The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biofuels and implications for agricultural water use: blue impacts of green energy
Abstract
Rising energy prices, geopolitics and concerns over the impact of greenhouse gas emissions on climate change are increasing the demand for biofuel production. At present biofuel production is estimated at 35 billion liters, accounting only for a small part (∼2%) of the 1200 billion liters of annual gasoline consumption worldwide. But the contribution of biofuels to energy supply is expected to grow fast with beneficial impacts including reductions in greenhouse gasses, improved energy security and new income sources for farmers. However, biomass production for energy will also compete with food crops for scarce land and water resources, already a major constraint on agricultural production in many parts of the world. China and India, the world's two largest producers and consumers of many agricultural commodities, already face severe water limitations in agricultural production, yet both have initiated programs to boost biofuel production. This paper explores the land and water implications of increased biofuel production globally and with special focus on these two important countries, using the WATERSIM model. It concludes that, although of lesser concern at the global level, local and regional impact could be substantial. In fact, the strain on water resources would be such in China and India that it is unlikely that policy makers will pursue biofuel options, at least those based on traditional field crops.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Engineering Yeast Transcription Machinery for Improved Ethanol Tolerance and Production
Alper, H., Moxley, J., Nevoigt, E., Fink, G. R., & Stephanopoulos, G. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1131969 · Cited by 823 · cited 1×
“However, compared to fossil fuels, biofuels are still relatively costly (IEA, 2004a) though with the introduction of new more efficient techniques–such as the use of yeast (Alper et al., 2006) and enzymes to produce lignocellulosic bioethanol–production costs may come down in coming decades.”
Background
Cited by
An outlook on microalgal biofuels
Wijffels, R. H., & Barbosa, M. J. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1189003 · Cited by 1,886
Biomass for a sustainable bioeconomy: An overview of world biomass production and utilization
Antar, M., Lyu, D., Nazari, M., Shah, A., Zhou, X., & Smith, D. L. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110691 · Cited by 878
Dobriyal, P., Qureshi, A., Badola, R., & Hussain, S. A. (2012) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.06.021 · Cited by 573
Mohr, A., & Raman, S. (2013) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.033 · Cited by 447
Satisfying future water demands for agriculture
de Fraiture, C., & Wichelns, D. (2010) · Agricultural Water Management · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2009.08.008 · Cited by 441
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- de Fraiture, C., Giordano, M., & Liao, Y.
- Venue
- Water Policy
- Publisher
- IWA Publishing
- Published
- 2008-03-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 67-81
- ISSN
- 1366-7017 (ISSN-L)
- 1996-9759
- OpenAlex
- W2118194068
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 41.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biofuels and implications for agricultural water use: blue impacts of green energy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2166/wp.2008.054
- The paper
- de Fraiture, C., Giordano, M., & Liao, Y. (2008). Biofuels and implications for agricultural water use: blue impacts of green energy. Water Policy. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2008.054
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.