of those smoked for ≥ 40 years had quit, in comparison with just 49% of those who smoked for ≤ 10 years (p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere was no relationship for respiratory conditions or other medical conditions.
“There was no relationship for respiratory conditions or other medical conditions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOlder clients were more likely to attend GP practices than other clients (12% of 65- to 85-year-olds received GP practice services compared with 6% of 16- to 17-year-olds), whereas younger clients were more likely to attend pharmacy services (5% of 16- to 17-year-olds received pharmacy services compared with 2% of 65- to 85-year-olds; p = 0.026).
“Older clients were more likely to attend GP practices than other clients (12% of 65-to 85-year-olds received GP practice services compared with 6% of 16-to 17-year-olds), whereas younger clients were more likely to attend pharmacy services (5% of 16-to 17-year-olds received pharmacy services compared with 2% of 65-to 85-year-olds; p = 0.026).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere were 234 practitioners in the prospective study and the median number of clients recruited was four.
“There were 234 practitioners in the prospective study and the median number of clients recruited was four.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHaving a medical condition was not related to abstinence at 4 weeks, and neither was having a more severe medical condition.
“Having a medical condition was not related to abstinence at 4 weeks and neither was having a more severe medical condition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataInitial multilevel modelling revealed no evidence of variance between practitioners; the practitioner made no difference to the chances of long-term quitting.
“Initial multilevel modelling revealed that there was consistently no evidence of variance between practitioners (i.e. the practitioner made no difference to the chances of long-term quitting)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThere were no SES or gender differences in determination to quit.
“There were no SES or gender differences in determination to quit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataClients in midlife were most dependent on tobacco (4-9% had the highest dependency score compared with 3% in the oldest and youngest age groups; p < 0.001) but were also the most determined to quit (50-54% compared with 44-47%; p = not available).
“clients in midlife were most dependent on tobacco (4-9% had the highest dependency score compared with 3% in the oldest and youngest age groups; p < 0.001) but were also the most determined to quit (50-54% compared with 44-47%; p = not available).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data30% of clients who reported that all their friends and family smoked were CO validated as quit at 4 weeks, compared with 53% who reported that none of their friends or family members smoked (p < 0.001).
“30% of clients who reported that all their friends and family were CO validated as quit at 4 weeks compared with 53% who reported that none of their friends or family members smoked (p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf those who smoked ≤ 10 cigarettes per day, 65% reported that they were abstinent at 4 weeks, compared with 45% of those who smoked ≥ 31 cigarettes per day.
“Of those who smoked ≤ 10 cigarettes per day, 65% reported that they were abstinent at 4 weeks in comparison with just 45% of those who smoked ≥ 31 cigarettes per day.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataClients who did not answer questions about their previous quit attempt were less likely to quit (25%), but there was little difference between clients who had and had not made a quit attempt (44-45%).
“Clients who did not answer questions about their previous quit attempt were less likely to quit (25%) but there was little difference between clients who had and had not made a quit attempt (44-45%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSick/unemployed clients (p < 0.001), males (p = 0.002) and middle-age groups (p < 0.001) reported higher nicotine dependency than other groups.
“The sick/unemployed (p < 0.001), males (p = 0.002) and middle-age groups (p < 0.001) reported higher nicotine dependency than other groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data'Stoptober' was mentioned as a route into the service for 81 clients.
“'Stoptober' (a government-supported campaign to encourage smokers to quit for at least the month of October) was mentioned as a route into the service for 81 clients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSingle NRT and combination NRT tended to be recorded on one or two occasions; varenicline and other/mixed medication were more likely to be recorded on three or more occasions.
“Single NRT and combination NRT tended to be recorded on one or two occasions.Varenicline and other/mixed medication were more likely to be recorded on three or more occasions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCIs overlapped for all forms of behavioural support, but there were only about 100 clients who received closed group support or pharmacy service support, leading to very wide CIs.
“CIs overlapped for all forms of support but there were only about 100 clients who received closed group support or pharmacy service support leading to very wide CIs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe raw quit rate at 1 year was 9.3%, but after weighting this reduced marginally to 7.7% (95% CI 6.6% to 9.0%).
“The raw quit rate in the longer term, at 1 year, was 9.3% but after weighting this reduced marginally to 7.7% (95% CI 6.6% to 9.0%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe final ELONS study sample consisted of 3057 SSS clients, once pregnant clients and clients whose advisor was unclear had been excluded.
“The final ELONS study sample consisted of 3057 SSS clients, once pregnant clients and clients whose advisor was unclear had been excluded.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataClients in the ELONS study set quit dates between March 2012 and March 2013, clustered with most being set between July and November 2012.
“Clients in the ELONS study set quit dates between March 2012 and March 2013, as shown in Table 18.These were clustered, however, with most being set between July and November 2012.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataVarenicline use varied by study site (p < 0.001) and by NSSEC (33% sick/unemployed clients compared with 53% clients with routine and manual occupations and 51% clients with professional, managerial and intermediate occupations; p < 0.001).
“Varenicline use also varied by study site (p < 0.001) and by NSSEC (33% sick/unemployed clients compared with 53% clients with routine and manual occupations and 51% clients with professional, managerial and intermediate occupations; p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenAt 52 weeks, there were no significant seasonality effects.
“At 52 weeks, there were no significant seasonality effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOne per cent of clients were seen by other types of practitioners, mostly GP practice staff in administration/reception and/or those working in a general well-being improvement field.
“One per cent of clients were seen by other types of practitioners.Most of these were GP practice staff who worked in roles such as administration and receptionists and/or those who worked in a general well-being improvement field”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataClients who saw pharmacy assistants were least likely to be CO validated as quit, and clients who saw pharmacy managers or pharmacists were most likely to have a CO-validated quit compared with all other practitioner types (p = 0.0003).
“Clients who saw pharmacy assistants were least likely to be CO validated as quit, and clients who saw pharmacy managers or pharmacists were most likely to have a CO-validated quit compared with all other practitioner types (p = 0.0003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningThere were 150 clients who did not set a quit date from only three of the nine sites.
“There were 150 clients who did not set a quit date from only three of the nine sites.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningRecruitment rates were higher for the specialist service (14%) than the level 2 providers (2%), at least partly because not all level 2 providers took part and those that did recruited for different periods.
“Recruitment rates were higher for the specialist service (14%) than the level 2 providers (2%) at least partly because not all level 2 providers took part and those that did recruited for different periods.”
- Also stated in: § PROSPECTIVE STUDY FINDINGS · hedged
“Recruitment rates were higher for the specialist service (14%) than the level 2 providers (2%) at least partly because not all level 2 providers took part and those that did recruited for different periods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § PROSPECTIVE STUDY FINDINGS · hedged
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataTwo-thirds of clients gave a saliva sample.
“Two-thirds of clients gave a saliva sample, as Table 18 illustrates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAbout 8% of clients were seen by practice nurses and health-care assistants based in GP practices.
“About 8% of clients were seen by practice nurses and health-care assistants based in GP practices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPharmacy practitioners had the most extreme quit rates (i.e. the highest and lowest), but altogether pharmacy practitioners recruited only 97 clients so subgroups are very small.
“Pharmacy practitioners had the most extreme quit rates (i.e. the highest and lowest), but altogether pharmacy practitioners recruited only 97 clients so subgroups are very small.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataYounger clients were more likely to give a saliva sample (68% compared with 55% and 57% for the two oldest age groups).
“Younger clients were more likely to give a saliva sample (68% compared with 55% and 57% for the two oldest age groups).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataQuit rates were approximately 32% or below if medications were recorded only on one or two occasions but were over 60% if they were noted on three or more occasions (p < 0.001).
“Quit rates were approximately 32% or below if medications were recorded only on one or two occasions but were over 60% if they were noted on three or more occasions (p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataOnly 1% took bupropion.
“Only 1% took bupropion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThere were 22 clients, from five of the nine sites, who were recruited twice to the ELONS study, meaning they had more than one quit attempt with the service during the study period.
“There were 22 clients, from five of the nine sites, who were recruited twice to the ELONS study.This means they had more than one quit attempt with the service during the study periodthey were 'repeat' attenders”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants lost to follow-up were 22.6% at 4 weeks and 45.2% at 52 weeks.
“Participants who were lost to follow-up (22.6% at 4 weeks and 45.2% at 52 weeks) were assumed to be smoking”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Participants who were lost to follow-up were assumed to be smoking, consistent with an intention-to-treat analysis.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataClients who received one-to-one or drop-in specialist support had intermediate quit rates, 10.2% (95% CI 7.6% to 13.7%) and 7.6% (95% CI 5.1% to 11.0%), respectively.
“Clients who received one-to-one or drop-in specialist support quit rates were intermediate, 10.2% (95% CI 7.6% to 13.7%) and 7.6% (95% CI 5.1% to 11.0%), respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere were no significant gender or ethnic differences at 52 weeks.
“There were no significant gender or ethnic differences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAbout 3% of clients were seen by pharmacy practitioners.
“About 3% of clients were seen by pharmacy practitioners.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the short term, at 4 weeks, quit rates were higher among older people and clients with higher levels of well-being.
“In the short term, at 4 weeks, quit rates were higher among older people and clients with higher levels of well-being.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOver half of the ELONS study participants were seen in GP practices (52%) and one-fifth (21%) in a community-oriented building such as a community centre.
“Over a half of the ELONS study participants were seen in GP practices (52%) and one-fifth (21%) in a community-oriented building such as a community centre.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere were no significant gender, socioeconomic or ethnic differences in short-term quit rates.
“There were no significant gender, socioeconomic or ethnic differences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataYounger people took medication on fewer occasions; only 30% took medication on three or more occasions compared with 44% or more in the other age groups (p < 0.001).
“younger people took medication on fewer occasions.Only 30% took medication on three or more occasions compared with 44% or more in the other age groups (p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe CO-validated raw quit rate at 4 weeks was 44.1%, but after weighting this reduced marginally to 41.2% (95% CI 34.9% to 47.9%).
“The CO-validated raw quit rate at 4 weeks was 44.1% but after weighting this reduced marginally to 41.2% (95% CI 34.9% to 47.9%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataClients who attended sessions in a children's centre were most likely quit (51%) and those who attended a dedicated SSS shop or stall were least likely to quit (27%; p = 0.003).
“Clients who attended sessions in a children's centre were most likely quit (51%) and those who attended a dedicated SSS shop or stall were least likely to quit (27%; p =0 .003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSite 6 had the highest helpfulness of CO test (81%) and site 1 the lowest (57%).
“There was a significant difference between location, with respondents from site 6 reporting highest levels of helpfulness (81%) and site 1 respondents were least likely to say that the CO-validation test was very helpful (57%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere were 1006 questionnaires received and the final CSS data set had 996 cases.
“There were 1006 questionnaires received and the final data set had 996 cases (one was removed because of missing data and nine discarded because they had been completed twice).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data94% said it was easy to contact the SSS and 88% were given an appointment date or told how long they would need to wait.
“The majority of respondents (94%) said it was easy to contact the SSS and the majority (88%) were given an appointment date or told how long they would need to wait to receive one.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThere were no significant differences in quitting detected at 4 or 52 weeks for medication recorded in week 1.
“There were no significant differences in quitting detected at 4 or 52 weeks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data94% would return to a SSS if they started smoking again and 86% felt they would be welcomed back.
“A further 94% would return to a SSS should they start smoking again and 86% felt that they would be welcomed back:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data41.5% were given the choice of whether they would like an individual or group appointment.
“Two-fifths (41.5%) were given the choice of whether they would like an individual or group appointment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataEthnicity and determination to quit were eliminated from the 1-year abstinence model by the backwards-stepwise procedure.
“Ethnicity and determination to quit were eliminated from the model by the backwards-stepwise procedure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOpen-ended comments highlighted a lack of information on the side effects of medication and difficulty obtaining medication.
“However, analysis of open-ended comments highlighted two areas for consideration: a lack of information on the side effects of medication and difficulty obtaining medication.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPredictors of abstinence at 52 weeks included attending group behavioural support or receiving one-to-one support from a specialist practitioner, taking varenicline, attending SSS in the New Year, being older, being more affluent, having a lower dependence on tobacco, having a higher well-being score, having support from a spouse or partner, and having a social network not populated with smokers.
“Predictors of abstinence at 52 weeks were largely similar and included: ¢ attending group behavioural support or receiving one-to-one support from a specialist practitioner ¢ taking varenicline ¢ attending SSS in the New Year ¢ being older ¢ being more affluent ¢ having a lower dependence on tobacco ¢ having a higher well-being score ¢ having support from a spouse or partner ¢ having a social”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data94% found information about different types of stop smoking medication helpful and 92% reported it was easy to obtain their medication of choice, with 49.8% via GP prescription.
“Respondents indicated that the information given about different types of stop smoking medication was helpful (94%) and 92% reported that it was easy to obtain their medication of choice [with a half (49.8%) via GP prescription]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf CSS respondents, 71% were CO-validated abstinent at 4 weeks, compared with 44% in the overall ELONS sample.
“Of the respondents who completed a CSS, 71% were CO validated as abstinent from smoking 4 weeks after their quit date.In the overall ELONS study sample, the proportion of clients who had a CO-validated quit was a lot lower (44%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe difference in lost to follow-up occurred at all stages (4-week follow-up, 52-week telephone and 52-week validation) but was highest for the 52-week telephone interview.
“The difference in lost to follow-up occurred at all stages (4-week follow-up, 52-week telephone and 52-week validation) but was highest for the 52-week telephone interview.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data83% of the sample said child care costs were irrelevant.
“Child care costs were irrelevant for 83% of the sample.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe previous English evaluation in Nottingham and North Cumbria had a higher CO-validated quit rate at 52 weeks (14.6%) than the ELONS study and a lower lost to follow-up rate (37.5%).
“As Table 27 shows, the previous English evaluation in Nottingham and North Cumbria had a higher CO-validated quit rate at 52 weeks (14.6%) than the ELONS study and a lower lost to follow-up rate (37.5%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe raw 1-year quit rate was 9.3%; after weighting this reduced to 7.7%.
“For smoking cessation in the longer term, the raw quit rate at 1 year was 9.3% but after weighting this reduced to 7.7%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAmong clients who quit at 4 weeks, adherence has no discernible effect on quitting at 52 weeks as confidence intervals overlap.
“These results suggest that adherence has no discernible effect on quitting as CIs overlap.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data60% waited 5 or fewer days for their first appointment, 22% were seen within 24 hours, and 92.5% felt the time they waited was acceptable.
“Three-fifths (60%) waited 5 or fewer days for their first appointment (22% were seen straight or away or within 24 hours) and the majority (92.5%) felt the time they waited was acceptable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataOne-third (33%) of ELONS study participants completed the CSS.
“This means that one-third (33%) of the ELONS study participants completed this survey.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown data63% of GP practice respondents were from site 1 and 96% of open-group respondents were from site 6.
“Nearly two-thirds (63%) of GP practice respondents were from site 1 and 96% of open-group respondents were from site 6.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenQuit rates for 4 and 52 weeks from the ELONS prospective study were lower than those identified in the previous national evaluation in England, but higher than a recent study in Glasgow that examined closed-group and pharmacy-based services.
“Quit rates for 4 and 52 weeks from the ELONS prospective study were lower than those identified in the previous national evaluation in England, but higher than a recent study in Glasgow that examined closed-group and pharmacy-based services.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe raw 4-week quit rate was 44.1%; with weighting this reduced marginally to 41.2%.
“In terms of smoking cessation in the short term, the raw quit rate at 4 weeks was 44.1%.With weighting this reduced marginally to 41.2%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPredictors of smoking abstinence at 4 weeks included attending an open group, attending SSS in the New Year, being older, being more affluent, having a lower dependence on tobacco, being determined to quit, having a higher well-being score, having support from a spouse or partner, and having a social network not populated with smokers.
“Predictors of smoking abstinence at 4 weeks were: ¢ attending an open group ¢ attending SSS in the New Year ¢ being older ¢ being more affluent ¢ having a lower dependence on tobacco ¢ being determined to quit ¢ having a higher well-being score ¢ having support from a spouse or partner ¢ having a social network not populated with smokers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThere were no significant differences at 52 weeks in quit rates by combination NRT use.
“There were no significant differences at 52 weeks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data90% rated the information and advice they received as very helpful or helpful and 82% found the written advice helpful or very helpful.
“Nine out of 10 (90%) rated the information and advice they received as very helpful or helpful and a further 82% found the written advice helpful/very helpful.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTwo-fifths of clients took varenicline and one-fifth took either only single or combination NRT at any point.
“If we consider what type of medication clients took at any point (Table 25), two-fifths of clients took varenicline and one-fifth took either only single or combination NRT.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data95% reported appointment times were convenient and 97% reported the venue was convenient.
“Appointment times and venues were rated very highly with 95% of respondents reporting that appointment times were convenient, and a further 97% stating that the venue was also convenient”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt 52 weeks, differences in cessation by adherence were smaller but still significant for both number of sessions and medication taken.
“At 52 weeks differences were smaller but still significant for both number of sessions and medication taken.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAdditional comments highlighted the importance of practitioner/client rapport, and multilevel modelling suggests this is an important factor in a successful quit attempt, at least in the short term.
“Additional comments highlighted the importance of practitioner/client rapport, and multilevel modelling of the ELONS study secondary analysis and prospective study data sets suggests that this is an important factor in a successful quit attempt, at least in the short term.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe vast majority who replied to the questionnaire indicated that they would recommend the service to others and return should the need arise.
“The vast majority who replied to the questionnaire indicated that they would recommend the service to others and return should the need arise.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe most consistent factors associated with well-being at baseline, 4 weeks and 52 weeks were not having a diagnosed mental health condition, low dependence on tobacco, and young or older age.
“The most consistent factors associated with well-being at baseline, 4 weeks and 52 weeks were: not having a diagnosed mental health condition; low dependence on tobacco; and young or older age.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The WHO-5 Well-being Index is a valid measure of well-being.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIf the ontological security items were not entered into the model, well-being was associated with cessation at 52 weeks and with baseline age, low dependence, and not having either a lung/respiratory or a mental health condition.
“However, if the ontological security items were not entered into the model, well-being was associated with cessation at 52 weeks and also the following variables collected at baseline: age, low dependence and not having either a lung/respiratory or a mental health condition (see Table 47).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataConfidence intervals did not overlap for 4-week quitters and non-quitters, and for 52-week quitters vs non-quitters, indicating significant differences between these client groups.
