Cited by 18Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater TreatmentWastewater Treatment and ReuseWetland Management and Conservation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Constructed wetlands: a solution to water quality issues in Mexico?

García-García, P. L., Ruelas-Monjardín, L., Marín-Muñíz, J. L.·2016·Water Policy

Abstract

Historically, water sanitation has not been a priority for any sector of society in Mexico, and substantial technical and ecological problems exist in this country's wastewater treatment systems. Constructed wetlands (CWs) have proven to be an exceptional alternative, particularly for rural areas in developing countries. This paper identifies the status of research on CWs in Mexico, and discusses the possibilities for their use. Our review showed that interest in CWs in Mexico is growing exponentially, particularly in academic institutions. Consequently, published documents are mostly on experimental wetlands, although there are a few experienced groups devoted to producing technology and providing training needed to apply CWs. CWs are generally used for domestic wastewater treatment, disregarding other pollution sources such as agriculture and industry. Rural communities have the most potential to obtain and apply this technology, but unfortunately their degree of use of these systems is still very low. The current status of research and application of CWs leads to a few options discussed in this paper to promote their use in Mexico, taking into account that the success of these alternatives can only be achieved by partnering with governments, water treatment companies, non-governmental organizations, academic institutions and rural communities.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2166/wp.2015.172

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Aboites, 2008, Pendientes nacionales del agua
  2. Carabias, 2005, Agua, medio ambiente y sociedad: hacia la gestión integral de los recursos hídricos en México
  3. Day, 2004, Environmental diagnosis of the Gulf of Mexico: Executive summary [in Spanish], 15
  4. De Anda, 2007, Modificaciones en el régimen hidrológico y sus efectos en la acumulación de fósforo y fosfatos en el lago de Chapala, México, Interciencia, 32, 100
  5. Domínguez, 2013, El monitoreo social del derecho humano al agua y saneamiento
  6. Fontana, 2000, The interview: from structured questions to negotiated text, 645
  7. Hansen, 2011, Evaluación de la contaminación en cuencas hidrológicas: prioridades y necesidades
  8. Hansen, 2005, El lago de Chapala: destino final del río Lerma, 33
  9. Jiménez, 2005, El agua en México vista desde la academia
  10. Lakshman, 1987, Eco technological opportunities for aquatic plants, a survey of utilization options, 49
  11. Martínez-Ruiz, 2012, Tradición prehispánica mesoamericana y simbolismo prehispánico del agua. Segunda parte
  12. Moreno-Vázquez, 2010, Los acuíferos sobreexplotados: origen, crisis y gestión social. Capítulo 4, 79
  13. Oakley, 2011, Tratamiento de Aguas Residuales Domésticas en Centroamérica Un Manual de Experiencias, Diseño, Operación y Sostenibilidad
  14. Olivares, 2008, El agua potable en México. Historia reciente, actores, procesos y propuestas
  15. Parr, 2000, Wastewater treatment options, Waterlines, the Journal of Appropriate Technologies for Water Supply and Sanitation, 18, 15
  16. Rabalais, 2004, Hipoxia en el Golfo de México
  17. Rojas-Rabiela, 2012, El agua en la antigua Mesoamérica: usos y tecnología. Primera parte, 11
  18. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT), 2008, Informe de la situación del medio ambiente en México
  19. Setty, 2007, Manual de Construcción: Humedales Construidos para el Tratamiento de Aguas negras, Bren School of Environmental Science and Management

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
García-García, P. L., Ruelas-Monjardín, L., & Marín-Muñíz, J. L.
Affiliations
  • El Colegio de Veracruz (MX)
  • El Colegio de Veracruz, Carrillo Puerto No. 26, Centro, Xalapa, Veracruz 91000, Mexico
Venue
Water Policy
Published
2015-11-25
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
654-669
ISSN
  • 1366-7017 (ISSN-L)
  • 1996-9759
OpenAlex
W2277150682
Cited by
18
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Water Policy (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana
  • Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Wetland Management and Conservation
Keywords
constructed wetlands, wastewater treatment, water quality, domestic wastewater, Mexico, technology adoption, stakeholder collaboration, non-governmental organizations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review