Cited by 13Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism

Safety of the Combination of Intensive Cholesterol-Lowering Therapy with Oral Anticoagulation Medication in Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

Enajat, Morteza, Teerenstra, Steven, van Kuilenburg, Janet T., van Sorge-Greve, Aty H.N., Albers-Akkers, Marjo T.H., Verheugt, Freek W.A., Pop, Gheorghe A.M.·2009·Drugs & Aging

Abstract

Background The incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is very high in the elderly, and often oral anticoagulation (OAC) is indicated to prevent thromboembolism.Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of combining intensive cholesterol-lowering therapy with OAC in elderly patients with AF.Methods In a randomized, double-blind trial, 34 patients received OAC plus atorvastatin 40 mg/day and ezetimibe 10 mg/day versus placebo over 1 year. Dose adjustments of OAC served as an indicator of an interaction between HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) and OAC. Safety was evaluated by the occurrence of bleeding and a rise in AST, ALT and creatine phosphokinase.Results Compared with a 6-month pre-intervention period, the mean daily dose +/- standard error of OAC was 4.4 +/- 1.5% lower in the treatment group (p = 0.003) and virtually the same in the placebo group (change from baseline: -0.1 +/- 1.3%, p = 0.96). The mean daily dose of OAC stabilized after 3 months. In the 6-month post-intervention period, OAC dosing showed no statistically significant change from baseline: -1.9 +/- 1.9% in the placebo arm and -2.6 +/- 2.1% in the intervention arm.Conclusion We conclude that in elderly AF patients treated with OAC, intensive cholesterol-lowering therapy (atorvastatin 40 mg/day and ezetimibe 10 mg/day) is well tolerated. No increased risk in bleeding was found.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2165/10558450-000000000-00000

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Enajat, M., Teerenstra, S., van Kuilenburg, J. T., van Sorge-Greve, A. H. N., Albers-Akkers, M. T. H., Verheugt, F. W. A., & Pop, G. A. M.
Affiliations
Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
Corresponding author
Enajat, Morteza
Venue
Drugs & Aging
Published
2009-07
Volume
26
Issue
7
Pages
585-593
ISSN
1170-229X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058711306
Cited by
13
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drugs & Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, oral anticoagulation, cholesterol-lowering therapy, atorvastatin, ezetimibe, statin-drug interactions, elderly patients, bleeding risk, drug safety, dose adjustment, thromboprophylaxis
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Anticholesteremic Agents, Anticoagulants, Atrial Fibrillation, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Drug Interactions, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Hemorrhage, Humans, Male, Placebo Effect, Endpoint Determination, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review