“CIs did not overlap for 4-week quitters and non-quitters, and CIs of clients who did manage to quit for 52 weeks did not overlap with those who did not manage to quit for 52 weeks, 4 weeks and the sample overall.This indicates that there were significant differences between these client groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataClients who had higher levels of well-being were consistently more likely to agree that they enjoyed a challenge, were doing well in life and felt more in control than other clients.
“Clients who had higher levels of well-being were consistently more likely to agree that they enjoyed a challenge, were doing well in life and felt more in control than other clients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The WHO-5 Well-being Index is a valid measure of well-being.
- Rests on an assumption: The ontological security items measure ontological security.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data87% of open-group clients vs 59% of GP practice clients found the CO test very helpful.
“This may reflect the behavioural support type: 87% of open-group clients said that a CO test during each session was very helpful, compared with 59% of GP practice clients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOpen-group clients were happier about staff supportiveness, returning to the service and CO testing; GP practice clients were least comfortable with CO testing; open-group clients were mostly recruited from a single site.
“Open-group clients were happier about staff supportiveness, returning to the service and CO testing.GP practice clients were least comfortable with CO testing.It must be noted that open-group clients were mostly recruited from a single site.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAbsence of a mental health condition had the strongest association with baseline well-being; clients without a mental health condition had well-being scores nearly 10 points higher than those with a condition.
“At baseline, multivariable modelling suggested that the factor with the strongest association with well-being was absence of a mental health condition.Thus, clients without a mental health condition had well-being scores nearly 10 points higher than those with a condition”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDespite quantitative findings suggesting that medication was easy to acquire, additional comments pointed to a more complex picture where the process of obtaining medication was overcomplicated and time-consuming for some respondents.
“Despite quantitative findings suggesting that medication was easy to acquire, additional comments pointed to a more complex picture where the process of obtaining medication was overcomplicated and time-consuming for some respondents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWell-being scores at 4 weeks were associated with successful cessation, age, Asian ethnicity, absence of heart, blood and circulatory diseases, and five ontological security items.
“Well-being scores at 4 weeks were associated with: successful cessation; age; Asian ethnicity (compared with non-British whites); absence of heart, blood and circulatory diseases; and five ontological security items (I enjoy a challenge; I feel I'm doing well in life; I feel in control; I can deal with stress; and most people would like a life like mine)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAsian clients had significantly higher well-being than non-British white clients, although numbers of these clients were very small.
“Asian clients had significantly higher well-being than non-British white clients, although numbers of these clients were very small.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe weighted well-being mean of the sample was 53.15 (95% CI 51.96 to 54.34).
“The weighted well-being mean of the sample was 53.15 (95% CI 51.96 to 54.34) (Table 37).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSupport from spouse or partner, determination to quit, lower dependence on tobacco, taking varenicline and absence of a physical medical condition were all significantly associated with well-being at baseline.
“Support from spouse or partner, determination to quit, lower dependence on tobacco, taking varenicline and the absence of a physical medical condition (such as not having heart, blood or circulatory problems) were all significantly associated with well-being at baseline.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSuggested improvements centred on evening appointment times, having a choice of group or one-to-one support and a longer period of support.
“Suggested improvements centred on evening appointment times, having a choice of group or one-to-one support and a longer period of support.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere was a linear rise in the levels of well-being among quitters, but the CIs of quitters' well-being at baseline, 4 weeks and 52 weeks overlapped.
“There was a linear rise in the levels of well-being among quitters, however, the CIs of quitters' well-being at baseline, 4 weeks and 52 weeks overlapped.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The WHO-5 Well-being Index is a valid measure of well-being.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFeeling in control partly attenuated the relationship between well-being and quitting but the association still remained significant.
“Feeling in control partly attenuated the relationship between well-being and quitting but the association still remained significant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataQuitters were more likely to be satisfied with staff supportiveness and happier to return to the services if needed, with the information provided and CO validation.
“Quitters were more likely to be satisfied with staff supportiveness and happier to return to the services if needed, with the information provided and CO validation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOnly lower dependence at baseline had an association with greater follow-up alpha-amylase activity (p = 0.004) but none of the other covariates or factors were associated.
“Only lower dependence at baseline had an association with greater follow-up alpha-amylase activity (p = 0.004) but none of the other covariates or factors were associated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn addition to older age (p = 0.011), dependence as measured by the Heaviness of Smoking Index was the only other significant predictor (p < 0.001).
“In addition to older age (p = 0.011), dependence as measured by the Heaviness of Smoking Index was the only other significant predictor (p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere was a clear difference between groups in follow-up cotinine levels (p < 0.001), confirmed in adjusted analysis (p < 0.001).
“There was a clear difference between groups in follow-up cotinine levels (p < 0.001), confirmed in adjusted analysis (p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOverall, e-cigarettes were the most popular product followed by the nicotine lozenge, patch and gum. Microtab and nasal spray were the least popular products. Around 20% of clients were using multiple products.
“Overall, e-cigarettes were the most popular product followed by the nicotine lozenge, patch and gum.Microtab (Nicorette ® , McNeil) and nasal spray were the least popular products.Around 20% of clients were using multiple products.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCompared with current smokers, there was a significant reduction in cotinine values only among quitters who did not use NRT; smoking status did not have an impact on cotinine values among those who used NRT but did among those who did not.
“Compared with current smokers, there was a significant reduction in cotinine values only among quitters who did not use NRT or put differently, smoking status did not have an impact on cotinine values among those who used NRT but did among those who did not.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNon-NRT users who were abstinent had significantly lower cotinine values than smokers with (p = 0.017) or without concurrent NRT use (p < 0.001) but not compared with quitters who used NRT (p = 0.232).
“Non-NRT users who were abstinent had significantly lower cotinine values than smokers with (p = 0.017) or without concurrent NRT use (p < 0.001) but not compared with quitters who used NRT (p = 0.232).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOur secondary analysis of routine data from 49 of 150 services in England found 4-week quit rates of 48% when self-reported data were included, falling to 34% when biochemical validation had occurred.
“Our secondary analysis of routine data from 49 of 150 services in England found 4-week quit rates of 48% when self-reported data were included, falling to 34% when biochemical validation had occurred.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth lower baseline nicotine dependence and non-white ethnicity were associated with an increase in alpha-amylase activity across time.
“Both lower baseline nicotine dependence and non-white ethnicity were associated with an increase in alpha-amylase activity across time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThis was confirmed in adjusted analysis (p = 0.185), which showed that older age (p = 0.001), being non-white (p = 0.021) and having any medical condition (p = 0.002) were associated with higher alpha-amylase activity at baseline.
“This was confirmed in adjusted analysis (p = 0.185), which showed that older age (p = 0.001), being non-white (p = 0.021) and having any medical condition (p = 0.002) were associated with higher alpha-amylase activity at baseline.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataLong-term ex-smokers were much more likely still to be using non-combustible nicotine products at 12-month follow-up than relapsers (OR 4.25, 95% CI 2.15 to 8.40); concurrent use among relapsers stood at 3.7% (95% CI 2.0% to 6.5%, n = 12) compared with 14.0% (95% CI 10.3% to 18.7%, n = 38) among continuous abstainers.
“However, long-term ex-smokers were much more likely still be using non-combustible nicotine products at 12-month follow-up than relapsers (OR 4.25, 95% CI 2.15 to 8.40); concurrent use among relapsers stood at 3.7% (95% CI 2.0% to 6.5%, n = 12) compared with 14.0% (95% CI 10.3% to 18.7%, n = 38) among continuous abstainers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThere were some differences in baseline cotinine levels between groups (p = 0.025).
“As can be seen in Table 44, there were some differences in baseline cotinine levels between groups (p = 0.025).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere was a marginal effect of dependence (p = 0.062) and ethnicity (p = 0.052) on changes in alpha-amylase activity.
“However, there was a marginal effect of dependence (p = 0.062) and ethnicity (p = 0.052) on changes in alpha-amylase activity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe difference between ex- and current smokers was attenuated but remained significant when excluding those who used e-cigarettes only (OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.38 to 6.11) with 3.5% (95% CI 1.9% to 6.3%, n = 10) of relapsers and 9.5% (95% CI 6.4% to 13.8%, n = 25) of abstainers still using NRT.
“The difference between ex-and current smokers was attenuated but remained significant when excluding those who used e-cigarettes only (OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.38 to 6.11) with 3.5% (95% CI 1.9% to 6.3%, n = 10) of relapsers and 9.5% (95% CI 6.4% to 13.8%, n = 25) of abstainers still using NRT.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThis same analysis found that services were reaching up to 10% of smokers in their area in the year from July 2010, with the majority coming from more-deprived areas.
“This same analysis found that services were reaching up to 10% of smokers in their area in the year from July 2010, with the majority coming from more-deprived areas.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost clients who started on NRT used it for at least 8 weeks and more than one in five (21.5%, 95% CI 18.3% to 25.0%, n = 137) used it for longer than the standard 3 months.
“As can be seen, most clients who started on NRT used it for at least 8 weeks and more than one in five (21.5%, 95% CI 18.3% to 25.0%, n = 137) used it for longer than the standard 3 months.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe use of the nicotine patch appeared particularly prevalent among current smokers, while the use of e-cigarettes, gum and the inhaler was more common among ex-smokers.
“However, the use of the nicotine patch appeared particularly prevalent among current smokers, while the use of e-cigarettes, gum and the inhaler was more common among ex-smokers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPrevalence of NRT use was even lower when excluding participants who used e-cigarettes only (6.0%, 4.3% to 8.3%; n = 35) and use of e-cigarettes was also relatively uncommon (2.9%, 1.8% to 4.7%; n = 18).
“Prevalence of NRT use was even lower when excluding participants who used e-cigarettes only (6.0%, 4.3% to 8.3%; n = 35) and use of e-cigarettes was also relatively uncommon (2.9%, 1.8% to 4.7%; n = 18).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOutcomes were influenced by characteristics of clients and there was also a clear link with service characteristics such as the type of behavioural support received, and the background and training of the smoking cessation practitioner.
“Outcomes were influenced by characteristics of clients and there was also a clear link with service characteristics such as the type of behavioural support received, and the background and training of the smoking cessation practitioner.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNo differences were apparent in alpha-amylase levels at follow-up (p = 0.684), confirmed in adjusted analysis (p = 0.734).
“No differences were apparent in alpha-amylase levels at follow-up (p = 0.684), confirmed in adjusted analysis (p = 0.734).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe vast majority of participants who replied to the questionnaire indicated that they would recommend the service to others and return should the need arise.
“The vast majority of participants who replied to the questionnaire indicated that they would recommend the service to others and return should the need arise.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlthough some predictors of relapse to smoking identified in previous studies did not quite reach significance here (e.g. level of dependence on smoking, lower levels of determination to quit), others did, including deprivation.
“Although some predictors of relapse to smoking identified in previous studies did not quite reach significance here (e.g. level of dependence on smoking, lower levels of determination to quit), others did, including deprivation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn our analysis we did not find that levels of well-being changed significantly over time, unlike a previous systematic review.
“In our analysis we did not find that levels of well-being changed significantly over time, unlike a previous systematic review.50”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] May, 2009, How to examine client satisfaction with stop smoking services: a pilot study in the NHS, J Smok Cessat source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The WHO-5 Well-being Index is a valid measure of well-being.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOpen-group clients were also more positive about staff supportiveness, returning to the service and CO testing.
“Open-group clients were also more positive about staff supportiveness, returning to the service and CO testing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenWell-being was low among many smokers approaching the SSS, and well-being is a predictor of smoking cessation success.
“Well-being was low among many smokers approaching the SSS, and well-being is a predictor of smoking cessation success.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The WHO-5 Well-being Index is a valid measure of well-being.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataDespite many clients finding stop smoking medication easy to acquire, additional comments pointed to a more complex picture where the process of obtaining medication was overcomplicated and time-consuming for some respondents.
“In addition, despite many clients finding stop smoking medication easy to acquire, additional comments pointed to a more complex picture where the process of obtaining medication was overcomplicated and time-consuming for some respondents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIndividuals with higher levels of well-being when they began their quit attempt were more likely to be successful in the longer term, as were those who had fewer smokers in their social network.
“Individuals with higher levels of well-being when they began their quit attempt were more likely to be successful in the longer term, as were those who had fewer smokers in their social networkneither of these findings are surprising but being aware of these factors may be useful for practitioners treating smokers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The WHO-5 Well-being Index is a valid measure of well-being.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataClients attending open groups achieved the highest quit rates and maintained the highest ORs compared with other forms of behavioural support, even after controls.
“Clients attending open groups achieved the highest quit rates and maintained the highest ORs compared with other forms of behavioural support, even after controls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAdditional comments highlighted the importance of practitioner/client rapport.
“Additional comments highlighted the importance of practitioner/client rapport.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn our satisfaction survey of SSS clients, those who responded had a positive experience, and this was true both for those who were successful in stopping smoking and those who were not.
“In our satisfaction survey of SSS clients, we found that those who responded had a positive experience, and this was true both for those who were successful in stopping smoking and those who were not.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThose who had stopped smoking were more likely to be satisfied with staff supportiveness and happier to return to the services if needed, with the information provided and CO validation.
“Those who had stopped smoking were more likely to be satisfied with staff supportiveness and happier to return to the services if needed, with the information provided and CO validation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSuggested improvements to the SSS centred on evening appointment times, having a choice of group or one-to-one support and a longer period of support.
“Suggested improvements to the SSS centred on evening appointment times, having a choice of group or one-to-one support and a longer period of support.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong clients in an open (rolling) group, the self-report 4-week quit rate was 65.5% and the CO-validated quit rate was 52.1%.
“| Open (rolling) group | 4780 | 2.7 | 65.5 | 52.1 | 3130 | 85.3 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataLong-term use of NRT did not appear to have a detrimental effect on the chronic stress response among smokers or ex-smokers and did not increase exposure to nicotine among smokers.
“Long-term use of NRT did not appear to have a detrimental effect on the chronic stress response among smokers or ex-smokers and did not increase exposure to nicotine among smokers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong clients using varenicline only, the self-report 4-week quit rate was 60.2% and the CO-validated quit rate was 43.0%.
“| Varenicline only | 45,149 | 25.5 | 60.2 | 43.0 | 27,167 | 75.8 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataServices were reaching up to 10% of smokers in their area in the year from July 2010, with the majority coming from more deprived areas.
“This same analysis found that services were reaching up to 10% of smokers in their area in the year from July 2010, with the majority coming from more deprived areas.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Smoking declined uniformly by 4% in all PCTs between 2003 and 2005, and also in 2009.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataAssessment of well-being using a standard set of questions could be included in routine monitoring.
“We found that assessment of well-being using a standard set of questions could be included in routine monitoring and that smokers who had higher levels of well-being when they first started attending services were more likely to be non-smokers at 4 weeks and 1 year later.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong clients who attended one session, the self-report quit rate was 19.8% and the CO-validated quit rate was 14.7%.
“| One session | 449 | 14.6 | 19.8 | 14.7 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong clients aged 16-24, the self-report quit rate was 41.2% and the CO-validated quit rate was 24.9%.
“| 16-24 | 330 | 10.8 | 41.2 | 24.9 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong clients using no medication or with missing medication data, the self-report 4-week quit rate was 42.8% and the CO-validated quit rate was 21.0%.
“| No medication or | 18,224 | 10.3 | 42.8 | 21.0 | 7804 | 52.9 |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong clients seen by a nurse, the self-report 4-week quit rate was 42.3% and the CO-validated quit rate was 28.3%.
“| Nurse | 18,091 | 10.2 | 42.3 | 28.3 | 7660 | 69.5 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong clients without a mental health condition, the self-report quit rate was 57.7% and the CO-validated quit rate was 45.0%.
“| Does not have mental health condition | 2583 | 84.2 | 57.7 | 45.0 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong clients seen by a specialist practitioner, the self-report 4-week quit rate was 55.6% and the CO-validated quit rate was 37.7%.
“| Specialist | 55,603 | 31.4 | 55.6 | 37.7 | 30,902 | 74.6 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe finding that combination NRT was not as effective as other medication forms was not carried through into the 52-week results, where results were more consistent with previous research.
“This finding was not carried through into the 52-week results, where we saw results that were more consistent with previous research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingown dataCO-validated quit rates differed significantly by practitioner type (p < 0.001).
“| p-value | - | - | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | - | < 0.001 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong clients aged 65-85, the self-report quit rate was 69.2% and the CO-validated quit rate was 60.8%.
“| 65-85 | 214 | 7.0 | 69.2 | 60.8 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong clients who attended nine or more sessions, the self-report quit rate was 97.3% and the CO-validated quit rate was 84.5%.
“| Nine or more sessions | 374 | 12.2 | 97.3 | 84.5 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong clients with a heart/blood/circulation condition, the self-report quit rate was 61.3% and the CO-validated quit rate was 51.1%.
“| Has heart/blood/circulation condition(s) | 532 | 17.3 | 61.3 | 51.1 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingown dataQuit rates differed significantly by age (p < 0.001).
“| p-value | - | - | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThose who responded to the satisfaction survey were positive about the support they received and would recommend SSSs to others.
“Overall, we found that those who responded to the satisfaction survey were positive about the support they received and would recommend SSSs to others.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong clients using single NRT, the self-report 4-week quit rate was 37.5% and the CO-validated quit rate was 25.4%.
“| Single NRT | 40,607 | 22.9 | 37.5 | 25.4 | 15,222 | 74.0 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingown dataCO-validated quit rates differed significantly by medication used (p < 0.001).
“| p-value | - | - | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | - | < 0.001 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong clients receiving one-to-one intervention, the self-report 4-week quit rate was 47.6% and the CO-validated quit rate was 33.8%.
“| One to one | 140,119 | 79.0 | 47.6 | 33.8 | 66,621 | 74.5 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationGreater alpha-amylase activity at follow-up and an increase in alpha-amylase activity across time were both associated with lower nicotine dependence.
“The somewhat paradoxical finding that greater activity in alpha-amylase at follow-up and an increase in alpha-amylase activity across time were both associated with lower nicotine dependence is likely because tobacco smoke has been shown to acutely inhibit alpha-amylase activity.117”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe secondary analysis of routine data from 49 of 150 services in England found 4-week quit rates of 48% when self-reported data were included, falling to 34% when biochemical validation had occurred.
