Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 44Simulation-Based Education in HealthcareInnovations in Medical EducationSurgical Simulation and Training

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Introduction and Effectiveness of Simulation-based Learning in Medical Education

Open access

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To contribute to reforming the medical education system in Japan, we visited overseas medical schools and observed the methods utilized in medical education. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We visited 28 medical schools and five institutes in the United States, Europe, Australia and Asia in 2008. We met deans and specialists in medical affairs and observed the medical schools' facilities. RESULTS: Among the several effective educational methods used in overseas medical schools, simulation-based learning was being used in all that we visited. Simulation-based learning is used to promote medical students' mastery of communication skills, medical interviewing, physical examination and basic clinical procedures. Students and tutors both recognize the effectiveness of simulation-based learning in medical education. CONCLUSION: In contrast to overseas medical schools, simulation-based learning is not common in Japan. There remain many barriers to introduce simulation-based education in Japan, such as a shortage of medical tutors, staff, mannequins and budget. However, enhancing the motivation of tutors is likely the most important factor to facilitate simulation-based education in Japanese medical schools to become common place.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2169/internalmedicine.48.2373

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Graber MA, Wyatt C, Kasparek L, et, 2005, Acad Emerg Med, 12, 635, 10.1197/j.aem.2005.01.009 · DOI
  2. Nara N, 2008, Med Educ (Japan), 39, 365
  3. Nara N, Ito M, Gotoh E, et al, 2007, Med Educ (Japan), 38, 275

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Nara, N., Beppu, M., Tohda, S., & Suzuki, T.
Affiliations
Tokyo Medical and Dental University (JP)
Venue
Internal Medicine
Published
2009
Volume
48
Issue
17
Pages
1515-1519
ISSN
  • 0918-2918 (ISSN-L)
  • 1349-7235
OpenAlex
W2033350390
Cited by
43
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
Keywords
simulation-based training, medical education, medical schools, communication skills, medical interview, physical examination, medical procedures, medical tutors, Japan
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Computer Simulation, Curriculum, Education, Medical, Humans, Learning, Schools, Medical, Patient Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review