Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 403

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mercury sorption by silica/carbon nanotubes and silica/activated carbon: a comparison study

Saleh, Tawfik A.·2015·Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology - Aqua

Abstract

Research Article| August 13 2015 Mercury sorption by silica/carbon nanotubes and silica/activated carbon: a comparison study Tawfik A. Saleh Tawfik A. Saleh 1Chemistry Department, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia E-mail: tawfikas@hotmail.com Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-Aqua (2015) 64 (8): 892–903. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2015.050 Article history Received: April 10 2015 Accepted: July 06 2015 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Cite Icon Cite Permissions Search Site Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsThis Journal Search Advanced Search Citation Tawfik A. Saleh; Mercury sorption by silica/carbon nanotubes and silica/activated carbon: a comparison study. Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-Aqua 9 December 2015; 64 (8): 892–903. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2015.050 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Nanocomposites of silica incorporated with carbon nanotubes (silica/CNT) and activated carbon (silica/AC) were synthesized and characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), element mapping, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Silica/CNT and silica/AC were investigated for efficient removal of mercury ions from aqueous solutions. The adsorbents have been analyzed on the basis of adsorption capacity, reusability, and their application in packed columns. The effects of experimental parameters, like pH, contact time and initial concentrations on the adsorption of mercury ions, were optimized. The kinetic data for the adsorption process obeyed a pseudo-second-order kinetic model with R2 of 0.999. Fitting the data to an intraparticle diffusion model indicated that surface adsorption and intraparticle diffusion were concurrently operating. In addition, this study used the Langmuir, Freundlich and Temkin isotherms to describe the behaviour of equilibrium adsorption. The equilibrium adsorption of the studied mercury ions is best fitted using the Freundlich isotherm, with silica/CNT of higher capacity than silica/AC. The silica/CNT showed better performance than silica/AC indicating silica/CNT has better efficiency. adsorption, kinetics, mercury, nanocomposite © IWA Publishing 2015 You do not currently have access to this content.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2166/aqua.2015.050

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Cited by

See all 403

Metadata

Authors
Saleh, T. A.
Venue
Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology - Aqua
Published
2015-08-13
Volume
64
Issue
8
Pages
892-903
ISSN
  • 0003-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1605-3974
OpenAlex
W2235970043
Cited by
403
References
20
FWCI
23.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mercury sorption by silica/carbon nanotubes and silica/activated carbon: a comparison study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2166/aqua.2015.050
The paper
Saleh, T. A. (2015). Mercury sorption by silica/carbon nanotubes and silica/activated carbon: a comparison study. Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology - Aqua. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2015.050

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.