Quality control of hourly rain gauge data based on radar and satellite multi-source data
Open accessAbstract
ABSTRACT Rain gauge networks provide direct precipitation measurements and have been widely used in hydrology, synoptic-scale meteorology, and climatology. However, rain gauge observations are subject to a variety of error sources, and quality control (QC) is required to ensure the reasonable use. In order to enhance the automatic detection ability of anomalies in data, the novel multi-source data quality control (NMQC) method is proposed for hourly rain gauge data. It employs a phased strategy to reduce the misjudgment risk caused by the uncertainty from radar and satellite remote-sensing measurements. NMQC is applied for the QC of hourly gauge data from more than 24,000 hydro-meteorological stations in the Yangtze River basin in 2020. The results show that its detection ratio of anomalous data is 1.73‰, only 1.73% of which are suspicious data needing to be confirmed by experts. Moreover, the distribution characteristics of anomaly data are consistent with the climatic characteristics of the study region as well as measurement and maintenance modes of rain gauges. Overall, NMQC has a strong ability to label anomaly data automatically, while identifying a lower proportion of suspicious data. It can greatly reduce manual intervention and shorten the impact time of anomaly data in the operational work.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Compared with traditional approaches, multi-source collaborative QC methods integrate various observational data and effectively reduce the false alarm rate in anomaly detection.
“Compared with traditional approaches, these methods integrate various observational data, including Doppler weather radar, geostationary meteorological satellite, and weather detector, effectively reducing the false alarm rate in anomaly detection [27][28][29].”
From A Machine Learning-Based Quality Control Algorithm for Heavy Rainfall Using Multi-Source Data (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
Multi-source data collaborative QC for precipitation has demonstrated significant advantages.
“With the advancement of ground-and satellite-based observation technologies and the explosive growth of meteorological data, multi-source data collaborative QC for precipitation has demonstrated significant advantages [27][28][29][30][31].”
From A Machine Learning-Based Quality Control Algorithm for Heavy Rainfall Using Multi-Source Data (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
When an observed hourly precipitation has a lower CR, the record is highly likely to be attributed to manual operational errors, such as garden watering or cleaning the gauge without disconnecting communication.
“Consequently, when an observed hourly precipitation with a lower CR, the record is highly likely to be attributed to manual operational errors, such as garden watering, cleaning the gauge without disconnecting communication [23,28,29].”
From A Machine Learning-Based Quality Control Algorithm for Heavy Rainfall Using Multi-Source Data (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
Anomalously high minute-level precipitation values were likely induced by instrumental malfunctions, such as persistent false triggering of a reed switch in a tipping-bucket rain gauge due to metal fatigue or foreign object adhesion.
“These anomalously high minute values were likely to be induced by instrumental malfunctions [14,21,25,29], such as the persistent false triggering of a reed switch in a tipping-bucket rain gauge due to metal fatigue or foreign object adhesion, leading to an abnormally high count within a single minute.”
From A Machine Learning-Based Quality Control Algorithm for Heavy Rainfall Using Multi-Source Data (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
The discrepancy between low PRE_1m_Max and high hourly precipitation is likely caused by data encoding or transmission errors.
“This discrepancy is likely caused by data encoding or transmission errors [25,29];”
From A Machine Learning-Based Quality Control Algorithm for Heavy Rainfall Using Multi-Source Data (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
The occurrence of negative values in minute precipitation exposes errors in data encoding or transmission, such as improper sign bit handling or data type conversion errors.
“Therefore, the occurrence of negative values exposes errors in the data encoding or transmission, such as improper sign bit handling or data type conversion errors [25,29].”
From A Machine Learning-Based Quality Control Algorithm for Heavy Rainfall Using Multi-Source Data (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Machine Learning-Based Quality Control Algorithm for Heavy Rainfall Using Multi-Source Data
Sun, H., Zhou, Q., Shi, L., Li, C., Qin, S., Yao, D., Xu, M., Huang, Y., Hu, Q., & Guan, Y. (2025) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs17243976 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yan, Q., Zhang, B., Jiang, Y., Liu, Y., Yang, B., & Wang, H.
- Affiliations
- Hainan Meteorology Administration (CN)
- a Hubei Meteorological Information and Technology Support Center, Wuhan 430074, China
- Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Yan, Qiaoqiao
- Venue
- Journal of Hydroinformatics
- Publisher
- IWA Publishing
- Published
- 2024-04-18
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1042-1058
- ISSN
- 1464-7141 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-1734
- OpenAlex
- W4394932143
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 1.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Hydroinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Yangtze River Basin Meteorological Open Fund Project (CJLY2022Y08)
- Key Laboratory of South China Sea Meteorological Disaster Prevention and Mitigation of Hainan Province Open Fund Project (SCSF202209)
- China Yangtze Power Company Limited Scientific Research Project (2423020002)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Environmental Monitoring and Data Management
- Keywords
- hourly rainfall, multi-source data fusion, radar remote sensing, satellite remote sensing, precipitation measurement error, Yangtze River Basin
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review