“The secondary analysis of routine data from 49 of 150 services in England found 4-week quit rates of 48% when self-reported data were included, falling to 34% when biochemical validation had occurred.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong clients with a mental health condition, the self-report quit rate was 50.8% and the CO-validated quit rate was 38.9%.
“| Has mental health condition | 486 | 15.8 | 50.8 | 38.9 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe 4-week quit rate for the prospective study was 41.2%, which is remarkably similar to the quit rate for England from April 2012 to March 2013 (37%).
“However, it is should be remembered that the 4-week quit rate for the prospective study was 41.2%, which is remarkably similar to the quit rate for England from April 2012 to March 2013 (37%) 31 given the impact profile of the PCTs that enrolled in the study (see Chapter 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Health and Social Care Information Centre, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone given8% of clients used the SSS more than once during the year.
“For all but the impact analysis we assumed that each client in the database was unique when we estimated that 8% of clients used the SSS more than once during the year.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAmong CSS responders, 60.4% waited 0-5 days for an appointment.
“| 0-5 | 568 | 60.4 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong clients exempt from prescription charges, the self-report quit rate was 46.2% and the CO-validated quit rate was 33.0%.
“| Exempt | 104,304 | 58.8 | 46.2 | 33.0 | 48,194 | 75.8 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAmong CSS responders, 93.7% found it easy to contact the SSS.
“| Yes | 926 | 93.7 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong clients with a Heaviness of Smoking Index score of 0 (little or no dependence), the self-report quit rate was 67.4% and the CO-validated quit rate was 49.3%.
“| 0 -little or no dependence | 144 | 4.7 | 67.4 | 49.3 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong CO-verified quitters with no self-reported NRT use, mean follow-up cotinine was 45.8 ng/ml, significantly lower than smokers using NRT (280.6 ng/ml) and smokers not using NRT (333.1 ng/ml).
“| Cotinine (ng/ml), mean (SEM) | 280.6 (36.6) a | 333.1 (22.3) a | 324.4 (102.5) | 45.8 (9.7) b,c,d |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAmong CSS responders, 97.0% found the place convenient.
“| Yes | 955 | 97.0 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAmong CSS responders, 95.2% found the appointment time convenient.
“| Yes | 936 | 95.2 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAmong ELONS participants, mentioning Stoptober was associated with lower self-reported quit rate (48.2% vs 56.9%, p<0.001) but no significant difference in CO-validated quit rate (44.4% vs 44.0%, p=0.933).
“| Mentioned Stoptober | 81 | 2.6 | 48.2 | 44.4 |”
- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
“| No mention of Stoptober | 2988 | 97.4 | 56.9 | 44.0 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAmong ELONS participants, having saliva collected was associated with lower self-reported quit rate (54.5% vs 60.0%, p=0.003) and lower CO-validated quit rate (41.5% vs 48.0%, p<0.001) than not having saliva collected.
“| Saliva collected | 1874 | 61.1 | 54.5 | 41.5 |”
- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
“| Saliva not collected | 1195 | 38.9 | 60.0 | 48.0 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the weighted ELONS sample, the short-term (4-week) CO-validated quit rate was 41.3% (95% CI 34.9 to 48.0), self-report not CO validated 12.2% (8.3 to 17.5), relapsed 23.9% (15.8 to 34.5), and lost to follow-up 22.6% (15.1 to 32.4).
“| CO validated | | | | 41.3 (34.9 to 48.0) |”
- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
“| Self-report not CO validated | | | | 12.2 (8.3 to 17.5) |”
- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
“| Relapsed (including quit refuted by CO validation) | | | | 23.9 (15.8 to 34.5) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAmong CSS responders, quitters were more likely to feel welcomed back (88.2% vs 79.2%, p<0.001).
“| Quit (CO validated) | 88.2 | 11.8 |”
- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
“| Not CO validated as quit | 79.2 | 20.8 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn weighted analyses, among clients CO-validated as quit at 4 weeks, 52-week quit rates were higher for those with no medication occasions recorded (44.5%) than for those with four or more occasions (13.3%).
“| No occasions | 16 | 44.5 (6.2 to 90.6) |”
- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
“| Four or more occasions | 613 | 13.3 (10.0 to 17.5) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong ELONS participants, NRT combination use was associated with lower self-reported quit rate (52.1% vs 59.1%) and lower CO-validated quit rate (38.8% vs 46.7%) than not using NRT combination (p<0.001).
“| NRT combination | 962 | 31.4 | 52.1 | 38.8 |”
- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
“| Did not take NRT combination | 2092 | 68.2 | 59.1 | 46.7 |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the prospective study, among clients with a self-assessment of health as not good, the self-report quit rate was 51.1% and the CO-validated quit rate was 38.8%.
“| Not good | 658 | 21.4 | 51.1 | 38.8 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong clients in prison, the self-report quit rate was 48.0% and the CO-validated quit rate was 42.4%.
“| In prison | 2223 | 1.3 | 48.0 | 42.4 | 1066 | 90.0 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong clients with a spouse supporting the quit attempt, the self-report quit rate was 61.1% and the CO-validated quit rate was 48.3%.
“| Spouse supporting attempt | 1556 | 50.7 | 61.1 | 48.3 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataMean WHO-5 well-being scores were higher among quitters than non-quitters at 4 weeks (59.93 vs 51.82) and 52 weeks (65.29 vs 49.01).
“| Quit | 55.48 (53.80 to 57.16) | 59.93 (57.60 to 62.26) | - |”
- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
“| Not quit | 52.62 (51.36 to 53.88) | 56.40 (54.11 to 58.69) | 49.01 (45.72 to 52.31) |”
- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
“| Quit | 59.31 (56.47 to 62.14) | 61.80 (57.82 to 65.77) | 65.29 (61.29 to 69.28) |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAmong ELONS participants, those with 3-10 medication occasions had higher self-reported quit rates (81.5%) than those with 1-2 occasions (38.2%) or no occasions (24.7%) (p<0.001).
“| 1 or 2 occasions | 1614 | 52.6 | 38.2 | 25.8 |”
- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
“| 3-10 occasions | 1349 | 44.0 | 81.5 | 68.1 |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the weighted ELONS sample, the longer-term (52-week) CO-validated quit rate was 7.7% (95% CI 6.6 to 9.0), self-report not CO validated 5.6% (5.1 to 6.1), relapsed at 4 or 52 weeks 41.6% (31.0 to 53.0), and lost to follow-up at 4 or 52 weeks 45.2% (34.6 to 56.2).
“| CO validated | | | | 7.7 (6.6 to 9.0) |”
- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
“| Self-report not CO validated | | | | 5.6 (5.1 to 6.1) |”
- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
“| Relapsed at 4 or 52 weeks (including quit refuted by CO validation) | | 41.6 (31.0 to 53.0) | | |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn unweighted comparison, ELONS 4-week CO-validated quit rate (44.1%) was lower than Nottingham/North Cumbria 2002 (54.6%) and higher than Glasgow 2007 (22.5%).
“| 1. CO-validated quit | 1129 (54.6) | 401 (22.5) | 1349 (44.1) |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong clients who used some form of support in their latest previous attempt, the self-report quit rate was 59.6% and the CO-validated quit rate was 46.1%.
“| Used some form of support | 1045 | 34.1 | 59.6 | 46.1 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe range of well-being scores was between 0 and 100 and so could be viewed as a percentage.
“The range of well-being scores was between 0 and 100 and so could be viewed as a percentage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAmong ELONS participants, varenicline only use was associated with higher CO-validated quit rate (51.9%) than single NRT only (41.6%), combination NRT only (27.1%), and no medication (17.2%), but similar to other/mixed medication (52.0%) (p<0.001).
“| Varenicline only | 1313 | 42.8 | 65.4 | 51.9 |”
- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
“| Single NRT only | 596 | 19.4 | 51.5 | 41.6 |”
- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
“| Combination NRT only | 573 | 18.7 | 40.8 | 27.1 |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the prospective study, among clients with a good level of well-being (WHO-5), the self-report quit rate was 59.9% and the CO-validated quit rate was 47.3%.
“| Good level of well-being | 1325 | 43.2 | 59.9 | 47.3 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong clients without a heart/blood/circulation condition, the self-report quit rate was 55.7% and the CO-validated quit rate was 42.5%.
“| Does not have heart/blood/circulation condition(s) | 2537 | 82.7 | 55.7 | 42.5 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAmong CSS responders, 92.5% found the length of time to appointment acceptable.
“| Yes | 902 | 92.5 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAcross 40 PCTs, the mean throughput was 1487 (SD 521).
“| Throughput | 1487 (521) | - | | - | | - |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAmong ELONS participants, CO-validated quit rates increased with the number of occasions on which medication was recorded, from 17.2% for no occasions to 77.5% for 5-10 occasions (p<0.001).
“| No occasions | 93 | 3.0 | 24.7 | 17.2 |”
- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
“| 5-10 occasions | 338 | 11.0 | 89.9 | 77.5 |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAmong ELONS participants, self-reported quit rates increased with the number of occasions on which medication was recorded, from 24.7% for no occasions to 89.9% for 5-10 occasions (p<0.001).
“| No occasions | 93 | 3.0 | 24.7 | 17.2 |”
- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
“| 5-10 occasions | 338 | 11.0 | 89.9 | 77.5 |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn the prospective study, CO-validated quit rates differed significantly by WHO-5 well-being level (p = 0.002).
“| p-value | - | - | < 0.001 | = 0.002 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAmong CSS responders, quitters were more likely to say they would return to SSS (96.3% vs 89.3%, p<0.001).
“| Quit (CO validated) | 96.3 | 3.7 |”
- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
“| Not CO validated as quit | 89.3 | 10.7 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAmong ELONS participants, lozenge use was associated with lower self-reported quit rate (55.4% vs 57.1%) and lower CO-validated quit rate (40.3% vs 44.8%) than not using lozenge (p<0.001).
“| Took lozenge | 390 | 12.7 | 55.4 | 40.3 |”
- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
“| Did not take Lozenge | 2666 | 86.9 | 57.1 | 44.8 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAmong ELONS participants, taking bupropion was associated with lower CO-validated quit rate (31.3% vs 44.3%, p=0.002) and lower self-reported quit rate (53.1% vs 56.9%, p<0.001) than not taking bupropion.
“| Took bupropion | 32 | 1.0 | 53.1 | 31.3 |”
- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
“| Did not take bupropion | 3024 | 98.5 | 56.9 | 44.3 |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAmong ELONS participants, spray use was associated with lower self-reported quit rate (50.5% vs 57.6%) and lower CO-validated quit rate (35.3% vs 45.2%) than not using spray (p<0.001).
“| Used spray | 303 | 9.9 | 50.5 | 35.3 |”
- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
“| Did not use mouth/nasal spray | 2753 | 89.7 | 57.6 | 45.2 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAmong ELONS participants, inhaler use was associated with lower self-reported quit rate (48.4% vs 58.7%) and lower CO-validated quit rate (36.9% vs 45.8%) than not using inhaler (p<0.001).
“| Used inhaler | 545 | 17.8 | 48.4 | 36.9 |”
- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
“| Did not use an inhalator | 2511 | 81.8 | 58.7 | 45.8 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAmong CSS responders, quitters were more likely to be very satisfied than non-quitters (64.4% vs 51.1%, p=0.001).
“| Quit (CO validated) | 64.4 | 23.8 | 11.8 |”
- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
“| Not CO validated as quit | 51.1 | 33.3 | 15.6 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn weighted analyses, quit rates at 4 and 52 weeks increased with the number of sessions attended, from 9.2% at 4 weeks and 3.4% at 52 weeks for 1 session to 84.0% at 4 weeks and 16.1% at 52 weeks for 9 or more sessions.
“| 1 | 447 | 14.6 | 9.2 (2.3 to 30.0) | 3.4 (0.8 to 13.3) |”
- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
“| 9 or more | 374 | 12.2 | 84.0 (74.7 to 90.3) | 16.1 (10.8 to 23.3) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingown dataCO-validated quit rates were significantly higher among clients with spousal support (p < 0.001).
“| p-value | - | - | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAmong ELONS participants, those with 3-10 medication occasions had higher CO-validated quit rates (68.1%) than those with 1-2 occasions (25.8%) or no occasions (17.2%) (p<0.001).
“| 1 or 2 occasions | 1614 | 52.6 | 38.2 | 25.8 |”
- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
“| 3-10 occasions | 1349 | 44.0 | 81.5 | 68.1 |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong clients with no spousal support, the self-report quit rate was 53.0% and the CO-validated quit rate was 40.3%.
“| No spousal support | 1435 | 46.8 | 53.0 | 40.3 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn adjusted analyses, each additional year of age was associated with higher 4-week (OR 1.032, 95% CI 1.026 to 1.039) and 52-week (OR 1.011, 95% CI 1.002 to 1.020) CO-validated quit.
“| Age (in years) | - | - | 1.032 (1.026 to 1.039) | 1.011 (1.002 to 1.020) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong clients with a Heaviness of Smoking Index score of 6 (higher dependence), the self-report quit rate was 46.4% and the CO-validated quit rate was 36.9%.
“| 6 -higher dependence | 179 | 5.8 | 46.4 | 36.9 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAmong ELONS participants, taking varenicline was associated with higher self-reported quit rate (64.3% vs 50.2%) and CO-validated quit rate (50.7% vs 38.3%) than not taking varenicline (p<0.001).
“| Took varenicline | 1445 | 47.1 | 64.3 | 50.7 |”
- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
“| Did not take varenicline | 1611 | 52.5 | 50.2 | 38.3 |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong clients who paid prescription charges, the self-report quit rate was 54.2% and the CO-validated quit rate was 38.1%.
“| Pays | 56,903 | 32.1 | 54.2 | 38.1 | 30,843 | 74.5 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong clients who used nothing in their latest previous attempt, the self-report quit rate was 45.2% and the CO-validated quit rate was 33.2%.
“| Used nothing in LPA | 208 | 6.8 | 45.2 | 33.2 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAmong ELONS participants, NRT patch use was associated with lower self-reported quit rate (52.7% vs 60.1%) and lower CO-validated quit rate (41.2% vs 46.5%) than not using NRT patch (p<0.001).
“| Used NRT patch | 1321 | 43.0 | 52.7 | 41.2 |”
- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
“| Did not use NRT patch | 1735 | 56.5 | 60.1 | 46.5 |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAmong CSS responders, 41.5% were able to choose group or one-to-one support.
“| Yes | 403 | 41.5 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn adjusted analyses, taking varenicline in week 1 was associated with higher 4-week (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.4 to 1.9) and 52-week (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.3) CO-validated quit than not taking varenicline.
“| Took varenicline | 1396 | 45.7 | 1.6 (1.4 to 1.9) | 1.7 (1.3 to 2.3) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAmong ELONS participants, NRT single use was associated with higher CO-validated quit rate (47.2% vs 42.8%, p=0.024) but not significantly different self-reported quit rate (58.7% vs 56.0%, p=0.168).
“| NRT single | 1003 | 32.7 | 58.7 | 47.2 |”
- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
“| Did not take NRT single | 2051 | 66.8 | 56.0 | 42.8 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the prospective study, among clients with a concerning level of well-being (WHO-5), the self-report quit rate was 55.1% and the CO-validated quit rate was 41.9%.
“| Concerning level of well-being | 1646 | 53.6 | 55.1 | 41.9 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCSS responders had a higher proportion of CO-validated quitters (71.4% vs 44.0%) and males (56.0% vs 44.2%) than the recruited ELONS sample.
“| CO-validated quit | 1350 | 44.0 | 711 | 71.4 |”
- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
“| Male | 1355 | 44.2 | 558 | 56.0 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAmong ELONS participants, varenicline only use was associated with higher self-reported quit rate (65.4%) than single NRT only (51.5%), combination NRT only (40.8%), and no medication (24.7%), but similar to other/mixed medication (65.5%) (p<0.001).
“| Varenicline only | 1313 | 42.8 | 65.4 | 51.9 |”
- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
“| Single NRT only | 596 | 19.4 | 51.5 | 41.6 |”
- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
“| Combination NRT only | 573 | 18.7 | 40.8 | 27.1 |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAmong CSS responders, 87.6% were given an appointment date.
“| Yes | 852 | 87.6 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAmong ELONS participants, gum use was associated with higher self-reported quit rate (59.0% vs 56.7%, p<0.001) but lower CO-validated quit rate (43.7% vs 44.1%, p=0.006) than not using gum.
“| Took gum | 222 | 7.2 | 59.0 | 43.7 |”
- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
“| Did not use gum | 2834 | 92.3 | 56.7 | 44.1 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose LS, McEwen · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the prospective study, among clients with a self-assessment of health as good, the self-report quit rate was 61.9% and the CO-validated quit rate was 47.4%.
“| Good | 1003 | 32.7 | 61.9 | 47.4 |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWell-being analysed as a continuous variable predicted abstinence but not as a dichotomous variable.
“Well-being analysed as a continuous variable did predict abstinence but not as a dichotomous variable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThose providing saliva samples at baseline were younger than those not providing samples.
“As can be seen, those providing samples at baseline were younger, more likely to be male and non-white, and slightly less likely to be cohabiting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThose providing saliva samples at baseline were more likely to be non-white.
“As can be seen, those providing samples at baseline were younger, more likely to be male and non-white, and slightly less likely to be cohabiting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataA total of 258 participants (8.5% of the whole sample) provided baseline and follow-up saliva samples and formed the analytic sample for the biomarker analysis.
“A total of 258 participants (8.5% of the whole sample) provide baseline and follow-up saliva samples and therefore formed the analytic sample for the biomarker analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThose providing saliva samples at baseline were slightly less likely to be cohabiting.
“As can be seen, those providing samples at baseline were younger, more likely to be male and non-white, and slightly less likely to be cohabiting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThose providing saliva samples at baseline were more likely to be male.
“As can be seen, those providing samples at baseline were younger, more likely to be male and non-white, and slightly less likely to be cohabiting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThose providing saliva samples at baseline were less likely to have used varenicline.
“There were also some differences in the treatment sought (they were less likely to have used varenicline or gone to a drop-in clinic) but there were few differences in terms of smoking characteristics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThose providing saliva samples at baseline were less likely to have gone to a drop-in clinic.
