The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Urban water management in cities: historical, current and future regimes
Open accessAbstract
Drawing from three phases of a social research programme between 2002 and 2008, this paper proposes a framework for underpinning the development of urban water transitions policy and city-scale benchmarking at the macro scale. Through detailed historical, contemporary and futures research involving Australian cities, a transitions framework is proposed, presenting a typology of six city states, namely the ‘Water Supply City’, the ‘Sewered City’, the ‘Drained City’, the ‘Waterways City’, the ‘Water Cycle City’, and the ‘Water Sensitive City’. This framework recognises the temporal, ideological and technological contexts that cities transition through when moving towards sustainable urban water conditions. The aim of this research is to assist urban water managers with understanding the scope of the hydro-social contracts currently operating across cities in order to determine the capacity development and cultural reform initiatives needed to effectively expedite the transition to more sustainable water management and ultimately to Water Sensitive Cities. One of the values of this framework is that it can be used by strategists and policy makers as a heuristic device and/or the basis for a future city state benchmarking tool. From a research perspective it can be an underpinning framework for future work on transitions policy research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Environmental political economy, technological transitions and the state
Meadowcroft, J. (2005) · New Political Economy · doi:10.1080/13563460500344419 · Cited by 179
Cited by
Water on an urban planet: Urbanization and the reach of urban water infrastructure
McDonald, R. I., Weber, K., Padowski, J., Flörke, M., Schneider, C., Green, P. A., Gleeson, T., Eckman, S., Lehner, B., Balk, D., et al. (2014) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.022 · Cited by 786
Rethinking urban water management: Experimentation as a way forward?
Farrelly, M., & Brown, R. (2011) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.007 · Cited by 326
Self-citationA critical review of integrated urban water modelling – Urban drainage and beyond
Bach, P. M., Rauch, W., Mikkelsen, P. S., McCarthy, D. T., & Deletic, A. (2014) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.12.018 · Cited by 326
Green infrastructure for sustainable urban water management: Practices of five forerunner cities
Liu, L., & Jensen, M. B. (2018) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2017.11.013 · Cited by 307
Principles for urban stormwater management to protect stream ecosystems
Walsh, C. J., Booth, D. B., Burns, M. J., Fletcher, T. D., Hale, R. L., Hoang, L. N., Livingston, G., Rippy, M. A., Roy, A. H., Scoggins, M., et al. (2016) · Freshwater Science · doi:10.1086/685284 · Cited by 209
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, R. R., Keath, N., & Wong, T. H. F.
- Venue
- Water Science and Technology
- Publisher
- IWA Publishing
- Published
- 2009-03-01
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 847-855
- ISSN
- 0273-1223 (ISSN-L)
- 1996-9732
- OpenAlex
- W2001969417
- Cited by
- 722
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 100.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Urban water management in cities: historical, current and future regimes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2166/wst.2009.029
- The paper
- Brown, R. R., Keath, N., & Wong, T. H. F. (2009). Urban water management in cities: historical, current and future regimes. Water Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2009.029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.