The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Do Women Have More Adverse Drug Reactions?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sex Differences in the Expression of Hepatic Drug Metabolizing Enzymes
Waxman, D. J., & Holloway, M. G. (2009) · Molecular Pharmacology · doi:10.1124/mol.109.056705 · Cited by 815
Predicting risk of adverse drug reactions in older adults
Lavan, A. H., & Gallagher, P. (2016) · Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety · doi:10.1177/2042098615615472 · Cited by 455
Representation of Women in Randomized Clinical Trials of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention
Melloni, C., Berger, J. S., Wang, T. Y., Gunes, F., Stebbins, A., Pieper, K. S., Dolor, R. J., Douglas, P. S., Mark, D. B., & Newby, L. K. (2010) · Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · doi:10.1161/circoutcomes.110.868307 · Cited by 455
Sex-gender differences in irritable bowel syndrome
Kim, Y. S., & Kim, N. (2018) · Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility · doi:10.5056/jnm18082 · Cited by 322
Sex Differences in Cancer: Epidemiology, Genetics and Therapy
Kim, H.-I., Lim, H., & Moon, A. (2018) · Biomolecules & Therapeutics · doi:10.4062/biomolther.2018.103 · Cited by 315
Metadata
- Authors
- Rademaker, M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 349-351
- ISSN
- 1175-0561 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010993971
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do Women Have More Adverse Drug Reactions? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2165/00128071-200102060-00001
- The paper
- Rademaker, M. (2001). Do Women Have More Adverse Drug Reactions? American Journal of Clinical Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.2165/00128071-200102060-00001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