“There were also some differences in the treatment sought (they were less likely to have used varenicline or gone to a drop-in clinic) but there were few differences in terms of smoking characteristics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIt is possible for clients who relapse to have more than one treatment episode in a year.
“It is possible for clients who relapse to have more than one treatment episode in a year.33”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Department of Health (DH), 2011
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLarge differences have been identified between the quit rates achieved by services in different locations, which may be partly because of the quality of behavioural support delivered by the practitioner who offers it.
“Large differences have now been identified between the quit rates achieved by services in different locations, which may be partly because of the quality of behavioural support delivered by the practitioner who offers it.[26][27][28]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [26] Hiscock, 2013, Behavioural therapy for smoking cessation: the effectiveness of different intervention types for disadvantaged and affluent smokers, Addict Behav source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [27] Brose, 2012, Does it matter who you see to help you stop smoking? Short-term quit rates across specialist stop smoking practitioners in England, Addiction source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [28] Bauld, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIncreasingly, Stop Smoking Services outsource management of routine data to private companies, most commonly QuitManager.
“Increasingly, however, SSS outsource management of these data to private companies.The most commonly used is QuitManager (North 51, Nottingham, UK).7,27”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [7] Brose, 2011, What makes for an effective stop-smoking service?, Thorax source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [27] Brose, 2012, Does it matter who you see to help you stop smoking? Short-term quit rates across specialist stop smoking practitioners in England, Addiction source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenTo understand the reach of services it is necessary to know the target population: the number of smokers in the primary care trust.
“To understand the reach of services it is necessary to know the target population: the number of smokers in the PCT.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningCases were excluded if the practitioner who provided behavioural support was missing (n = 5573) because of the multilevel structure of the data.
“Additionally, cases were excluded if the practitioner who provided behavioural support was missing (n = 5573) because of the multilevel structure of the data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIt was not possible to calculate impact for some primary care trusts and for others there were caveats, generally where there were issues in calculating uptake.
“It was not possible to calculate impact for some PCTs and for others there were caveats, generally this was where there were issues in calculating uptake.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe 61.5% figure for reported NRT use during the quit attempt likely includes over-the-counter use, because it is substantially higher than the 34.4% recorded as using NRT by the services.
“However, this is likely to include over-the-counter use, as this number is substantially higher than the number of participants recorded as using NRT by the services (34.4%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningOwing to marked differences between carbon monoxide validation rates of primary care trusts and different services having a negative impact depending on whether the carbon monoxide validated or self-report quit rate was used, an overall impact score was calculated as the average of the carbon monoxide validated impact score and the self-report impact score.
“Owing to first to marked differences between CO-validation rates of PCTs and second to different services having a negative impact depending on whether or not the CO-validated or the self-report quit rate was used in the calculation, for this report an overall impact score was calculated.The overall impact score was the average of the CO-validated impact score and the self-report impact score.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningClients setting quit dates in December 2010 and June 2011 were excluded because they would not have reached 4 weeks post quit date when the data were downloaded.
“Clients setting quit dates in December 2010 and June 2011 were therefore excluded from the analysis as they would not have reached 4 weeks post quit date (when self-report quit and CO validation occurs) when the data were downloaded.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenColleagues from University College London and the UK National Centre for Smoking Cessation and Training developed the methodology for measuring impact.
“Colleagues from University College London and the UK NCSCT have developed the methodology for measuring impact.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenPrimary care trusts may elect not to ask clients questions, and clients may not answer every question, leading to missing data.
“PCTs may elect not to ask clients questions, and clients themselves may not answer every question, leading to missing data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe Department of Health considers clients to be quitters only if self-report data are collected between 25 and 42 days after the quit date.
“The DH considers clients to be quitters only if self-report data are collected between 25 and 42 days after the quit date.33”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Department of Health (DH), 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDepartment of Health guidelines suggest 85% of clients should be carbon monoxide validated.
“The DH guidelines suggest 85% of clients should be CO validated.33”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Department of Health (DH), 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningBetween 2004 and 2009 the smoking rate for Great Britain fell from 25% to 21%, so primary care trust smoking rate estimates were reduced by 4% to estimate more recent smoking rates.
“Between 2004 and 2009 the smoking rate for Great Britain fell from 25% to 21%, thus PCT smoking rate estimates were reduced by 4% to estimate more recent smoking rates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningSelf-report quit was included because carbon monoxide validation rates vary, so using both outcomes renders the results more robust.
“We included self-report quit because some CO-validation rates vary so by using both of these outcomes, the results are rendered more robust.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA previous national evaluation of NHS Stop Smoking Services in England found that the services were effective in supporting smokers to quit in the short term (at 4 weeks) and the longer term (at 1 year), and were reaching smokers from more deprived groups.
“The evaluation found that the services were effective in supporting smokers to quit in the short term (at 4 weeks) 17 and the longer term (at 1 year), 18 and were reaching smokers from more deprived groups.19”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [17] Judge, 2005, The English smoking treatment services: short-term outcomes, Addiction source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [18] Ferguson, 2005, The English smoking treatment services: one-year outcomes, Addiction source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] Chesterman, 2005, How effective are the English smoking treatment services in reaching disadvantaged smokers?, Addiction source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe data have a multilevel structure: clients received behavioural support interventions from practitioners and practitioners are employed through Stop Smoking Services.
“The data have a multilevel structure: clients received behavioural support interventions from practitioners and practitioners are employed through SSSs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataServices are continuing to effectively reach smokers and support them to stop.
“These results provide a useful indicator that (a) routine data provide a helpful and not inaccurate indicator of short-term smoking cessation outcomes and (b) services are continuing to effectively reach smokers and support them to stop.”
- Also stated in: § Short-and longer-term cessation rates in context · plain
“and (b) services are continuing to effectively reach smokers and support them to stop.”
- Also stated in: § Chapter 11 Conclusions · hedged
“These results provide a useful indicator that (a) routine data provide a helpful and not inaccurate indicator of short-term smoking cessation outcomes and (b) services are continuing to effectively reach smokers and support them to stop.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 49 services providing routine data are representative of all 150 NHS Stop Smoking Services in England.
- Rests on an assumption: The nine prospective study services are representative of all NHS Stop Smoking Services in England.
- Also stated in: § Short-and longer-term cessation rates in context · plain
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisereasoningCarbon monoxide validated quit was included because some clients may state they have quit when they have not quit.
“We included CO-validated quit because some clients may state they have quit when they have not quit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningCases were excluded from the main analysis if they were missing age (n = 201) and gender (n = 43) because too few were missing to include as a separate category.
“Cases were also excluded from the main analysis if they were missing age (n = 201) and gender (n = 43) because too few were missing to include as a separate category.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenSmoking is not asked in the UK census, so estimates have to be made from smoking rates collected by government surveys and populations updated from 2001 census data.
“Smoking is not asked in the UK census thus estimates have to be made from smoking rates collected by government surveys and populations that have been updated from 2001 census data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisereasoningFor self-reported quits minus 35 is used because of average differences between Stop Smoking Service self-report and carbon monoxide validated quit rates.
“For self-reported quits minus 35 is used because of average differences between SSS self-report and CO-validated quit rates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIt is possible that other primary care trusts may not include all their clients on QuitManager, but none of the other primary care trusts contacted regarding the prospective study raised this as an issue.
“It is possible that other PCTs may not include all their clients on QuitManager.So far, however, none of the other PCTs contacted regarding the prospective study have raised this as an issue.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenWithin primary care trusts, clients whose data are collected on paper forms may answer a slightly different set of questions to those whose data are entered electronically.
“Within PCTs clients whose data are collected on paper forms may answer a slightly different set of questions to those whose data are entered electronically.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationQuitManager is an online database for recording information on NHS Stop Smoking Service clients, including sociodemographic and treatment characteristics, in accordance with Department of Health standard monitoring requirements.
“QuitManager 32 is an online database for recording information on NHS SSS clients, including sociodemographic and treatment characteristics, in accordance with the DH's standard SSS monitoring requirements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] North 51, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenOriginally each primary care trust had its own Stop Smoking Service although now some primary care trusts have a joint Stop Smoking Service so a few practitioners worked for more than one primary care trust.
“Originally each PCT had its own SSS although now some PCTs have a joint SSS so a few practitioners worked for more than one PCT, usually where both PCTs had a joint SSS.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given25% of smokers trying to quit are estimated to be carbon monoxide verified quit at 4 weeks unaided or by use of medication alone without behavioural support.
“The reason for CO-verified quit minus 25 being used in the calculation is that 25% of smokers trying to quit are estimated to be CO-verified quit at 4 weeks unaided or by use of medication alone without behavioural support.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataDifferences between these months and the other months were not always significant, suggesting this had a minimal effect.
“However, differences between these months and the other months were not always significant, suggesting this had a minimal effect.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataIn preliminary analysis, MLwiN IGLS multilevel models were compared with Stata Survey Suite models.
“In preliminary analysis (not shown) MLwiN IGLS multilevel models were compared with Stata Survey Suite models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe results that were produced tended to support IGLS results, so only MLwiN IGLS models are presented.
“However, the results that were produced tended to support IGLS results; thus only MLwiN IGLS models are presented here.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningLower chances of quitting in May and November might partly be because of late quit information not being included in the database owing to cut off points at the end of December and June.
“Lower chances of quitting in May and November might partly be because of late quit information not being included in the database owing to cut off points at the end of December and June.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataFurther analysis suggested that the majority of GPs worked in one primary care trust (Warwickshire) where quit rates were similar to other practitioner types, but in most other primary care trusts, with more than 20 clients seen by GPs, GPs were achieving fewer carbon monoxide validated quits than other practitioner types.
“Further analysis (not shown) suggested this was because the majority of GPs worked in one PCT (Warwickshire) where quit rates were similar to other practitioner types, but in most other PCTs, with more than 20 clients seen by GPs, GPs were achieving fewer CO-validated quits than other practitioner types.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningSo that practitioner should completely nest within a primary care trust, primary care trusts that shared practitioners were merged; there were 63 practitioners who worked in more than one primary care trust.
“So that practitioner should completely nest within a PCT, PCTs that shared practitioners were merged.There were 63 practitioners who worked in more than one PCT.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataFurther analysis suggested this was caused by a number of factors such as the practitioner, socioeconomic status and medication.
“Further analysis (not shown) suggested this was caused by a number of factors such as the practitioner, SES and medication.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAll variance inflation factors and tolerances were below 3.20, so there was no significant multicollinearity in the data.
“All were below 3.20, so there was no significant multicollinearity in the data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Department of Health has recommended that Stop Smoking Services should aim to carbon monoxide validate 85% of clients.
“The DH has recommended that SSSs should aim to CO validate 85% of clients.33”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Department of Health (DH), 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataThe graph suggests that impact is more strongly related to quit rates than throughput.
“The graph suggests that impact is more strongly related to quit rates than throughput.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAll variance inflation factors were below 2.54 for self-reported and carbon monoxide validated models, so there was no significant multicollinearity in the data.
“All vifs were below 2.54 for self-reported and CO-validated models so there was no significant multicollinearity in the data (concerns are raised if a vif is ≥ 10).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataOdds ratios for Index of Multiple Deprivation at primary care trust level and multilevel variance changes suggested that some primary care trusts were having a disproportionate effect on the results, as an intermediate quintile was most associated with quitting and including this variable in the model was associated with a major reduction in primary care trust-level variance.
“Odds ratios for IMD at PCT level and multilevel variance changes suggested that some PCTs were having a disproportionate effect on the results, as an intermediate quintile was most associated with quitting (see Table 4) and including this variable in the model was associated with a major reduction in PCT-level variance (see Table 7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe Stop Smoking Services target is at least 35% for self-report and carbon monoxide validated quit.
“The SSSs target is at least 35% for self-report and CO-validated quit.33”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Department of Health (DH), 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataFurther exploration suggested that the change in the multivariable results was attributed to pregnant women being less likely to take medication.
“Further exploration (not shown) suggested that the change in the multivariable results was attributed to pregnant women being less likely to take medication.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe analysis included a large number of predictors and three measures of socioeconomic status, so variance inflation factor and corresponding tolerance were calculated from a logistic regression using interaction expansion to assess potential multicollinearity.
“The analysis included a large number of predictors and three measures of SES, so in order to assess potential multicollinearity in multivariable models, the variance inflation factor (vif) and corresponding tolerance were calculated from a logistic regression using interaction expansion (part of the Stata xi suite).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningMultilevel modelling allows primary care trust and practitioner to be treated as separate levels (random effects), giving three levels in the models: client, practitioner and primary care trust.
“Multilevel modelling (see Tables 5 and 6) allows PCT and practitioner to be treated as separate levels in the analysisotherwise known as random effects.Thus there were three levels in the models: client (level 1), practitioner (level 2) and PCT (level 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThis quit rate was based on the previous evaluation of long-term outcomes of the English services.
“This quit rate was based on the previous evaluation of long-term outcomes of the English services.18”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Ferguson, 2005, The English smoking treatment services: one-year outcomes, Addiction source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenInitial power calculations suggested that we needed data from quit attempts made by 5000 individuals, with at least 370 quit attempts within each behavioural support type with 90% power and an average quit rate of 15%.
“In order to compare behavioural support types, initial power calculations suggested that we needed data from quit attempts made by 5000 individuals, with at least 370 quit attempts within each behavioural support type with 90% power and an average quit rate of 15%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe NIHR HTA agreed the revised sample size of 3000 and the study was also granted a 7-month extension to allow us to successfully recruit this number of participants.
“The NIHR HTA agreed the revised sample size of 3000 and the study was also granted a 7-month extension to allow us to successfully recruit this number of participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningIn consultation with the chairperson of the NIHR Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Board and statistical practitioner we revised our sample size calculation to a more realistic target sample of 3000, which allowed us to maintain a sufficient level of power to detect meaningful effect sizes between the intervention groups (90% to 80% power).
“Therefore, in consultation with the chairperson of the NIHR Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Board and statistical practitioner we revised our sample size calculation to a more realistic target sample of 3000, which allowed us to maintain a sufficient level of power to detect meaningful effect sizes between the intervention groups (90% to 80% power).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe self-report quit rate used was not as narrow as the DH quit rate regarding time of data collection but was more stringent in that it was an intention-to-treat analysis.
“It must be noted that the self-report quit rate used was not as narrow as the DH quit rate regarding time of data collection but was more stringent in that it was an intention-to-treat analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataSometimes the chi-squared test result was invalid owing to low numbers of expected cases in cells, in which case significance was recorded as p = not available.
“Sometimes the chi-squared test result was invalid owing to low numbers of expected cases in cells, in which case significance was recorded as p = not available.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe Research Ethics Committee required a consent form for each client with a section relating to each element of the study.
“For the ELONS study, the Research Ethics Committee required a consent form for each client with a section relating to each element of the study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenWe have taken a finding to be significant at the traditional p < 0.05 level.
“We have taken a finding to be significant at the traditional p < 0.05 level.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationLevel 2 provision has grown over the past decade and thus it was important to involve these providers as well as specialists.
“Level 2 provision has grown over the past decade 44 and thus it was important to involve these providers as well as specialists.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] McDermott, 2013, Factors associated with differences in quit rates between ‘specialist’ and ‘community’ stop-smoking practitioners in the English stop-smoking services, Nicotine Tob Res source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn the previous English longer-term evaluation, clients were included in a study only if they 'set a quit date'.
“In the previous English longer-term evaluation, 18 clients were included in a study only if they 'set a quit date'”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Ferguson, 2005, The English smoking treatment services: one-year outcomes, Addiction source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPCTs with a better throughput did have a higher increase in the number of self-reported smokers in the population but such PCTs were not CO validating sufficiently to be sure that the number of ex-smokers is increasing with a higher number of clients.
“Thus, PCTs with a better throughput did have a higher increase in the number of self-reported smokers in the population but such PCTs were not CO validating sufficiently to be sure that the number of ex-smokers is increasing with a higher number of clients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe ELONS study added additional time to each consultation, which affected the number of people that the service could see.
“This meant that the ELONS study added additional time to each consultation, which affected the number of people that the service could see.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationOpen group forms of behavioural therapy were more successful than one-to-one counselling [main effect aOR 1.26 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.41)] except among some of the most disadvantaged clients (prisons and long-term unemployed).
“but open group forms of behavioural therapy were more successful [main effect aOR 1.26 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.41)] except among some of the most disadvantaged clients (prisons and long-term unemployed).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Hiscock, 2013, Behavioural therapy for smoking cessation: the effectiveness of different intervention types for disadvantaged and affluent smokers, Addict Behav source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe North 51 PCTs that allowed their data for research purposes comprised roughly one-quarter of the total and have similar self-report quit and CO-validation rates.
“Thus, the North 51 PCTs that allowed their data for research purposes comprised roughly one-quarter of the total and have similar self-report quit and CO-validation rates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe decline continued after recruitment was completed, and much or at least some of this has been attributed to more smokers using electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) for cutting down or quitting rather than more established methods.
“The decline continued after recruitment was completed, and much or at least some of this has been attributed to more smokers using electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) for cutting down or quitting rather than more established methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The decline in quit dates set in SSSs in England after recruitment was completed is attributed to more smokers using electronic cigarettes for cutting down or quitting rather than more established methods.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe level of support available did vary across the nine ELONS study sites.
“However, as PCRNs are organised by area and each have their own budget, the level of support available did vary across the nine ELONS study sites.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenClients who had agreed to be recruited to the ELONS study but where there was no record of quit date set were included in the analysis.
“Clients who had agreed to be recruited to the ELONS study but where there was no record of quit date set were included in the analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenIn order for our PCTs to be representative we also approached services with a range of short-term (4 week) quit rates and geographies (urban and rural areas, affluent and disadvantaged areas, and include areas from most regions of England).
“In order for our PCTs to be representative we also approached services with a range of short-term (4 week) quit rates and geographies (urban and rural areas, affluent and disadvantaged areas, and include areas from most regions of England).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe self-reported quit rate for all English SSSs from April 2010 to March 2011 was 49%, with 70% of these CO validated.
“The self-reported quit rate for all English SSSs from April 2010 to March 2011 was also 49%, with 70% of these CO validated 43”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] NHS Information Centre, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationClosed groups were little deployed and they were not significantly more successful than one-to-one behavioural therapy after controls.
