The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Degradation of Membrane Concentrates of the Textile Industry by Fenton Like Reactions in Iron-Free Solutions at Biocompatible pH Values (pH ≈ 7–8)
Abstract
Degradative oxidation of membrane concentrates of textile waters were carried out in batch reactors in the dark and under visible light. H2O2 and Nafion-Fe3+/H2O2 as an immobilized Fenton reagent were used as ecological oxidants. The results observed with the Nafion/Fe3+ system lead to a kinetically faster and more complete oxidation than H2O2 alone and comparable to the homogeneous Fenton reaction in solution. This study reports on the Fenton treatment of membrane concentrates resulting from nanofiltration of biologically treated secondary textile effluents produced in a large scale in Northern Italy. The degradation of the membrane concentrates is accelerated under light due to the recycling of the Fe3+-ion in the Nafion avoiding the drawbacks of the homogeneous treatment. A reduction of ∼ 50% is seen in the TOC and of ∼20–50% in optical absorbance after 3 hours pretreatment under light for end of pipe membrane concentrates under light and the process was stable over many cycles. The observed degradation depended on the amount of H2O2, the intensity of the visible light applied. But it varied very little on the pretreatment pH which makes the Fenton immobilized systems suitable to pretreat membrane concentrates up to pH 8. The membrane concentrates showed a decrease in their toxicology when undergoing oxidative pretreatment under visible light mediated by Nafion-Fe3+ (1.78%) adding in solution H2O2 (10 mM). Mathematical modeling of the degradation parameters is presented by constructing a single exponential polynomial function.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For instance, Fenton-like treatment using Nafion-Fe +3 membrane, rather than direct addition of iron salt 17 , or immobilized TiO 2 photocatalysis rather than photo-Fenton process 164 would facilitate further biological treatment under biocompatible pH making neutralization redundant.”
From Hybrid Treatment Systems for Dye Wastewater (2007) · cites this paper as [17]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pignatello, J. J., Oliveros, E., & MacKay, A. (2006) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643380500326564 · Cited by 4,133
Hybrid Treatment Systems for Dye Wastewater
Hai, F. I., Yamamoto, K., & Fukushi, K. (2007) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643380601174723 · Cited by 557
Metadata
- Authors
- Balanosky, E., Fernandez, J., Kiwi, J., & Lopez, A.
- Venue
- Water Science and Technology
- Publisher
- IWA Publishing
- Published
- 1999-08-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4-5
- Pages
- 417-424
- ISSN
- 0273-1223
- 1996-9732
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review