Cited by 209Urban Stormwater Management SolutionsHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesIntegrated Water Resources Management

Principles for urban stormwater management to protect stream ecosystems

Open access
Walsh, Christopher J., Booth, Derek B., Burns, Matthew J., Fletcher, Tim D., Hale, Rebecca L., Hoang, Lan N., Livingston, Grant, Rippy, Megan A. +3 more·2016·Freshwater Science

Abstract

Urban stormwater runoff is a critical source of degradation to stream ecosystems globally. Despite broad appreciation by stream ecologists of negative effects of stormwater runoff, stormwater management objectives still typically center on flood and pollution mitigation without an explicit focus on altered hydrology. Resulting management approaches are unlikely to protect the ecological structure and function of streams adequately. We present critical elements of stormwater management necessary for protecting stream ecosystems through 5 principles intended to be broadly applicable to all urban landscapes that drain to a receiving stream: 1) the ecosystems to be protected and a target ecological state should be explicitly identified; 2) the postdevelopment balance of evapotranspiration, stream flow, and infiltration should mimic the predevelopment balance, which typically requires keeping significant runoff volume from reaching the stream; 3) stormwater control measures (SCMs) should deliver flow regimes that mimic the predevelopment regime in quality and quantity; 4) SCMs should have capacity to store rain events for all storms that would not have produced widespread surface runoff in a predevelopment state, thereby avoiding increased frequency of disturbance to biota; and 5) SCMs should be applied to all impervious surfaces in the catchment of the target stream. These principles present a range of technical and social challenges. Existing infrastructural, institutional, or g…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/685284

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Potential co-benefits of water-sensitive urban stormwater designs include maintaining and protecting local water supply, mitigating flooding, resistance to climate change, and increased human well-being.

    “Maintaining and protecting local water supply, mitigating flooding (Fletcher et al. 2013), resistance to climate change (Harris 2018), and increased human well-being are potential co-benefits of "water-sensitive" urban stormwater designs (Walsh et al. 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walsh, C. J., Booth, D. B., Burns, M. J., Fletcher, T. D., Hale, R. L., Hoang, L. N., Livingston, G., Rippy, M. A., Roy, A. H., Scoggins, M., & Wallace, A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Oregon State University (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • United States Geological Survey (US)
  • Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Walsh, Christopher J.
  • Booth, Derek B.
  • Burns, Matthew J.
  • Fletcher, Tim D.
  • Hale, Rebecca L.
  • Hoang, Lan N.
  • Livingston, Grant
  • Rippy, Megan A.
  • Roy, Allison H.
  • Scoggins, Mateo
  • Wallace, Angela
Venue
Freshwater Science
Published
2016-03-01
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
398-411
ISSN
  • 2161-9549 (ISSN-L)
  • 2161-9565
OpenAlex
W2302908787
Cited by
209
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 3
FWCI
14.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
Freshwater Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Integrated Water Resources Management
Keywords
urban stormwater management, stormwater control measures, runoff volume reduction, impervious surfaces, ecological restoration, climate change adaptation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review