“Closed groups were little deployed and they were not significantly more successful than one-to-one behavioural therapy after controls.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Hiscock, 2013, Behavioural therapy for smoking cessation: the effectiveness of different intervention types for disadvantaged and affluent smokers, Addict Behav source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningAs the requirements for detailed consent (along with the other pressures on services outlined above) meant that it was not possible to recruit a high proportion of clients, weighting was undertaken to correct for non-response so that the quit rates would take into account any differences in important variables such as demographics between the ELONS study sample and the population.
“As the requirements for detailed consent (along with the other pressures on services outlined above) meant that it was not possible to recruit a high proportion of clients, weighting was undertaken to correct for non-response so that the quit rates would take into account any differences in important variables such as demographics between the ELONS study sample and the population.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe same rim weights were used for the 12-month quit rates as the 4-week quit rates to allow our estimates to be generalisable to the nine services that took part in the ELONS study.
“The same rim weights were used for the 12-month quit rates as the 4-week quit rates to allow our estimates to be generalisable to the nine services that took part in the ELONS study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe weights were created using these variables: behavioural support type, age, gender and SES (measured by NSSEC).
“The weights were created using these variables: behavioural support type, age, gender and SES (measured by NSSEC).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThus in the final models two levels were included: the first level was client quit attempt and the second level was practitioner.
“Thus in the final models two levels were included: the first level was client quit attempt and the second level was practitioner.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataConcerns arose that the true importance of being dependent might be missed if the Heaviness of Smoking Index was used to represent dependence in the analysis, so instead a dichotomous variable was used: clients who smoked > 30 cigarettes per day or who smoked within 5 minutes of waking were coded as dependent and contrasted with all other clients.
“Thus concerns arose that the true importance of being dependent might be missed if the Heaviness of Smoking Index was used to represent dependence in the analysis, so instead a dichotomous variable was used: clients who smoked > 30 cigarettes per day or who smoked within 5 minutes of waking were coded as dependent and contrasted with all other clients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningAs an alternative, quit rates were calculated taking into account clustering by location.
“As an alternative, quit rates were calculated taking into account clustering by location.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe 'all cases' database was used to develop weights in order to calculate quit rates generalisable to the nine services that took part in the ELONS study.
“The 'all cases' database was used to develop weights in order to calculate quit rates generalisable to the nine services that took part in the ELONS study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThis may be because one of the more successful sites and the only user of open groups used very little combination NRT.
“This may be because one of the more successful sites and the only user of open groups used very little combination NRT.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationWeighting is not recommended in multilevel modelling, including variables where differential recruitment has occurred is preferred. Thus all final models using prospective study data needed to include behavioural support types and locations.
“Weighting is not recommended in multilevel modelling, including variables where differential recruitment has occurred is preferred.46 Thus all final models using prospective study data needed to include behavioural support types and locations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] Salmond, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataPractitioner had the ELONS study clients who did not set a quit date (non-significant in multivariable analysis).
“l Practitioner had the ELONS study clients who did not set a quit date (non-significant in multivariable analysis).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationClients lost to follow-up were coded as still smoking, consistent with conducting an intention-to-treat analysis as set out in the Russell Standard.
“Clients lost to follow-up were coded as still smoking, consistent with conducting an intention-to-treat analysis as set out in the Russell Standard.30”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] West
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataMulticollinearity was not present in the multivariable model; the standard error did not increase by 50% or more.
“If the standard error increased by 50% or more multicollinearity was present.This did not occur.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataWe also intended to weight for location (study site) but there were large differences in proportions recruited by location, which led to instability in the weighting and so the decision was made to exclude this, with behavioural support used to explain some of the differences by location.
“We also intended to weight for location (study site) but there were large differences in proportions recruited by location, which led to instability in the weighting and so the decision was made to exclude this, with behavioural support used to explain some of the differences by location.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe model was then tested for multicollinearity by comparing the size of the CI when each variable was added individually with the CI when each variable was added simultaneously. If the standard error increased by 50% or more multicollinearity was deemed to be present. This did not occur.
“The model was then tested for multicollinearity by comparing the size of the CI when each variable was added individually with the CI when each variable was added simultaneously.46 If the standard error increased by 50% or more multicollinearity was deemed to be present.46 This did not occur.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] Salmond, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataSerious previous quit attempt with or without quitting aids (clients who had made a quit attempt in the last 12 months but had not used aids were less likely to quit than both those who had not made a quit attempt and those who had made a quit attempt with quitting aids. Owing to the non-intuitive results and the desire for simplicity, this variable was excluded).
“l Serious previous quit attempt with or without quitting aids (clients who had made a quit attempt in the last 12 months but had not used aids were less likely to quit than both those who had not made a quit attempt and those who had made a quit attempt with quitting aids.Owing to the non-intuitive results and the desire for simplicity, this variable was excluded).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataVarenicline at week 1 was measured because abstinence from smoking was strongly associated with higher numbers of records of smoking medication and clients who had more records had more opportunity to change medication.
“Varenicline at week 1 was measured because abstinence from smoking was strongly associated with higher numbers of records of smoking medication and clients who had more records had more opportunity to change medication”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenData were collected from all nine study sites.
“Data were collected from all nine study sites.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataFour other fixed effects were tested because preliminary bivariable analysis suggested they might be of importance but were excluded from the final model: Marital status (non-significant in multivariable analysis).
“Four other fixed effects were tested because preliminary bivariable analysis (see Chapter 6) suggested they might be of importance but were excluded from the final model: l Marital status (non-significant in multivariable analysis).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThere were potentially five levels: client quit attempt; client (only 22 clients were recruited to the ELONS study twice, so the client level was not included); practitioner; service provider (the models failed to run because of conflicts with practitioner and location); location (there was no significant level 2 variance as there were only nine locations, so location was included as a fixed效应).
“There were potentially five levels: l client quit attempt l clientonly 22 clients were recruited to the ELONS study twice, so the client level was not included l practitioner l service providerthe models failed to run because of conflicts with practitioner and location l locationthere was no significant level 2 variance as there were only nine locations, so location was included as a fixed effect.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataWe could not explore this further because of multicollinearity between site and medication.
“We could not explore this further because of multicollinearity between site and medication.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningWe cannot tell from the chi-squared tests whether there were significant differences in quitting by self-assessed health or well-being.
“Thus we cannot tell from the chi-squared tests whether or not there were significant differences in quitting by self-assessed health or well-being.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataSaliva collected (non-significant in multivariable analysis).
“l Saliva collected (non-significant in multivariable analysis).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe power calculations were based on a quit rate of 15% rather than 8%.
“Furthermore, the power calculations were based on a quit rate of 15% rather than 8%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenInitially, the sample design was powered so that the smallest group size was 100 and the next group size was 500.
“Initially, the sample design was powered so that the smallest group size was 100 and the next group size was 500.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe finding that combination NRT was associated with lower 4-week quit is not consistent with evidence on the effectiveness of combination NRT and raises questions about the recording of combination therapy use in the study.
“This is not consistent with evidence on the effectiveness of combination NRT and raises some questions about the recording of combination therapy use in the study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe quit rate for England from April 2012 to March 2013 was 37%.
“In comparison, the quit rate for England from April 2012 to March 2013 was 37%. 31”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Health and Social Care Information Centre, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningClients who were motivated to complete the survey were also more likely to have had a successful quit attempt, meaning the views of those who did not quit are under-represented.
“Finally, despite an encouraging response rate (response to self-completion postal surveys are generally low, even with repeated reminders) clients who were motivated to complete the survey were also more likely to have had a successful quit attempt.This means the views of those who did not quit are under-represented.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCutting down with NRT is associated with both increased motivation to stop and improved quit rates.
“Cutting down with NRT is associated with both increased motivation to stop and improved quit rates 64,66”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [64] Wang, 2008, Cut down to quit with nicotine replacement therapies in smoking cessation: a systematic review of effectiveness and economic analysis, Health Technol Assess source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [66] Beard, 2011, Association between use of nicotine replacement therapy for harm reduction and smoking cessation: a prospective study of English smokers, Tob Control source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNRT in the UK is licensed for smoking reduction, that is, dual use, and available to smokers who cannot or are unwilling to stop smoking completely, as a long-term harm reduction measure.
“For this reason, NRT in the UK is licensed for smoking reduction, that is, dual use, and available to smokers who cannot or are unwilling to stop smoking completely, as a long-term harm reduction measure 70”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [70] Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataServices could ask about well-being if useful for monitoring purposes.
“This suggests services could ask about well-being if useful for monitoring purposes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningIn clinical trials, NRT is provided free together with behavioural support, which may affect normal usage patterns.
“and in which NRT is provided free together with behavioural support, which may affect normal usage patterns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMost data on long-term NRT use come from clinical trials, which have samples that tend to differ in important ways from general population samples.
“Most data come from clinical trials, which have samples that tend to differ in important ways from general population samples 79”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [79] Le Strat, 2011, How generalisable to community samples are clinical trial results for treatment of nicotine dependence: a comparison of common eligibility criteria with respondents of a large representative general population survey, Tob Control source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationStudies that have looked at long-term NRT use suggest it is safe and any associated health risks are small, certainly compared with continued smoking.
“the studies that have looked at this issue suggest that long-term NRT use is safe and any associated health risks are small, 76 certainly compared with continued smoking.77,78”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [76] Eliasson, 1996, Long-term use of nicotine gum is associated with hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance, Circulation source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [77] Murray, 2009, Does nicotine replacement therapy cause cancer? Evidence from the Lung Health Study, Nicotine Tob Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [78] Sims, 2002, Pharmacotherapy for treating tobacco dependence: what is the ideal duration of therapy?, CNS Drugs source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe WHO-5 Well-being Index was integrated successfully into routine questions asked of service clients at baseline.
“The WHO-5 Well-being Index was integrated successfully into routine questions asked of service clients at baseline.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The WHO-5 Well-being Index is a valid measure of well-being.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe burning of tobacco causes the most harm and not nicotine per se.
“The reason for focusing on NRT is that the burning of tobacco causes the most harm and not nicotine per se.73”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [73] Stratton, 2001
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMost NRT in the UK is used without advice and bought over the counter.
“By contrast, most NRT in the UK is used without advice and bought over the counter, 80”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [80] Shiffman, 2008, Ten years after the Rx-to-OTC switch of nicotine replacement therapy: what have we learned about the benefits and risks of non-prescription availability?, Health Policy source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThis request to provide a saliva sample resulted in 1875 useable saliva samples for analysis (which represents 61% of the ELONS study participants).
“This request to provide a saliva sample resulted in 1875 useable saliva samples for analysis (which represents 61% of the ELONS study participants).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere is good evidence from population studies and clinical trials that providing NRT to smokers who cut down their cigarette consumption results in more sustained decreases in cigarette consumption and improves their chances of stopping smoking completely.
“There is good evidence from both population studies and clinical trials that the provision of NRT to smokers who cut down their cigarette consumption results in more sustained decreases in cigarette consumption and improves their chances of stopping smoking completely.64,65”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [64] Wang, 2008, Cut down to quit with nicotine replacement therapies in smoking cessation: a systematic review of effectiveness and economic analysis, Health Technol Assess source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [65] Moore, 2009, Effectiveness and safety of nicotine replacement therapy assisted reduction to stop smoking: systematic review and meta-analysis, BMJ source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataA random sample (n = 392) of participants who had given a saliva sample at baseline and were known to have relapsed at 4-week follow-up were contacted at 12-month follow-up and asked to provide a saliva sample; this resulted in saliva samples from 89 participations.
“In addition a random sample (n = 392) of participants who had given a saliva sample at baseline and were known to have relapsed at 4-week follow-up were contacted at 12-month follow-up and asked to provide a saliva sample.This resulted in saliva samples from 89 participations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe ELONS study was designed to provide up-to-date evidence on the effectiveness of these SSSs, building on earlier research.
“The ELONS study was designed to provide up-to-date evidence on the effectiveness of these SSSs, building on earlier research.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThis estimate is likely to include over-the-counter use, as this number is substantially higher than the number of participants recorded as using NRT by the services (34.4%, 95% CI 31.4% to 37.4%; n = 310).
“However, this estimate is likely to include over-the-counter use, as this number is substantially higher than the number of participants recorded as using NRT by the services as shown in Table 41 (34.4%, 95% CI 31.4% to 37.4%; n = 310).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningDespite rates of abstinence from smoking being lower in the ELONS study than in some previous studies with service clients, they remain significantly higher than in untreated populations.
“Despite rates of abstinence from smoking being lower in the ELONS study than in some previous studies with service clients, they remain significantly higher than in untreated populations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningAs we were concerned about the potential of confounders, we conducted a sensitivity analysis to assess the impact of these on the results.
“As we were concerned about the potential of confounders, we conducted a sensitivity analysis to assess the impact of these on the results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe study took place during the financial year 2012-13. In that year, routine data returns from all SSSs in England showed that 724,247 quit dates were set.
“The study took place during the financial year 2012-13.In that year, routine data returns from all SSSs in England showed that 724,247 quit dates were set.87”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [87] Health and Social Care Information Centre, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThus the behavioural support and stop smoking medication provided by the services makes a significant difference and improves outcomes for individual smokers.
“Thus the behavioural support and stop smoking medication provided by the services makes a significant difference and improves outcomes for individual smokers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe ELONS study is consistent with previous studies in demonstrating this.
“The ELONS study is consistent with previous studies in demonstrating this.7,17”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningResearch design differences between the studies may also explain some of the difference.
“Research design differences between the studies may also explain some of the difference.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataA total of 1047 participants (34.4% of the whole sample) provided information on long-term NRT use and therefore form the analytic sample for the prevalence analysis.
“A total of 1047 participants (34.4% of the whole sample) provided information on long-term NRT use and therefore form the analytic sample for the prevalence analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataAt 12-month follow-up, saliva samples were obtained from 169 of a potential 320 participants (i.e. those who took part in the follow-up telephone interview, were abstinent from smoking and had given a saliva sample at baseline).
“At 12-month follow-up, salvia samples were obtained from 169 of a potential 320 participants (i.e.those who took part in the follow-up telephone interview, were abstinent from smoking and had given a saliva sample at baseline).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataSome samples provided insufficient saliva or were contaminated and, therefore, cotinine and/or alpha-amylase levels could not be determined (5.7%). In addition, a number of participants (18.1%) provided only one rather than two saliva samples at either baseline or follow-up, which meant not all analytes could be assessed. However, in each of the relevant subgroups at least 50% of the analytic样本
“Unfortunately, some samples provided insufficient saliva or were contaminated and, therefore, cotinine and/or alpha-amylase levels could not be determined (5.7%).In addition, a number of participants (18.1%) provided only one rather than two saliva samples at either baseline or follow-up, which meant not all analytes could be assessed.However, in each of the relevant subgroups at least 50% of the”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningGiven the complexity of study design, respondents were treated in the analysis according to their last status, that is, relapsers at 4 weeks who had stopped smoking by the 12-month follow-up were counted as quitters, and self-reported quitters at 12-months who failed CO assessment were counted as relapsers and analysed accordingly.
“Please note that given the complexity of study design, respondents were treated in the analysis according to their last status, that is, relapsers at 4 weeks who had stopped smoking by the 12-month follow-up were counted as quitters, and self-reported quitters at 12-months who failed CO assessment were counted as relapsers and analysed accordingly.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOthers have argued that the smoking population itself may have changed and that remaining smokers are more nicotine dependent and find it harder to stop.
“Others have argued that the smoking population itself may have changed 84,85 and that remaining smokers are more nicotine dependent and find it harder to stop.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [84] Jarvis, 2003, Prevalence of hardcore smoking in England, and associated attitudes and beliefs: cross sectional study, BMJ source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [85] MacIntosh, 2006, Characteristics and prevalence of hardcore smokers attending UK general practitioners, BMC Fam Pract source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe ELONS study only assessed smoking status up to 1 year after an initial quit attempt, yet it is possible to extrapolate our results to estimate the number of life-long non-smokers achieved.
“The ELONS study only assessed smoking status up to 1 year after an initial quit attempt, yet it is possible to extrapolate our results to estimate the number of life-long non-smokers achieved.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningWe used a generalised linear model, which enabled adjustment for potential confounders with a gamma distribution and a log link (all 0 values were replaced with 0.001) to account for the non-normal distribution.
“We used a generalised linear model, which enabled adjustment for potential confounders with a gamma distribution and a log link (all 0 values were replaced with 0.001) to account for the non-normal distribution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenStatistical significance was set at the standard level (p < 0.05), and the Bonferroni correction was applied in post-hoc analyses.
“Statistical significance was set at the standard level (p < 0.05), and the Bonferroni correction was applied in post-hoc analyses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThose who were lost at follow-up were younger, had smoked for a shorter period of time, were less likely to have a medical condition and were less likely to be white or cohabiting.
“As shown in Table 41, those who were lost at follow-up were younger, had smoked for a shorter period of time, were less likely to have a medical condition and were less likely to be white or cohabiting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAt 1 year, abstinence rates with self-quitters are approximately 3%, considerably lower than the 8% found here.
“At 1 year, abstinence rates with self-quitters are approximately 3%, 86 considerably lower than the 8% found here.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [86] Hughes, 2004, Shape of the relapse curve and long-term abstinence among untreated smokers, Addiction source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataRoutine data provide a useful and not inaccurate indicator of short-term smoking cessation outcomes.
“These results provided suggest that (a) routine data provide a useful and not inaccurate indicator of short-term smoking cessation outcomes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrevious research with 'self-quitters' not participating in a smoking treatment programme has estimated abstinence rates at 25% at 4 weeks, which is considerably lower than the overall 4-week quit rate (41%) and the lowest 95% CI boundary (36%).
“Previous research with 'self-quitters' not participating in a smoking treatment programme has estimated abstinence rates at 25% at 4 weeks, 42 which is considerably lower than the overall 4-week quit rate (41%) and the lowest 95% CI boundary (36%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] West, 2013, Performance of English stop smoking services in first 10 years: analysis of service monitoring data, BMJ source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNICE guidance previously recommended that services aim to reach at least 5% of their smoking population in a year.
“NICE guidance previously recommended that services aim to reach at least 5% of their smoking population in a year.21”
- Also stated in: § Chapter 11 Conclusions · plain
“NICE guidance previously recommended that services aim to reach at least 5% of their smoking population in a year.21”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Chapter 11 Conclusions · plain
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe ELONS study purposively selected nine services that offered different types of interventions in a range of settings, some of which reported quit rates higher than the national average while others reported lower rates.
