Granular ferric hydroxide—a new adsorbent for the removal of arsenic from natural water
Abstract
Research Article| February 01 1998 Granular ferric hydroxide—a new adsorbent for the removal of arsenic from natural water W. Driehaus; W. Driehaus *GEH Wasserchemie GmbH & Co. KG, Heinrich Hasemeier Straße 33, D-49076 Osnabrück Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar M. Jekel; M. Jekel †Technical University of Berlin, Dep. of Water Quality Control, Secr. KF 4, Straße des 17. Juni 135, D-10623 Berlin Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar U. Hildebrandt U. Hildebrandt ‡Fachhochschule Braunschweig-Wolfenbüttel, Labour für Wassertechnik, Salzdahlumer Straße 46–48, D-38302 Wolfenbüttel, Germany Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-Aqua (1998) 47 (1): 30–35. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.1998.0005 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Cite Icon Cite Permissions Search Site Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsThis Journal Search Advanced Search Citation W. Driehaus, M. Jekel, U. Hildebrandt; Granular ferric hydroxide—a new adsorbent for the removal of arsenic from natural water. Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-Aqua 1 February 1998; 47 (1): 30–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.1998.0005 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Granular ferric hydroxide (GFH) is an adsorbent, developed for arsenic removal from natural water. It can be applied in simple fixed bed reactors, similar to those for activated alumina or activated carbon. GFH has a high adsorption capacity in model systems and in natural waters. The application of GFH in test adsorbers showed a high treatment capacity of 30 000–40 000 bed volumes, until the new German and WHO drinking water standard for arsenic of 10 μg/L was exceeded. The residue of this technique is a solid waste, enriched with arsenic. The typical residual mass is in the range of 5–25 g/m3 treated water. This new technique for arsenic removal provides a simple and effective method, particularly for small water facilities. This content is only available as a PDF. © IWA Publishing 1998 You do not currently have access to this content.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Various pretreatments like impregnation with Fe, alum, manganese acetate, and posthydrolysis have been explored at lab scale to improve the adsorption efficiency of activated alumina with promising results.
“Various pretreatments like impregnation with Fe [173, 175], alum [176], manganese acetate [177], and posthydrolysis [177] have also been explored at lab scale to improve the adsorption efficiency of AA with promising results.”
From Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater: A Review of Sources, Prevalence, Health Risks, and Strategies for Mitigation (2014) · cites this paper as [175]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters
Smedley, P. L., & Kinniburgh, D. G. (2002) · Applied Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0883-2927(02)00018-5 · Cited by 7,691 · see citing works
Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents—A critical review
Mohan, D., & Pittman, C. U. (2007) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.006 · Cited by 3,536 · see citing works
Shankar, S., Shanker, U., & Shikha (2014) · The Scientific World Journal · doi:10.1155/2014/304524 · Cited by 616 · see citing works
“Ferrihydrite, granular ferric hydroxide, and hydrous ferric oxide are the most widely explored iron oxides and hydroxides for the removal of As yielding promising results for both AsIII and AsV removals [174, 180–184].”
BackgroundIron and aluminium based adsorption strategies for removing arsenic from water
Giles, D. E., Mohapatra, M., Issa, T. B., Anand, S., & Singh, P. (2011) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.07.018 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Efficient removal of arsenic using plastic waste char: Prevailing mechanism and sorption performance
Singh, E., Kumar, A., Khapre, A., Saikia, P., Shukla, S. K., & Kumar, S. (2020) · Journal of Water Process Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.101095 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
- Authors
- Driehaus, W., Jekel, M., & Hildebrandt, U.
- Affiliations
- Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
- Ostfalia University of Applied Sciences (DE)
- Venue
- Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology—AQUA
- Publisher
- IWA Publishing
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 30-35
- ISSN
- 0003-7214 (ISSN-L)
- 1605-3974
- OpenAlex
- W36781903
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 4.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- AQUA - Water Infrastructure Ecosystems and Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
- Keywords
- granular ferric hydroxide, arsenic removal, adsorption, natural water treatment, fixed-bed reactor, adsorbent development, drinking water treatment, iron-based adsorbents, activated carbon comparison, arsenic speciation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review