Cited by 22Fecal contamination and water qualityFood Safety and HygieneWater Resource Management and Quality

Sachet water quality and product registration: a cross-sectional study in Accra, Ghana

Open access
Dzodzomenyo, M., Fink, G., Dotse-Gborgbortsi, W., Wardrop, N., Aryeetey, G., Coleman, N., Hill, A., Wright, J.·2018·Journal of Water and Health

Abstract

The study's objectives were to assess the extent to which packaged water producers follow product registration procedures and to assess the relationship between product registration and drinking water quality in Accra, Ghana. Following preliminary analysis of a national water quality survey, 118 packaged sachet water samples were collected by sampling all brands sold by 66 vendors. A sample of vendors was selected from two high-income and two low-income areas of Accra, Ghana. Sachet packaging and labelling details were recorded and compared to a regulatory database to assess product registration. All samples were weighed and tested for faecal indicator bacteria and selected physico-chemical parameters. Product registration numbers and brand names could be matched to regulatory records for 77 of 118 sachets (65.2%). All samples tested were compliant with national water quality standards for faecal indicator bacteria and nitrate. Brand registration was not associated with any of the quality indicators considered. The results of this study suggest that while a substantial proportion of sachet water is sold without formal product registration, the microbial quality of the unlicensed water is consistently high in Accra, Ghana. Further examination of regulatory enforcement and monitoring will be needed to ensure sustained high water quality over time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2166/wh.2018.055

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dzodzomenyo, M., Fink, G., Dotse-Gborgbortsi, W., Wardrop, N., Aryeetey, G., Coleman, N., Hill, A., & Wright, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Ghana (GH)
  • School of Public Health, University of Ghana, P.O. Box LG13, Legon, Accra, Ghana
Corresponding author
Wright, J.
Venue
Journal of Water and Health
Published
2018-05-30
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
646-656
ISSN
  • 1477-8920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1996-7829
OpenAlex
W2805201672
Cited by
22
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Water and Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (acceptedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel)
Funders
  • Department for International Development
  • Medical Research Council (MR/M008940/1)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (2123367)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fecal contamination and water quality
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
Keywords
sachet water, bottled water quality, product registration, regulatory compliance, fecal indicator bacteria, nitrate, physicochemical parameters, Accra, Ghana
MeSH terms
Ghana, Humans, Food Packaging, Water Quality, Drinking Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review