“The ELONS study purposively selected nine services that offered different types of interventions in a range of settings, some of which reported quit rates higher than the national average while others reported lower rates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAt follow-up, those who provided a saliva sample were older and more likely to be cohabiting. Again, there were some treatment differences (they were less likely to have used a drop-in clinic but more likely to have used varenicline). Clients for whom a follow-up sample was available had lower baseline levels of dependence (likely reflecting the lower response rate among those who smoked at 4 неде
“At follow-up, those who provided a saliva sample were older and more likely to be cohabiting.Again, there were some treatment differences (they were less likely to have used a drop-in clinic but more likely to have used varenicline).Clients for whom a follow-up sample was available had lower baseline levels of dependence (likely reflecting the lower response rate among those who smoked at 4 weeks”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataEven among CO-validated non-smokers at follow-up who indicated that they did not use NRT, over one in five had cotinine values above the usual cut-off level, suggesting either a high rate of deception in this group or undeclared use of other nicotine-containing products.
“Yet, even among CO-validated non-smokers at follow-up who indicated that they did not use NRT, over one in five had cotinine values above the usual cut-off level, suggesting either a high rate of deception in this group or undeclared use of other nicotine-containing products.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThese services form an important part of a wider network of policies aimed to reduce smoking rates, including policies such as tobacco taxation, mass media campaigns, bans on advertising and Smokefree laws.
“These services form an important part of a wider network of policies aimed to reduce smoking rates, including policies such as tobacco taxation, mass media campaigns, bans on advertising and Smokefree laws.15”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Department of Health, 1998
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningOur earlier work was conducted with just two (albeit large) services that performed better than the national average based on comparisons with routine data.
“Our earlier work was conducted with just two (albeit large) services that performed better than the national average based on comparisons with routine data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSmokers in these previous studies have reported experiencing more negative moods shortly after quitting that may be related to relapse.
“Smokers in these previous studies have reported experiencing more negative moods shortly after quitting that may be related to relapse.98”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [98] Mendelsohn, 2012, Smoking and depression: a review, Aust Fam Physician
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThis suggests that the level of well-being at baseline is important as a predictor of who may quit smoking, and that this difference is maintained.
“This suggests that the level of well-being at baseline is important as a predictor of who may quit smoking, and that this difference is maintained.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The WHO-5 Well-being Index is a valid measure of well-being.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationTime and resource pressures in settings such as GP practices and pharmacies may also contribute to poorer outcomes for clients of non-specialists.
“Time and resource pressures in settings such as GP practices and pharmacies may also contribute to poorer outcomes for clients of non-specialists.94,95”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [94] Bhardwa, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [95] Tumilty D, Gilmore G. Improving Quality in Stop Smoking Services. UK National Smoking Cessation Conference, London, 12–13 June 2014.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLonger-term NRT use among smokers in the general population is rare.
“This is in agreement with similar figures from the general population suggesting that longer-term NRT use among smokers is rare.108”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [108] Silla, 2014, Characterization of long-term users of nicotine replacement therapy: evidence from a national survey, Nicotine Tob Res source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataClient characteristics cannot be easily modified, but service characteristics can, and our findings show that some interventions are more effective than others.
“Client characteristics cannot be easily modified, but service characteristics can, and our findings show that some interventions are more effective than others.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThese results reflect those of our previously published paper on the success of open groups.
“These results reflect those of our previously published paper 26 on the success of open groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Hiscock, 2013, Behavioural therapy for smoking cessation: the effectiveness of different intervention types for disadvantaged and affluent smokers, Addict Behav source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlthough SSSs are able to reach significant numbers of smokers living in disadvantaged areas, these smokers face additional barriers to quitting.
“Thus, although SSSs are able to reach significant numbers of smokers living in disadvantaged areas, 19 these smokers face additional barriers to quitting.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] Chesterman, 2005, How effective are the English smoking treatment services in reaching disadvantaged smokers?, Addiction source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNeurologically, this may be related to higher levels of cortisol and adrenocorticotrophic hormone as a response to stress.
“Neurologically, this may be related to higher levels of cortisol and adrenocorticotrophic hormone as a response to stress.103”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [103] McKee, 2011, Stress decreases the ability to resist smoking and potentiates smoking intensity and reward, J Psychopharmacol source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAlthough few other studies have looked at positive well-being, research has found that psychological distress and mental health conditions can reduce the chances of successfully stopping smoking.
“Although few other studies have looked at positive well-being, research has found that psychological distress and mental health conditions can reduce the chances of successfully stopping smoking.57,97,98”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [57] Seguire, 2000, Addressing the ‘costs of quitting’ smoking: a health promotion issue for adolescent girls in Canada, Health Promot Int source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [97] Leung, 2011, Psychological distress is associated with tobacco smoking and quitting behaviour in the Australian population: evidence from National Cross-Sectional Surveys, Aust N Z J Psychiatry source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [98] Mendelsohn, 2012, Smoking and depression: a review, Aust Fam Physician
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOther studies have found that stress is associated with higher levels of smoking.
“Other studies have found that stress is associated with higher levels of smoking.101,102”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [101] Ng, 2003, Relationships between perceived stress and health behaviors in a sample of working adults, Health Psychol source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [102] Todd, 2004, Daily processes in stress and smoking: effects of negative events, nicotine dependence, and gender, Psychol Addict Behav source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataDespite an encouraging response rate, clients who were motivated to complete the survey were also more likely to have had a successful quit attempt.
“Despite an encouraging response rate (response to self-completion postal surveys are generally low, even with repeated reminders) clients who were motivated to complete the survey were also more likely to have had a successful quit attempt.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDespite smokers stating that they smoke to cope with stress, higher levels of stress have been found among smokers, which then declines with smoking cessation.
“However, despite smokers stating that they smoke to cope with stress, higher levels of stress have been found among smokers, 104 which then declines with smoking cessation.105”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHaving financial difficulties, which could signify feelings of a lack of control, has been associated with fewer quit attempts and less success in the quit attempts that did take place.
“In addition, having financial difficulties, which could signify feelings of a lack of control, has been associated with fewer quit attempts and less success in the quit attempts that did take place.100”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [100] Caleyachetty, 2012, Struggling to make ends meet: exploring pathways to understand why smokers in financial difficulties are less likely to quit successfully, Eur J Public Health source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFeelings of control have not received much attention in the context of smoking cessation, although perceived control has been found to positively influence intention to quit smoking.
“Feelings of control have not received much attention in the context of smoking cessation, although perceived control has been found to positively influence intention to quit smoking.99”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [99] Curtis, 2012, Understanding tailored Internet smoking cessation messages: a reasoned action approach, Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThis was possibly mediated by being unable to cope with stress.
“This was possibly mediated by being unable to cope with stress.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The WHO-5 Well-being Index is a valid measure of well-being.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningIMD was included at PCT level, which is large geographically and may explain the lack of significant results.
“IMD was included at PCT level, which is large geographically and may explain the lack of significant results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenThe study design allowed clients to be their own control, thus further reducing confounding.
“Moreover, the study design allowed clients to be their own control, thus further reducing confounding.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningCIs of quit rates for many behavioural support types were wide and some non-significant differences may be a consequence of the study being underpowered.
“However, CIs of quit rates for many behavioural support types were wide and it may be that some non-significant differences are a consequence of the study being underpowered.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIn the analysis all ethnic minorities were compared with white people, and ethnicity was not disaggregated further because of small numbers.
“In the analysis all ethnic minorities were compared with white people.Ethnicity was not disaggregated further because of small numbers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningLong-term NRT use is not associated with increased health risks as assessed here, and is certainly safer than continued smoking.
“It builds on earlier research indicating that long-term NRT use is not associated with increased health risks as assessed here, and is certainly safer than continued smoking.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationClinical trials suggest that permanent replacement of cigarettes with NRT among ex-smokers can result in 40% of baseline levels of nicotine being substituted by nicotine-replacement products.
“Clinical trials suggest that permanent replacement of cigarettes with NRT among ex-smokers can result in 40% of baseline levels of nicotine being substituted by nicotine-replacement products.110,111”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [110] Tonnesen, 1999, Higher dosage nicotine patches increase one-year smoking cessation rates: results from the European CEASE trial. Collaborative European Anti-Smoking Evaluation. European Respiratory Society, Eur Respir J source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [111] Wennike, 2003, Smoking reduction promotes smoking cessation: results from a double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of nicotine gum with 2-year follow-up, Addiction source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAssessment was carried out with established, ecologically valid measures and smoking status verified.
“Assessment was carried out with established, ecologically valid measures and smoking status verified.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe secondary analysis includes only data from PCTs who agreed to their QuitManager data set being used for research purposes.
“The secondary analysis includes only data from PCTs who agreed to their QuitManager data set being used for research purposes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenNSSEC is complicated to classify and may not reflect SES for clients who are not the chief income earner of the household.
“NSSEC is complicated to classify and may not reflect SES for clients who are not the chief income earner of the household.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe self-reported quit rate for all English SSSs from April 2010 to March 2011 was 49%, and 70% were CO validated.
“Furthermore, the self-reported quit rate for all English SSSs from April 2010 to March 2011 was also 49%, and 70% were CO validated 43 compared with 74% in the secondary analysis sample suggesting that the sample were representative of the whole.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] NHS Information Centre, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationSmokers are very adept at titrating nicotine levels, with some nicotine otherwise obtained from cigarettes being replaced by nicotine from NRT.
“These findings reflect that smokers are very adept at titrating nicotine levels, with some nicotine otherwise obtained from cigarettes being replaced by nicotine from NRT. 113”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [113] Fagerstrom, 1997, Aiding reduction of smoking with nicotine replacement medications: hope for the recalcitrant smoker?, Tob Control source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningFor the well-being element, the analysis reported was largely exploratory and any conclusions can only be tentative.
“For the well-being element in particular, it is also the case that the analysis reported was largely exploratory and any conclusions can only be tentative.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationConcurrent NRT use among smokers, either for temporary abstinence or for cutting down, has remained relatively stable since 2002 and mostly reflects short-term use.
“Indeed, concurrent NRT use among smokers, either for temporary abstinence or for cutting down, has remained relatively stable since 2002 109 and mostly reflects short-term use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [109] West, 2005, Impact of UK policy initiatives on use of medicines to aid smoking cessation, Tob Control source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenDespite an initial large sample size, dropout across the main study was substantial, resulting in relatively few clients with complete baseline and follow-up data on biomarkers.
“Despite an initial large sample size, dropout across the main study was inevitably substantial, resulting in relatively few clients with complete baseline and follow-up data on biomarkers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenWeighting was used in the assessment of long-term NRT use prevalence, which should account for differential dropout.
“In addition, weighting was used in the assessment of long-term NRT use prevalence, which should account for differential dropout.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningTo overcome the low response rate, weighting and multivariable analysis were used.
“To overcome the low response rate we have used weighting and multivariable analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenEligibility for free prescriptions can be for medical or age reasons in addition to low income.
“Eligibility for free prescriptions can be for medical or age reasons in addition to low income.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenWe treated group clients as independent, whereas the chances of a group member quitting may depend to some extent on the other group members and the culture of the group.
“We treated group clients as independent, whereas the chances of a group member quitting may depend to some extent on the other group members and the culture of the group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe consistency of estimates between PCTs (majority between 5% and 12%) and consistency of quit rates calculated for unique clients and client records gives support to the technique used.
“However, the consistency of our estimates between PCTs (the majority between 5% and 12%) and the consistency of quit rates calculated for unique clients and client records gives support to the technique used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningLong-term NRT use is safe and not associated with increased health risks, certainly compared with continued smoking.
“Altogether, these findings suggest that long-term NRT use is safe and not associated with increased health risks, certainly compared with continued smoking.78”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [78] Sims, 2002, Pharmacotherapy for treating tobacco dependence: what is the ideal duration of therapy?, CNS Drugs source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe baseline sample differed from the sample followed up, but differences were relatively modest and unlikely to have substantially biased findings.
“In addition, the baseline sample differed from the sample followed up.However, differences were relatively modest and therefore unlikely to have substantially biased findings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAlthough clients self-selected into groups rather than being experimentally assigned, this reflects real-world use of NRT.
“Although clients self-selected into groups rather than being experimentally assigned, this reflects real-world use of NRT.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningAt follow-up, well-being questions were included in postal surveys sent to clients' home addresses, as was the satisfaction questionnaire; response rate was low and caution is required in interpreting results.
“At follow-up the well-being questions were included in postal surveys sent to clients' home addresses, as was the satisfaction questionnaire.As with most postal surveys, the response rate was low and caution is therefore required in interpreting the results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThere was no evidence of variance between practitioners at baseline, so single-level models were used for modelling well-being at baseline.
“There was no evidence of variance between practitioners at baseline, so single-level models were used for modelling well-being at baseline; however, practitioner was included a random effect at the second level for 4 weeks and 52 weeks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataFor 52-week quitting, there was no evidence of variance between practitioners consistently, so single-level modelling was used.
“For 52-week quitting, there was no evidence of variance between practitioners consistently, so single-level modelling was used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWell-being may be a predictor of successful smoking cessation.
“In addition, as well as being a desired outcome of a health interventions, well-being may also be a predictor of successful smoking cessation.[55][56][57][58][59]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [55][56][57][58][59]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataSkew of well-being at baseline was below ±0.8 and could be disregarded so parametric statistics could be used.
“Skew was below ± 0.8 and could be disregarded so parametric statistics could be used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataMulticollinearity was checked.
“Non-significant optional variables were removed and multicollinearity was checked.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The 1-year abstinence rate observed in the ELONS prospective cohort is representative of all NHS Stop Smoking Services clients in England.
“If these results are applied to all of England, then we estimate that in the year 2012-13 the services supported 36,249 clients to become non-smokers for the remainder of their lives.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Clients who are abstinent at 1 year will remain non-smokers for the remainder of their lives.
“If these results are applied to all of England, then we estimate that in the year 2012-13 the services supported 36,249 clients to become non-smokers for the remainder of their lives.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The 49 services providing routine data are representative of all 150 NHS Stop Smoking Services in England.
“Our secondary analysis of routine data from 49 of 150 services in England found 4-week quit rates of 48% when self-reported data were included, falling to 34% when biochemical validation had occurred.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The nine prospective study services are representative of all NHS Stop Smoking Services in England.
“From our prospective study of just over 3000 smokers attending SSSs in nine areas of England, we found that just over 4 in 10 (41.2%) were biochemically validated as abstinent from smoking at 4 weeks post quit date.”
The paper relies on this without support.
No routine data exist for longer-term cessation outcomes at 1 year.
“No routine data exist for longer-term cessation outcomes at 1 year and it is some time since a study in England has looked at this issue.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is some time since a study in England has looked at longer-term cessation outcomes.
“No routine data exist for longer-term cessation outcomes at 1 year and it is some time since a study in England has looked at this issue.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Stop Smoking Services in England are not required to routinely collect data on longer-term cessation outcomes.
“Stop Smoking Services in England are not required to routinely collect data on longer-term cessation outcomes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Only outcomes 4 weeks after a client's quit date are collected and reported by SSSs.
“Only outcomes 4 weeks after a client's quit date are collected and reported.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The routine data collected by SSSs are limited in scope, and the quality and quantity of data collected varies between service providers.
“Furthermore, the routine data collected by SSSs are limited in scope, and the quality and quantity of data collected varies between service providers.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The decline in quit dates set in SSSs in England after recruitment was completed is attributed to more smokers using electronic cigarettes for cutting down or quitting rather than more established methods.
“The decline continued after recruitment was completed, and much or at least some of this has been attributed to more smokers using electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) for cutting down or quitting rather than more established methods.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Participants who were lost to follow-up were assumed to be smoking, consistent with an intention-to-treat analysis.
“Participants who were lost to follow-up (22.6% at 4 weeks and 45.2% at 52 weeks) were assumed to be smoking, consistent with an intention-to-treat analysis.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Well-being is affected by outside, and therefore modifiable, sources rather than fixed personality traits.
“The components, measuring protection, control, prestige and response to change, are theoretically related to ontological security but also implicitly assume that well-being is affected by outside, and therefore modifiable, sources rather than fixed personality traits.”
The paper relies on this without support.
An important determinant of successful quit attempts is the extent to which service clients continue to attend sessions and also use stop smoking medication.
“It is likely that an important determinant of successful quit attempts is the extent to which service clients continue to attend sessions and also use stop smoking medication.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is little research on long-term NRT use.
“There is little research in this topic,”
The paper relies on this without support.
Routine data collected by the services report on only short-term outcomes and are limited in detail.
“As routine data collected by the services report on only short-term outcomes and are limited in detail,”
The paper relies on this without support.
The configuration of services has changed in the last decade and there is a greater reliance on community practitioners with lower short-term quit rates delivering support rather than specialist smoking cessation staff.
“In addition, the configuration of services has changed in the last decade and there is clearly a greater reliance on community practitioners (such as pharmacists and practice nurses) with lower short-term quit rates delivering support rather than specialist smoking cessation staff.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The WHO-5 Well-being Index is a valid measure of well-being.
“The WHO-5 Well-being Index was integrated successfully into routine questions asked of service clients at baseline.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The ontological security items measure ontological security.
“only the ontological security items [I enjoy a challenge, I can do what I want when I want, I feel in control, I feel safe, I worry about things going wrong (reversed), I feel I'm doing well in life, My life has a sense of routine] and being abstinent from smoking at 52 weeks were associated with well-being”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cotinine is a biomarker of nicotine exposure.
“cotinine, the primary metabolite of nicotine as a biomarker of exposure”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Smoking declined uniformly by 4% in all PCTs between 2003 and 2005, and also in 2009.
“We also assumed that smoking declined uniformly by 4% in all PCTs between 2003 and 2005, and also in 2009, when it is likely that the smoking rate declined more in PCTs with an affluent population and less in PCTs with a more disadvantaged population.118”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Each client in the database was unique (for all but the impact analysis) when estimating that 8% of clients used the SSS more than once during the year.
“For all but the impact analysis we assumed that each client in the database was unique when we estimated that 8% of clients used the SSS more than once during the year.”
The paper relies on this without support.
No routine data exist on longer-term cessation at 1 year and it is some time since a study in England has looked at this issue.
“No routine data exist on longer-term cessation at 1 year and it is some time since a study in England has looked at this issue.”
The paper relies on this without support.
