Cited by 28Fecal contamination and water qualityWater Treatment and DisinfectionChild Nutrition and Water Access

Effects of Sachet Water Consumption on Exposure to Microbe-Contaminated Drinking Water: Household Survey Evidence from Ghana

Open access
Wright, Jim, Dzodzomenyo, Mawuli, Wardrop, Nicola, Johnston, Richard, Hill, Allan, Aryeetey, Genevieve, Adanu, Richard·2016·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

There remain few nationally representative studies of drinking water quality at the point of consumption in developing countries. This study aimed to examine factors associated with E. coli contamination in Ghana. It drew on a nationally representative household survey, the 2012−2013 Living Standards Survey 6, which incorporated a novel water quality module. E. coli contamination in 3096 point-of-consumption samples was examined using multinomial regression. Surface water use was the strongest risk factor for high E. coli contamination (relative risk ratio (RRR) = 32.3, p < 0.001), whilst packaged (sachet or bottled) water use had the greatest protective effect (RRR = 0.06, p < 0.001), compared to water piped to premises. E. coli contamination followed plausible patterns with digit preference (tendency to report values ending in zero) in bacteria counts. The analysis suggests packaged drinking water use provides some protection against point-of-consumption E. coli contamination and may therefore benefit public health. It also suggests viable water quality data can be collected alongside household surveys, but field protocols require further revision.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph13030303

Cites

29 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Ghana, GWCL treats piped water, running two treatment plants in Accra, but water supplied to consumers is frequently microbially contaminated.

    “In Ghana, the Ghana Water Company Limited (GWCL) is the national urban water utility and while GWCL treats piped water, running two treatment plants in Accra, water supplied to consumers is frequently microbially contaminated (Wright et al.  ).”

    From Characteristics of packaged water production facilities in Greater Accra, Ghana: implications for water safety and associated environmental impacts (2020) · cites this paper as Wright et al. 2016

    The Data section (2.1; page unavailable) calls the Ghana Water Company the main utility. The Discussion (section 4; page unavailable) reports E. coli contamination even in piped supplies, supporting the contamination point. Our copy does not say that GWCL treats piped water or runs two treatment plants in Accra, and its household samples do not establish how frequently GWCL-supplied water is contaminated. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A nationally representative water quality survey found significantly lower E. coli contamination in sachet water compared with water piped to the home.

    “while a nationally representative water quality survey found signi fi cantly lower E. coli contamination in sachet water compared with water piped to the home (Wright et al.  ).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [18]World Health Organization Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality. Vol. 3—Surveillance and Control of Community Supplies World Health Organization Geneva, Switzerland 1997

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wright, J., Dzodzomenyo, M., Wardrop, N., Johnston, R., Hill, A., Aryeetey, G., & Adanu, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • University of Ghana (GH)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
Corresponding author
Wright, Jim
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2016-03-09
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
303
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2295316460
Cited by
27
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Research Councils UK (MR/M008940/1)
  • Department for International Development, UK Government (MR/M008940/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fecal contamination and water quality
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
Keywords
sachet water, bottled water, Escherichia coli contamination, drinking water quality, surface water use, piped water, Ghana
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Environmental Exposure, Escherichia coli, Ghana, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Water Microbiology, Water Pollution, Water Quality, Drinking Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review