Cited by 455Sex and Gender in HealthcareDiversity and Career in MedicineEthics in Clinical Research

Representation of Women in Randomized Clinical Trials of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention

Melloni, Chiara, Berger, Jeffrey S., Wang, Tracy Y., Gunes, Funda, Stebbins, Amanda, Pieper, Karen S., Dolor, Rowena J., Douglas, Pamela S. +2 more·2010·Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

Abstract

Background— The 2007 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention in women drew heavily on results from randomized clinical trials; however, representation of women in trials of cardiovascular disease prevention has not been systematically assessed. Methods and Results— We abstracted 156 randomized clinical trials cited by the 2007 women’s prevention guidelines to determine female representation over time and by clinical indication, prevention type, location of trial conduct, and funding source. Both women and men were represented in 135 of 156 (86.5%) trials; 20 trials enrolled only men; 1 enrolled only women. Among all trials, the proportion of women increased significantly over time, from 9% in 1970 to 41% in 2006. Considering only trials that enrolled both women and men, female enrollment was 18% in 1970 and increased to 34% in 2006. Female representation was higher in international versus United States–only trials (32.7% versus 26.7%) and primary versus secondary prevention trials (42.6% versus 26.6%). Female enrollment was comparable in government/foundation-funded versus industry-funded trials (31.9% versus 31.5%). Representation of women was highest among trials in hypertension (44%), diabetes (40%), and stroke (38%) and lowest for heart failure (29%), coronary artery disease (25%), and hyperlipidemia (28%). By contrast, women accounted for 53% of all individuals with hypertension, 50% with diabetes, 51% with heart failure, 49% with hyperlipidemia, and 46% with coronary artery disease. Sex-specific results were discussed in only 31% of primary trial publications. Conclusions— Enrollment of women in randomized clinical trials has increased over time but remains low relative to their overall representation in disease populations. Efforts are needed to reach a level of representation that is adequate to ensure evidence-based sex-specific recommendations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circoutcomes.110.868307

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some treatments that currently exist for several diseases are not adequately evaluated in women, who are likely to be underrepresented in clinical trials, especially in Phases I and II.

    “some of the treatments that currently exist for several diseases are not adequately evaluated in women27,28 who are likely to be underrepresented in clinical trials29,30, especially in Phases I and II31,32.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Melloni, C., Berger, J. S., Wang, T. Y., Gunes, F., Stebbins, A., Pieper, K. S., Dolor, R. J., Douglas, P. S., Mark, D. B., & Newby, L. K.
Affiliations
Duke Medical Center (US)
Venue
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Published
2010-03
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
135-142
ISSN
  • 1941-7705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-7713
OpenAlex
W2139998668
Cited by
455
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 31
FWCI
30.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Centre International de Recherche sur le Cancer
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
Keywords
women in clinical trials, cardiovascular disease prevention, gender representation, clinical trial recruitment, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, coronary artery disease, hyperlipidemia, stroke, trial funding, American Heart Association guidelines
MeSH terms
Age Factors, American Heart Association, Cardiovascular Diseases, Drug Industry, Female, Financing, Government, Humans, Male, Primary Prevention, Research Support as Topic, Sex Factors, Time Factors, United States, Women's Health Services, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Women's Health, Treatment Outcome, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Patient Selection, Evidence-Based Medicine, Research Subjects, Health Status Disparities, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review