No studies that we could identify had examined changes in well-being among clients of NHS SSSs.
“No studies that we could identify had examined changes in well-being among clients of NHS SSSs and thus we decided to include a focus on this in the current study.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is an association between many medical conditions and smoking.
“Second, we wished to consider medical conditions because there is an association between many medical conditions and smoking.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Clients with higher well-being are more likely to be able to successfully quit smoking long term.
“This may be helpful because clients with higher well-being are more likely to be able to successfully quit smoking long term.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Collecting data on well-being is not something normally done by stop smoking services.
“A novel aspect of the ELONS study was that data on well-being was also collected from participants, not something normally done by the services.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The clinic's 1-year abstinence rate (38%) is higher than that of UK stop smoking services (~8%) and the Mayo clinic (28% at 6 months).
“These are very high success rates compared for example with around 8% achieved in UK stop smoking services [25] (which also deliver a combination of behavioural support and pharmacotherapy, albeit usually restricted to a shorter period of time ) and compared with the Mayo clinic which uses a similar treatment model and reported 28% self-reported abstinence at 6 months [26].”
From Depression and smoking cessation: evidence from a smoking cessation clinic with 1-year follow-up (2017) · cites this paper as [25]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Table 3's overall self-report count conflicts with its rate
MinorThe stated 89,085 self-reported quitters are 48.8% of 182,603 cases, not the 44.1% shown in the same row.
Reported 44.1 · recomputed 48.786165
“| Total: intention-to-treat | 182,603 | 100.0 | 44.1 | 30.7 | 89,085 | 73.9 |”
Table 46 reverses the 52-week quit and non-quit counts
MinorTable 46 labels 351 postal-survey respondents as quitters and 128 as non-quitters. Table 45 labels the same counts the other way round.
“| Quit at 52 weeks | 282 | N/A | 178 | N/A | 351 | - | | Not quit at 52 weeks | 2677 | - | 775 | - | 128 | 11.76 |”
“| Not quit | - | - | 2772 | 90.7 | 775 | 81.3 | 351 | 73.3 | | Quit | - | - | 285 | 9.3 | 178 | 18.7 | 128 | 26.7 |”
Table 3 source note excludes months displayed in the table
MinorThe source note says the table covers episodes from January through June 2011, but the table includes rows for July through November 2010.
“Source: QuitManager (completed treatment episodes between 1 January 2011 and 30 June 2011, excluding quit dates set”
“| July 2010 | 15,244 | 8.6 | 46.4 | 31.4 | 7066 | 72.9 |”
Table 3's white-client self-report count is incompatible with its rate
MinorThe row gives 5,237 self-reported quitters among 158,377 white clients, which is 3.3%, rather than the stated 49.3%. The adjacent ethnic-minority row also lists 78,149 self-reported quitters despite having only 12,165 clients, suggesting the counts were interchanged.
Reported 49.3 · recomputed 3.306667
“| White | 158,377 | 89.3 | 49.3 | 34.6 | 5237 | 74.0 |”
Table 23 overstates the share with two medication recordings
MinorThe 616 participants in this row are 20.2% of the stated sample of 3,057, not 22.0%.
Reported 22 · recomputed 20.150474
“| 2 occasions | 616 | 22.0 | 30.1 (22.0 to 39.6) | 7.3 (5.2 to 10.2) |”
Table 16 gives the wrong percentage for missing single-NRT-use data
MinorFifteen missing cases out of 3,069 constitute about 0.5%, not the reported 32.7%.
Reported 32.7 · recomputed 0.488759
“| Missing | 15 | 32.7 | - | - |”
Two different totals are given for the QuitManager database
MinorThe methods report 202,804 client records, whereas the summary calls the database 202,084 records.
“In total there were 202,804 client records included in the database.”
“compared with the 202,084 client records in the QuitManager database used here.”
Glasgow four-week self-report percentage uses the wrong denominator
MinorTable 27 states a Glasgow sample of 1,785 and 552 self-reported quitters. That is 30.9% of the sample, not 70.3%.
Reported 70.3 · recomputed 30.92437
“| Total 4-week self-report (excluding refuted by | 1268 (61.3) | 552 (70.3) | 1729 (56.5) |”
Cites
Projections of Global Mortality and Burden of Disease from 2002 to 2030
Mathers, C. D., & Loncar, D. (2006) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030442 · Cited by 11,386 · see citing works
Smoking and Carcinoma of the Lung
Doll, R., & Hill, A. B. (1950) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.2.4682.739 · Cited by 1,999 · see citing works
Öberg, M., Jaakkola, M. S., Woodward, A., Peruga, A., & Prüss-Ustün, A. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61388-8 · Cited by 1,911 · see citing works
Socioeconomic status and smoking: a review
Hiscock, R., Bauld, L., Amos, A., Fidler, J. A., & Munafò, M. (2012) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06202.x · Cited by 1,572 · see citing works
Self-citationShape of the relapse curve and long-term abstinence among untreated smokers
Hughes, J. R., Keely, J., & Naud, S. (2004) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00540.x · Cited by 1,414 · see citing works
Change in mental health after smoking cessation: systematic review and meta-analysis
Taylor, G., McNeill, A., Girling, A., Farley, A., Lindson-Hawley, N., & Aveyard, P. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g1151 · Cited by 1,039 · see citing works
Self-citationIndividual behavioural counselling for smoking cessation
Lancaster, T., & Stead, L. F. (2005) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001292.pub2 · Cited by 1,015 · see citing works
Relationships between perceived stress and health behaviors in a sample of working adults
Ng, D. M., & Jeffery, R. W. (2003) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.22.6.638 · Cited by 663 · see citing works
Determinants of salivary α-amylase in humans and methodological considerations
Rohleder, N., & Nater, U. M. (2009) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.12.004 · Cited by 604 · see citing works
Predictors of smoking cessation in a cohort of adult smokers followed for five years
Hymowitz, N., Cummings, K., Hyland, A., Lynn, W., Pechacek, T., & Hartwell, T. (1997) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tc.6.suppl_2.s57 · Cited by 593 · see citing works
Interindividual variability in the metabolism and cardiovascular effects of nicotine in man.
Benowitz, N. L., Jacob, P., Jones, R. T., & Rosenberg, J. B. (1982) · Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3565(25)33068-5 · Cited by 454 · see citing works
Institute of Medicine (2001) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/10029 · Cited by 448 · see citing works
Does cigarette smoking cause stress?
Parrott, A. C. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.10.817 · Cited by 447 · see citing works
Raw, M., McNeill, A. D., & West, R. (1998) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thx.53.2008.s1 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
Benowitz, N. L., & Gourlay, S. G. (1997) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00079-x · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Group behaviour therapy programmes for smoking cessation
Stead, L. F., & Lancaster, T. (2005) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001007.pub2 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
Does cigarette smoking cause stress?
Parrott, A. C. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.54.10.817 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Moore, D., Aveyard, P., Connock, M., Wang, D., Fry-Smith, A., & Barton, P. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b1024 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Self-citationThe English smoking treatment services: one‐year outcomes
Ferguson, J., Bauld, L., Chesterman, J., & Judge, K. (2005) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01028.x · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Self-citationGroup behaviour therapy programmes for smoking cessation.
Stead, L., Carroll, A. J., & Lancaster, T. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001007.pub3 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Stress decreases the ability to resist smoking and potentiates smoking intensity and reward
McKee, S. A., Sinha, R., Weinberger, A. H., Sofuoglu, M., Harrison, E. L., Lavery, M., & Wanzer, J. (2011) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/0269881110376694 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
'Beyond Four Walls'. The Psycho-social Benefits of Home: Evidence from West Central Scotland
Kearns, A., Hiscock, R., Ellaway, A., & MacIntyre, S. (2000) · Housing Studies · doi:10.1080/02673030050009249 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Self-citationImplications of CYP2A6 Genetic Variation for Smoking Behaviors and Nicotine Dependence*
Malaiyandi, V., Sellers, E. M., & Tyndale, R. F. (2005) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.clpt.2004.10.011 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Tonnesen (1999) · doi:10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.13b04.x · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Brown, J., West, R., Beard, E., Michie, S., Shahab, L., & McNeill, A. (2014) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.03.009 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Self-citationCommon predictors of smoking cessation in clinical practice
Caponnetto, P., & Polosa, R. (2008) · Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2008.02.017 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions among adults: a systematic review of reviews
Lemmens, V., Oenema, A., Knut, I. K., & Brug, J. (2008) · European Journal of Cancer Prevention · doi:10.1097/cej.0b013e3282f75e48 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Osler, M., & Prescott, E. (1998) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tc.7.3.262 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Behavioural interventions for smoking cessation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Mottillo, S., Filion, K. B., Bélisle, P., Joseph, L., Gervais, A., O'Loughlin, J., Paradis, G., Pihl, R., Pilote, L., Rinfret, S., et al. (2009) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn552 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Hiscock, R., Judge, K., & Bauld, L. (2011) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdq097 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Self-citationEvaluating Group-Based Interventions When Control Participants Are Ungrouped
Bauer, D. J., Sterba, S. K., & Hallfors, D. D. (2008) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273170802034810 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Wennike, P., Danielsson, T., Landfeldt, B., Westin, Å., & Tønnesen, P. (2003) · Addiction · doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00489.x · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Jarvis, M. J., Wardle, J., Waller, J., & Owen, L. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7398.1061 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Bauld, L., Judge, K., & Platt, S. (2007) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tc.2007.021626 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Self-citationPiper, M. E., Kenford, S. L., Fiore, M. C., & Baker, T. B. (2011) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-011-9329-2 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Long-term use of nicotine gum is associated with hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance
Eliasson, B., Taskinen, M.-R., & Smith, U. (1996) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.94.5.878 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Wang, D., Connock, M., Barton, P., Fry-Smith, A., Aveyard, P., & Moore, D. (2008) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta12020 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Self-citationAiding reduction of smoking with nicotine replacement medications: hope for the recalcitrant smoker?
Fagerstrom, K. O., Tejding, R., Westin, A., & Lunell, E. (1997) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tc.6.4.311 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Effectiveness of Extended-Duration Transdermal Nicotine Therapy: A Randomized Trial
Schnoll, R. A., Patterson, F., Wileyto, E. P., Heitjan, D. F., Shields, A. E., Asch, D. A., & Lerman, C. (2010) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-152-3-201002020-00005 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
The English smoking treatment services: short-term outcomes
Judge, K., Bauld, L., Chesterman, J., & Ferguson, J. (2005) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01027.x · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Self-citationLawrence, D., Mitrou, F., & Zubrick, S. R. (2011) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-256 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Daily processes in stress and smoking: effects of negative events, nicotine dependence, and gender
Todd, M. (2004) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/0893-164x.18.1.31 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
What makes for an effective stop-smoking service?
Brose, L. S., West, R., McDermott, M. S., Fidler, J. A., Croghan, E., & McEwen, A. (2011) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200251 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Self-citationPerformance of English stop smoking services in first 10 years: analysis of service monitoring data
West, R., May, S., West, M., Croghan, E., & McEwen, A. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.f4921 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Self-citationThe effect of stopping smoking on perceived stress levels
Hajek, P., Taylor, T., & McRobbie, H. (2010) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02979.x · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Self-citationShiffman, S. S., Sweeney, C. T., Ferguson, S. G., Sembower, M. A., & Gitchell, J. G. (2008) · Clinical Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.09.016 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Does nicotine replacement therapy cause cancer? Evidence from the Lung Health Study
Murray, R. P., Connett, J. E., & Zapawa, L. M. (2009) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntp104 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Smoking and depression--a review.
Mendelsohn, C. P. (2012) · PubMed · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Chronic Disease Management for Tobacco Dependence: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Joseph, A. M. (2011) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.500 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Impact of UK policy initiatives on use of medicines to aid smoking cessation
West, R., DiMarino, M. E., Gitchell, J., & McNeill, A. (2005) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tc.2004.008649 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control
DeVita, V. T. (2005) · Nature Clinical Practice Oncology · doi:10.1038/ncponc0133 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
The influence of school culture on smoking among pupils
Aveyard, P., Markham, W. A., Lancashire, E., Bullock, A., Macarthur, C., Cheng, K. K., & Daniels, H. (2004) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00396-4 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Self-citationA national strategy for smoking cessation treatment in England
McNeill, A. D., Raw, M., Whybrow, J., & Bailey, P. (2005) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01022.x · Cited by 82 · see citing works
National Statistics Socioeconomic Classification (NS-SEC)
(2017) · Bristol University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctt1t892cc.47 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
RE-AIMing Research for Application: Ways to Improve Evidence for Family Medicine
Glasgow, R. E. (2006) · The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine · doi:10.3122/jabfm.19.1.11 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
The use of salivary biomarkers in occupational and environmental medicine
Koh, D., & Koh, G. (2007) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oem.2006.026567 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Use of more nicotine lozenges leads to better success in quitting smoking
Shiffman, S. S. (2007) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01791.x · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Hiscock, R., MacIntyre, S., Kearns, A., & Ellaway, A. (2003) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00076 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citationHiscock, R., Murray, S., Brose, L. S., McEwen, A., Bee, J. L., Dobbie, F., & Bauld, L. (2013) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.07.010 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citationMcEwen, A., West, R., & McRobbie, H. (2006) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.12.014 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citationLe Strat, Y., Rehm, J., & Le Foll, B. (2011) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tc.2010.038703 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Shiffman, S., & Sweeney, C. T. (2008) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.08.006 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Ferguson, J., Docherty, G., Bauld, L., Lewis, S., Lorgelly, P. K., Boyd, K., McEwen, A., & Coleman, T. J. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e1696 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationStapleton, J. A., & West, R. (2012) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntr236 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
How effective are the English smoking treatment services in reaching disadvantaged smokers?
Chesterman, J., Judge, K., Bauld, L., & Ferguson, J. (2005) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01026.x · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationBeard, E., McNeill, A., Aveyard, P., Fidler, J., Michie, S., & West, R. (2013) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050007 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationTobacco, nicotine and harm reduction
Houezec, J. L., McNeill, A. D., & Britton, J. R. (2011) · Drug and Alcohol Review · doi:10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00264.x · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Does smoking cessation improve health-related quality-of-life?
Stewart, A. L., King, A. C., Killen, J. D., & Ritter, P. L. (1995) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf02888598 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Hajek, P., McRobbie, H., & Gillison, F. (2007) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.10.005 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Self-citationLeung, J., Gartner, C., Dobson, A., Lucke, J., & Hall, W. (2011) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.3109/00048674.2010.534070 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Caleyachetty, A., Lewis, S., McNeill, A., & Leonardi-Bee, J. (2012) · The European Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckr199 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Tobacco Atlas, Fourth Edition
Wipfli, H. L. (2012) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kws389 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Housing renewal and mental health: A case study
Blackman, J. H. T. (2001) · Journal of Mental Health · doi:10.1080/09638230120041335 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Changes in health-related quality of life with smoking cessation treatment
Hays, J. T., Croghan, I. T., Baker, C. L., Cappelleri, J. C., & Bushmakin, A. G. (2010) · European Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckq137 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Kearns, A., Whitley, E., Mason, P., Petticrew, M. P., & Hoy, C. (2011) · International Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1007/s00038-011-0275-3 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Pharmacotherapy for Treating Tobacco Dependence: What is the Ideal Duration of Therapy?
Sims, T. H., & Fiore, M. C. (2002) · CNS Drugs · doi:10.2165/00023210-200216100-00001 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Brose, L. S., McEwen, A., & West, R. (2012) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03935.x · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationCharacteristics and prevalence of hardcore smokers attending UK general practitioners
MacIntosh, H., & Coleman, T. (2006) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/1471-2296-7-24 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationFucito, L. M., Bars, M. P., Forray, A., Rojewski, A. M., Shiffman, S., Selby, P., West, R., Foulds, J., Toll, B. A., & Writing Committee for the SRNT Policy and Treatment Networks (2014) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntu087 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
McDermott, M. S., Beard, E., Brose, L. S., West, R., & McEwen, A. (2013) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/nts262 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationBlack, A. B., Beard, E., Brown, J., Fidler, J., & West, R. (2012) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03955.x · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Fielding, A. (2004) · Quality and Quantity · doi:10.1023/b:ququ.0000043118.19835.6c · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Evaluation of a drop‐in rolling‐group model of support to stop smoking
Bauld, L., Ferguson, J., McEwen, A., & Hiscock, R. (2012) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03861.x · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationvan der Deen, F. S., Carter, K. N., Wilson, N., & Collings, S. C. (2011) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-598 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Analysis of rolling group therapy data using conditionally autoregressive priors
Paddock, S. M., Hunter, S. B., Watkins, K. E., & McCaffrey, D. F. (2011) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/10-aoas434 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Analysis of rolling group therapy data using conditionally autoregressive priorsPreprint
Paddock, S. M., Hunter, S. B., Watkins, K. E., McCaffrey, D. F., & Rand Corporation (2011) · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Shahab, L., Cummings, K. M., Hammond, D., Borland, R., West, R., & McNeill, A. (2009) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02641.x · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationBeard, E., Fidler, J., & West, R. (2011) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-011-2359-4 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Beard, E., McDermott, M. S., McEwen, A., & West, R. (2011) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntr260 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationAddressing the ‘costs of quitting’ smoking: a health promotion issue for adolescent girls in Canada
Seguire, M. (2000) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/15.3.227 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Variation in saliva cotinine as a function of self-reported attempts to reduce cigarette consumption
Fidler, J. A., Stapleton, J. A., & West, R. (2011) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-011-2317-1 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Understanding Tailored Internet Smoking Cessation Messages: A Reasoned Action Approach
Curtis, B. (2012) · The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/0002716211423642 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Characterization of long-term users of nicotine replacement therapy: evidence from a national survey
Silla, K., Beard, E., & Shahab, L. (2014) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntu019 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationEstimating statistical power for open-enrollment group treatment trials
Morgan‐López, A. A., Saavedra, L. M., Hien, D. A., & Fals-Stewart, W. S. (2010) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2010.07.010 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
May, S., McEwen, A., Arnoldi, H., Bauld, L., Ferguson, J., & Stead, M. (2009) · Journal of Smoking Cessation · doi:10.1375/jsc.4.1.52 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationAbuse and smoking cessation in clinical practice
Smith, P. M., Spadoni, M., & Proper, V. M. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04219.x · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Bovornkitti, S. (2019) · Trends in Telemedicine & E-health · doi:10.31031/tteh.2019.01.000522 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- Office for National Statistics, 2014, Integrated Household Survey: January to December 2013, Smoking Prevalence
- World Health Organization, 2013, WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic: Enforcing Bans on Tobacco Advertising, Promotion, and Sponsorship
- Royal College of Physicians, 1962, Smoking and Health
- Royal College of Physicians of London, 1971, Smoking and Health Now: A New Report and Summary on Smoking and its Effects on Health, from the Royal College of Physicians of London
- Royal College of Physicians of London, 1977, Smoking or Health: The Third Report from the Royal College of Physicians of London
- Royal College of Physicians of London, 1983, Health or Smoking? Follow-up Report from the Royal College of Physicians of London
- Amos, 2009, A Review of Your People Smoking in England
- Department of Health, 1998, Smoking Kills: A White Paper on Tobacco
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), 2008, Smoking Cessation Services, NICE Public Health Guidance 10
- National Centre for Smoking Cessation and Training (NCSCT), 2014, Local Stop Smoking Services: Service and Delivery Guidance 2014
- Bauld, 2009, Comparing Models of Smoking Treatment in Glasgow: Final Report
- West, Assessing Smoking Cessation Performance in NHS Stop Smoking Services: The Russell Standard (Clinical). Version 2
- Health and Social Care Information Centre, 2013, Statistics on NHS Stop Smoking Services, England – April 2012 to March 2013
- North 51, 2010, QuitManager: The Stop Smoking Database
- Department of Health (DH), 2011, NHS Stop Smoking Services – Service and Monitoring Guidance 2011/12
- NHS Information Centre, 2008, Model Based Estimates of Smoking (Adults)
- Department of Communities and Local Government, 2010, English Indices of Deprivation – Consultation
- Rasbash, 2009, A User’s Guide to MLwiN, v2.10
- Office for National Statistics, 2011, Mid-2010 Population Estimates for Primary Care Organisations in England by Broad Age and Sex
- Office for National Statistics, 2011, Smoking and Drinking Among Adults, 2009: A Report on the 2009 General Lifestyle Survey
- NHS Information Centre, 2011, Statistics on NHS Stop Smoking Services: England, April 2010 – March 2011
- Psychiactric Research Unit at the Medical Health Centre North Zealand, 2013, WHO-Five Well-being Index (WHO-5)
- Salmond, 2006, Fitting Complex Models using Health Survey Data 2006
- Higher Education Careers Services Unit, 2013, What Proportion of the Population has a Degree-Level Qualification?
