CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 41Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiologyFecal contamination and water qualityPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prevalence and types of Campylobacter on poultry farms and in their direct environment

Open access
Schets, Franciska M., Jacobs-Reitsma, Wilma F., van der Plaats, Rozemarijn Q. J., Heer, Lianne Kerkhof-De, van Hoek, Angela H. A. M., Hamidjaja, Raditijo A., de Roda Husman, Ana Maria, Blaak, Hetty·2017·Journal of Water and Health
DOI 10.2166/wh.2017.119
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

To study whether broiler and layer farms contribute to the environmental Campylobacter load, environmental matrices at or close to farms, and caecal material from chickens, were examined. Similarity between Campylobacter from poultry and environment was tested based on species identification and Multilocus Sequence Typing. Campylobacter prevalence in caecal samples was 97% at layer farms (n = 5), and 93% at broiler farms with Campylobacter-positive flocks (n = 2/3). Campylobacter prevalence in environmental samples was 24% at layer farms, and 29% at broiler farms with Campylobacter-positive flocks. Campylobacter was detected in soil and surface water, not in dust and flies. Campylobacter prevalence in adjacent and remote surface waters was not significantly (P > 0.1) different. Detected species were C. coli (52%), C. jejuni (40%) and C. lari (7%) in layers, and C. jejuni (100%) in broilers. Identical sequence types (STs) were detected in caecal material and soil. A deviating species distribution in surface water adjacent to farms indicated a high background level of environmental Campylobacter. STs from layer farms were completely deviant from surface water STs. The occasional detection of identical STs in broilers, wastewater at broiler farms and surface water in the farm environment suggested a possible contribution of broiler farms to the aquatic environmental Campylobacter load.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2166/wh.2017.119

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 2015, Distribution, numbers, and diversity of ESBL-producing E. coli in the poultry farm environment, Plos One, 10, e0135402, 10.1371/journal.pone.0135402 · DOI
  2. 2014, Incidence and trends of infection with pathogens transmitted commonly through food – foodborne diseases active surveillance network, 10 U.S. sites, 2006–2013, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 63, 328
  3. 2002, Molecular characterization of Campylobacter jejuni clones: a basis for epidemiologic investigation, Emerging Infectious Diseases, 8, 949, 10.3201/eid0809.02-0122 · DOI
  4. 2012, Source attribution of human campylobacteriosis using a meta-analysis of case-control studies of sporadic infections, Epidemiology and Infection, 140, 970, 10.1017/S0950268811002676 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 2013, Foodborne Campylobacter: infections, metabolism, pathogenisis and reservoirs, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10, 6292, 10.3390/ijerph10126292 · DOI
  6. European Food Safety Authority, 2014, The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2012, EFSA Journal, 12, 3547, 10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3547 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 2016, A QMRA for the transmission of ESBL-producing E. coli and Campylobacter from poultry farms to humans through flies, Risk Analysis, 36, 215, 10.1111/risa.12433 · DOI
  8. 2012, Poultry culling and campylobacteriosis reduction among humans, the Netherlands, Emerging Infectious Diseases, 18, 466, 10.3201/eid1803.111024 · DOI
  9. 2004, Flies and Campylobacter infection of broiler flocks, Emerging Infectious Diseases, 10, 1490, 10.3201/eid1008.040129 · DOI
  10. 2007, Correlations between Campylobacter spp. prevalence in the environment and broiler flocks, Journal of Applied Microbiology, 103, 640, 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03291.x · DOI
  11. 2005, Development of real-time PCR and hybridization methods for detection and identification of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in pig faecal samples, Journal of Applied Microbiology, 99, 292, 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02616.x · DOI
  12. 2001, Campylobacters in water, sewage and the environment, Journal of Applied Microbiology Symposium Supplement, 30, 68S
  13. 2012, Prevalence of coliforms, Salmonella, Listeria, and Campylobacter associated with eggs and the environment of conventional cage and free-range egg production, Poultry Science, 91, 1195, 10.3382/ps.2011-01795 · DOI
  14. 2010, Trends in Campylobacter incidence in broilers and humans in six European countries, 1997–2007, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 93, 33, 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.09.015 · DOI
  15. 2003, Development of a sensitive DNA microarray suitable for rapid detection of Campylobacter spp, Molecular and Cellular Probes, 17, 187, 10.1016/S0890-8508(03)00052-5 · DOI
  16. 2012, Investigation of prevalence and risk factors for Campylobacter in broiler flocks at slaughter: results from a UK survey, Epidemiology and Infection, 140, 1725, 10.1017/S0950268812000982 · DOI
  17. 2013, Campylobacteriosis in urban versus rural areas: a case-case study integrated with molecular typing to validate risk factors and to attribute sources of infection, Plos One, 8, e83731, 10.1371/journal.pone.0083731 · DOI
  18. 2012, Risk factors for campylobacteriosis of chicken, ruminant, and environmental origin: a combined case-control and source attribution analysis, Plos One, 7, e42599, 10.1371/journal.pone.0042599 · DOI
  19. 2016, Quantifying potential sources of surface water contamination by Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli, Water Research, 101, 36, 10.1016/j.watres.2016.05.069 · DOI
  20. 2005, Pathogen survival during livestock manure storage and following land application, Bioresource Technology, 96, 135, 10.1016/j.biortech.2004.02.030 · DOI
  21. 2009, Campylobacter excreted into the environment by animal sources: prevalence, concentration shed, and host association, Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, 6, 1161, 10.1089/fpd.2009.0327 · DOI
  22. 2011, Molecular epidemiology of Campylobacter isolates from poultry production units in Southern Ireland, Plos One, 6, e28490, 10.1371/journal.pone.0028490 · DOI
  23. 2013, Human infections with new subspecies of Campylobacter fetus, Emerging Infectious Diseases, 19, 1679
  24. 2010, Occurrence of thermotolerant Campylobacter species in surface waters of a Mediterranean area and in its prevailing pollution sources, Journal of Applied Microbiology, 109, 1027, 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04725.x · DOI
  25. 2002, The dioxin crisis as experiment to determine poultry-related Campylobacter enteritis, Emerging Infectious Diseases, 8, 174
  26. 2013, Landscape and seasonal factors influence Salmonella and Campylobacter prevalence in a rural mixed use watershed, Water Research, 47, 6075, 10.1016/j.watres.2013.07.028 · DOI
  27. 2013, The role of environmental reservoirs in human campylobacteriosis, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10, 5886, 10.3390/ijerph10115886 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schets, F. M., Jacobs-Reitsma, W. F., van der Plaats, R. Q. J., Heer, L. K.-D., van Hoek, A. H. A. M., Hamidjaja, R. A., de Roda Husman, A. M., & Blaak, H.
Affiliations
  • National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL)
  • National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Centre for Zoonoses and Environmental Microbiology, Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, Bilthoven 3721 MA, The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Schets, Franciska M.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Water and Health
Publisher
IWA Publishing
Published
2017-09-14
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
849-862
ISSN
  • 1477-8920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1996-7829
DOI
10.2166/wh.2017.119
OpenAlex
W2755364363
Cited by
41
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Water and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Rivm Repository (Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
  • Rivm (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fecal contamination and water quality
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Keywords
Campylobacter, poultry farms, broiler chickens, laying hens, environmental contamination, soil, surface water, Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli, Campylobacter lari, multilocus sequence typing, sequence types, wastewater, zoonotic transmission
MeSH terms
Farms, Animals, Animal Husbandry, Campylobacter, Environmental Microbiology, Netherlands, Poultry, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Multilocus Sequence Typing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review