The DOI matches its Crossref record.
GAC Adsorption of Ozonated Secondary Textile Effluents for Industrial Water Reuse
Abstract
The paper presents the results obtained at laboratory, pilot and demonstrative scale with granular activated carbon adsorption as a mean to obtain effluent suitable as water supply for textile finishing industries, that require very stringent limits in terms of COD and colour removal. Laboratory scale tests evidenced that the specific carbon adsorption capacity, both for COD and colour, is highest for a sand-filtered + clariflocculated effluent and lowest for the sand-filtered + ozonated secondary effluent. Pilot and demonstrative scale tests were performed on three filters (0.3, 0.3 and 20 m3 of GAC each) fed with the full scale ozonated secondary effluent.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, in case of oxidative degradation, subsequent substrate adsorption on carbon may plummet 23 .”
From Hybrid Treatment Systems for Dye Wastewater (2007) · cites this paper as [23]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hybrid Treatment Systems for Dye Wastewater
Hai, F. I., Yamamoto, K., & Fukushi, K. (2007) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643380601174723 · Cited by 557
Metadata
- Authors
- Bergna, G., Bianchi, R., & Malpei, F.
- Venue
- Water Science and Technology
- Publisher
- IWA Publishing
- Published
- 1999-08-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4-5
- Pages
- 435-442
- ISSN
- 0273-1223
- 1996-9732
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GAC Adsorption of Ozonated Secondary Textile Effluents for Industrial Water Reuse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2166/wst.1999.0620
- The paper
- Bergna, G., Bianchi, R., & Malpei, F. (1999). GAC Adsorption of Ozonated Secondary Textile Effluents for Industrial Water Reuse. Water Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1999.0620