- Lister, 2010, Value for Money of Health Trainer Services: Final Report
- Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, 2010, MHRA Public Assessment Report: The Use of Nicotine Replacement Therapy to Reduce Harm in Smokers
- Health and Social Care Information Centre, 2014, NHS Stop Smoking Services Annual Return 2013–2014
- Bhardwa, 2014, Primary Care Funding Slipping 2014
- Tumilty D, Gilmore G. Improving Quality in Stop Smoking Services. UK National Smoking Cessation Conference, London, 12–13 June 2014.
- Department of Health, 2012, Stop Smoking Service: Monitoring and Guidance Update
- Amos, 2011, Tobacco Control, Inequalities in Health and Action at a Local Level
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Davenport, M. H., Ruchat, S.-M., Poitras, V. J., Jaramillo Garcia, A., Gray, C. E., Barrowman, N., Skow, R. J., Meah, V. L., Riske, L., Sobierajski, F., et al. (2018) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2018-099355 · Cited by 579 · see citing works
Davenport, M. H., Meah, V. L., Ruchat, S.-M., Davies, G., Skow, R. J., Barrowman, N., Adamo, K. B., Poitras, V. J., Gray, C. E., Garcia, A. J., et al. (2018) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2018-099836 · Cited by 444 · see citing works
Behavioural interventions for smoking cessation: an overview and network meta-analysis
Hartmann-Boyce, J., Livingstone-Banks, J., Ordóñez-Mena, J. M., Fanshawe, T. R., Lindson, N., Freeman, S. C., Sutton, A. J., Theodoulou, A., & Aveyard, P. (2021) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd013229.pub2 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Self-citationChung-Hall, J., Craig, L., Gravely, S., Sansone, N., & Fong, G. T. (2019) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054389 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Ruchat, S.-M., Mottola, M. F., Skow, R. J., Nagpal, T. S., Meah, V. L., James, M. A., Riske, L. A., Sobierajski, F. M., Kathol, A. J., Marchand, A.-A., et al. (2018) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2018-099399 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Hiscock, R., Dobbie, F., & Bauld, L. (2015) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2015/274056 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Self-citationKock, L. S., Brown, J., Hiscock, R., Tattan‐Birch, H., Smith, C. A., & Shahab, L. (2019) · The Lancet Public Health · doi:10.1016/s2468-2667(19)30220-8 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Self-citationPsoriasis and smoking: links and risks
Naldi, L. (2016) · Psoriasis Targets and Therapy · doi:10.2147/ptt.s85189 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Bauld, L., Graham, H. M., Sinclair, L., Flemming, K., Naughton, F., Ford, A., McKell, J., McCaughan, D., Hopewell, S., Angus, K., et al. (2017) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta21360 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Self-citationNaughton, F., Cooper, S. E., Foster, K. A., Emery, J. L., Leonardi‐Bee, J., Sutton, S. R., Jones, M., USSHER, M. H., Whitemore, R., Leighton, M., et al. (2017) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.13802 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Self-citationDepression and smoking cessation: evidence from a smoking cessation clinic with 1-year follow-up
Stepankova, L., Kralikova, E., Zvolska, K., Pankova, A., Ovesna, P., Blaha, M., & Brose, L. S. (2017) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-016-9869-6 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Fulton, E. A., Brown, K., Kwah, K., & Wild, S. (2016) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare4020031 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Jackson, S. E., McGowan, J., Ubhi, H. K., Proudfoot, H., Shahab, L., Brown, J., & West, R. (2019) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.14549 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Self-citationDavenport, M. H., Yoo, C., Mottola, M. F., Poitras, V. J., Garcia, A. J., Gray, C. E., Barrowman, N., Davies, G., Kathol, A. J., Skow, R. J., et al. (2018) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2018-099653 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Gucht, D. V., & Baeyens, F. (2016) · Harm Reduction Journal · doi:10.1186/s12954-016-0111-4 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
English Stop-Smoking Services: One-Year Outcomes
Bauld, L., Hiscock, R., Dobbie, F., Aveyard, P. N., Coleman, T. J., Leonardi‐Bee, J., McRobbie, H. J., & McEwen, A. (2016) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph13121175 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationRasmussen, M., Fernández, E., & Tønnesen, H. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013553 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Tobacco Cessation in Oncology Care
Kaiser, E. G., Prochaska, J. J., & Kendra, M. S. (2018) · Oncology · doi:10.1159/000489266 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
van Netten, J. J., Baba, M., & Lazzarini, P. A. (2017) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0488-5 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Williams, J. M., Steinberg, M. L., Kenefake, A., & Burke, M. V. (2016) · Journal of Addiction Medicine · doi:10.1097/adm.0000000000000239 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Epps, J., & Smart, N. A. (2016) · Cardiovascular Diabetology · doi:10.1186/s12933-016-0444-z · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Behavioural interventions for smoking cessation: an overview and network meta-analysis
Hartmann‐Boyce, J., Fanshawe, T. R., Lindson, N., Livingstone‐Banks, J., Ordóñez-Mena, J. M., & Aveyard, P. N. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd013229 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationShahab, L., Dobbie, F., Hiscock, R., McNeill, A. D., & Bauld, L. (2016) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntw258 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationShahab, L., Bauld, L., McNeill, A. D., & Tyndale, R. F. (2018) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.14450 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationLiu, M., Huang, Y., Hiscock, R., Li, Q., Bi, J., Kinney, P. L., & Sabel, C. E. (2016) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph13030344 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationThompson, T., Greaves, C. J., Ayres, R., Aveyard, P. N., Warren, F. C., Byng, R., Taylor, R. S., Campbell, J., USSHER, M. H., Michie, S., et al. (2016) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1641-5 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationCardiovascular risks in smokers treated with nicotine replacement therapy: a historical cohort study
Dollerup, J., Vestbo, J., Murray‐Thomas, T., Kaplan, A. G., Martin, R. J., Pizzichini, E., Pizzichini, M. M. M., Burden, A., Martin, J., & Price, D. B. (2017) · Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.2147/clep.s127775 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Mughal, F., Rashid, A., & Jawad, M. (2018) · Primary Health Care Research & Development · doi:10.1017/s1463423618000166 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
City scale climate change policies: Do they matter for wellbeing?
Hiscock, R., Asikainen, A. H., Tuomisto, J. T., Jantunen, M. J., Pärjälä, E., & Sabel, C. E. (2017) · Preventive Medicine Reports · doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.03.019 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationKotsen, C., Santorelli, M. L., Bloom, E. L., Goldstein, A. O., Ripley‐Moffitt, C., Steinberg, M. B., Burke, M. V., & Foulds, J. (2018) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/nty162 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Developing E-cigarette friendly smoking cessation services in England: staff perspectives
Farrimond, H. R., & Abraham, C. (2018) · Harm Reduction Journal · doi:10.1186/s12954-018-0244-8 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
A National Survey of Community Pharmacists on Smoking Cessation Services in Thailand
Chinwong, S., & Chinwong, D. (2018) · Pharmacy · doi:10.3390/pharmacy6030101 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Kuipers, M. A. G., West, R., Beard, E., & Brown, J. (2019) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntz108 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Views from the Coalface: What Do English Stop Smoking Service Personnel Think about E-Cigarettes?
Hiscock, R., Bauld, L., Arnott, D., Dockrell, M. J., Ross, L., & McEwen, A. (2015) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph121215048 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationShahab, L., Mortimer, E., Bauld, L., McGowan, J., McNeill, A. D., & Tyndale, R. F. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-17994-8 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationLove-Koh, J., Pennington, B., Owen, L., Taylor, M. J., & Griffin, S. C. (2020) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113339 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Novel Approaches to Value Assessment Within the Cost-Effectiveness Framework
Garrison, L. P., Jansen, J. P., Devlin, N. J., & Griffin, S. C. (2019) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2019.04.1915 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Iyahen, E. O., Omoruyi, O. O., Rowa‐Dewar, N., & Dobbie, F. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0288409 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationSong, F., Elwell-Sutton, T., & Naughton, F. (2019) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054879 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Ainscough, T., Brose, L. S., Strang, J., & McNeill, A. D. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017467 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Impact of Socioeconomic Differences on Distributional Cost-effectiveness Analysis
Yang, F. B., Angus, C., Duarte, A., Gillespie, D., Walker, S., & Griffin, S. C. (2020) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x20935883 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Bergeria, C. L., Heil, S. H., Bunn, J. Y., Sigmon, S. C., & Higgins, S. T. (2017) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntx148 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Wu, Q., Gilbert, H. M., Nazareth, I., Sutton, S. R., Morris, R. W., Petersen, I., Galton, S., & Parrott, S. (2017) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.14086 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Relph, S. A., Delaney, L., Melaugh, A., Vieira, M. C., Sandall, J., Khalil, A. A., Pasupathy, D., & Healey, A. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040022 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
French smoking cessation services provide effective support even to the more dependent
Baha, M., Boussadi, A., & Faou, A.-L. L. (2016) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.06.024 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Morphett, K., Holland, A., Ward, S., Steadman, K. J., Zwar, N. A., & GARTNER, C. E. (2024) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104353 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Engagement With Stop Smoking Services After Referral or Signposting: A Mixed-Methods Study
Pope, I., Rashid, S., Iqbal, H., Belderson, P., Ward, E., Clark, L., Conway, T., Stirling, S., Clark, A., Agrawal, S., et al. (2024) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntae159 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationA ‘Cut-Down-To-Stop’ intervention for smokers who find it hard to quit: a qualitative evaluation
Robinson, J. E., McEwen, A., Heah, R., & Papadakis, S. (2019) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-019-6738-9 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationSchoen, D. E., Glance, D., & Thompson, S. (2015) · Journal of Foot and Ankle Research · doi:10.1186/s13047-015-0128-z · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Kim, S., Shiffman, S. S., & Goldenson, N. I. (2024) · Substance Use & Misuse · doi:10.1080/10826084.2024.2303990 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Fulton, E. A., Newby, K. V., Gokal, K., Kwah, K., Schumacher, L. T., Jackson, L. J., Naughton, F., Coleman, T. J., & Brown, K. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028721 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationUncertainty Analysis in Intervention Impact on Health Inequality for Resource Allocation Decisions
Yang, F. B., Duarte, A., Walker, S., & Griffin, S. C. (2021) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x211009883 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Development of a Diabetic Foot Ulceration Prediction Model and Nomogram
Lee, E. J., Jeong, I. S., Woo, S. H., Jung, H. J., Han, E. J., Kang, C., & Hyun, S. (2021) · Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing · doi:10.4040/jkan.20257 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
McDonnell, B. P., Dicker, P., Keogan, S., Clancy, L., & Regan, C. L. (2019) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-019-3653-4 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Hilts, K. E., Corelli, R. L., Prokhorov, A. V., Zbikowski, S. M., Zillich, A. J., & Hudmon, K. S. (2022) · Pharmacy · doi:10.3390/pharmacy10030056 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Wittekind, C. E., Takano, K., Sckopke, P., Winkler, M. H., Werner, G. G., Ehring, T. W., & Rüther, T. (2022) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-022-06155-6 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Encouraging smoking cessation in Ramadan in primary care
Mughal, F., & Kingstone, T. (2018) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.14272 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Kozlowski, L. T. (2016) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.13515 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Park, J., Lim, M. K., Kim, Y., Paek, Y., & Cho, S. (2024) · Tobacco Induced Diseases · doi:10.18332/tid/178499 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Emery, J. L., Leonardi‐Bee, J., Coleman, T. J., McDaid, L., & Naughton, F. (2024) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntae026 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationPharmacist-led Smoking Cessation Services: Current and Future Perspectives
Sui, C. F., & Ming, L. C. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-813035-3.00053-8 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Borsari, L., Storani, S., Malagoli, C., Filippini, T., Tamelli, M., Malavolti, M., Nicolini, F., & Vinceti, M. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15061234 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Cutting edge smoking cessation support: SCIMITAR+
Robson, D., & McNeill, A. D. (2019) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30131-2 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Cox, S., Shahab, L., Garnett, C. V., Lindson, N., & Jackson, S. E. (2025) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2025.113017 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationSOCIAL SUPPORT AND SMOKING BEHAVIOR IN TRADITIONAL ISLAMIC BOARDING SCHOOLS OF ACEH BESAR
Ismail, I., & Bustami, B. (2020) · International Journal of Education and Social Science Research · doi:10.37500/ijessr.2020.3620 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Fulton, E. A., Newby, K. V., Kwah, K., Schumacher, L. T., Gokal, K., Jackson, L., Naughton, F., Coleman, T. J., Owen, A., & Brown, K. (2021) · Public Health Research · doi:10.3310/phr09050 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationSupporting smokers’ quit attempts reduces national smoking prevalence
Coleman, T. J. (2019) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-213265 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationIQOS® Cross-Sectional and Cohort US Study DocumentationPreprint
Noggle, B., Cheng, H. G., Iyer, S., & Vansickel, A. (2023) · Qeios · doi:10.32388/vkd77j · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Choulika, S., & Faou, A.-L. L. (2016) · L Encéphale · doi:10.1016/j.encep.2015.12.026
Cummings, K. M., & Carpenter, M. J. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30125-3
Hiscock, R., Asikainen, A. H., Tuomisto, J. T., Jantunen, M. J., Pärjälä, E., & Sabel, C. E. (2019) · Preventive Medicine Reports · doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100842
Self-citationRasmussen, M. (2018) · Clinical Health Promotion - Research and Best Practice for patients staff and community · doi:10.29102/clinhp.18010
Sanders, C. J., Lindenmeyer, A., & Marriott, J. J. (2020) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-17174/v1
Sivabalah, K., Crane, D., Neville, S., Hancock, M., Ryan, A., Ajay, B., Coyne, J., Benbow, E., Crossfield, A., Bate, S. G., et al. (2024) · JTO Clinical and Research Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100674
Hemingway, C. (2025) · InnovAiT Education and inspiration for general practice · doi:10.1177/17557380251331521
IQOS® Cross-Sectional and Cohort US Study DocumentationPreprint
Noggle, B., Cheng, H. G., Iyer, S., & Vansickel, A. R. (2023) · Qeios · doi:10.32388/vkd77j.2
Card-Gowers, J., Webber, L., Goldspink, H. G., O’Connor, A., McGee, M., Rice, S., MHlthEcon, B. F., & Seidler, Z. E. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9719583/v1
Green, M., Harper, S., Telfer-Thomas, E., Agrawal, S., Callister, M. E. J., Lane, J. L., Warren, G. W., Murray, R. L., Evison, M., Sheikh, M., et al. (2026) · The Lancet Regional Health - Europe · doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2026.101869
- Authors
- Dobbie, F., Hiscock, R., Leonardi-Bee, J., Murray, S., Shahab, L., Aveyard, P., Coleman, T., McEwen, A., McRobbie, H., Purves, R., & Bauld, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Stirling (GB)
- UK Centre for Tobacco & Alcohol Studies (GB)
- UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, UK
- University of Oxford (GB)
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Bauld, Linda
- ORCID
- Venue
- Health Technology Assessment
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 95
- Pages
- 1-156
- ISSN
- 1366-5278 (ISSN-L)
- 2046-4924
- PMC
- PMC4781027
- OpenAlex
- W2179606242
- Semantic Scholar
- ce17d280de28f37020d985240fcbeb2485279e05
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 97
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 10.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Health Technology Assessment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure (University of Bath) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
- The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Health Technology Assessment programme (09/161/01)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
- Keywords
- NHS Stop Smoking Services, smoking cessation, long-term abstinence, carbon monoxide breath test, behavioral support, nicotine replacement therapy, self-help materials, client satisfaction, well-being, England, NHS Health Scotland
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Behavior Therapy, Cost-Benefit Analysis, England, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, State Medicine, Smoking Cessation, Outcome Assessment, Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review