Cited by 97Pharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

A policy model to evaluate the benefits, risks and costs of warfarin pharmacogenomic testing

Meckley, Lisa M., Gudgeon, James M., Anderson, Jeffrey L., Williams, Marc S., Veenstra, David L.·2010·PharmacoEconomics

Abstract

Background In 2007, the US FDA added information about pharmacogenomics to the warfarin label based on the influence of the CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genes on anticoagulation-related outcomes. Payers will be facing increasing demand for coverage decisions regarding this technology, but the potential clinical and economic impacts of testing are not clear. Objective To develop a policy model to evaluate the potential outcomes of warfarin pharmacogenomic testing based on the most recently available data. Methods A decision-analytic Markov model was developed to assess the addition of genetic testing to anticoagulation clinic standard care for a hypothetical cohort of warfarin patients. The model was based on anticoagulation status (international normalized ratio), a common outcome measure in clinical trials that captures both the benefits and risks of warfarin therapy. Initial estimates of testing effects were derived from a recently completed randomized controlled trial (n = 200). Healthcare cost ($US, year 2007 values) and health-state utility data were obtained from the literature. The perspective was that of a US third-party payer. Probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the range of plausible results. Results The policy model included thromboembolic events (TEs) and bleeding events and was populated by data from the COUMAGEN trial. The rate of bleeding calculated for standard care approximated bleeding rates found in an independent cohort of warfari…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2165/11318240-000000000-00000

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • STMs used to evaluate screening strategies consider two types: one-time screening or repeated interval screening.

    “STMs used to evaluate screening strategies [16,17] consider two types: one-time screening, (e.g., of newborns [18] or genetic screening [19 -21]) or repeated (interval) screening (e.g., for cancer [22][23][24][25] or HIV [26,27]).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meckley, L. M., Gudgeon, J. M., Anderson, J. L., Williams, M. S., & Veenstra, D. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Intermountain Healthcare (US)
Corresponding author
Veenstra, David L.
Venue
PharmacoEconomics
Published
2010-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
61-74
ISSN
1170-7690 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059533196
Cited by
97
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 16
FWCI
10.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PharmacoEconomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Washington
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1u18gd000005-01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Keywords
warfarin, pharmacogenetic testing, CYP2C9, VKORC1, anticoagulation, cost-effectiveness, bleeding risk, thromboembolic events, international normalized ratio, genotyping cost, health technology assessment, quality-adjusted life years
MeSH terms
Anticoagulants, Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Costs and Cost Analysis, Health Policy, Humans, Markov Chains, Pharmacogenetics, Genetic Variation, Warfarin, Models, Organizational, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, International Normalized Ratio, Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review