The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A PHYSIOLOGICAL STUDY OF EPILEPTIC SEIZURES FOLLOWING CORTICAL STIMULATION IN ANIMALS AND ITS APPLICATION TO HUMAN CLINICS
Open accessAbstract
1. Nicotinization (as well as picrotoxinization and metrazolization) applied to grey matters of the cerebral cortex, thalamus, midbrain, and cerebellar cortex produces selectively generalized clonic convulsion in dogs and apes; but that applied to the white matter or nerve causes no motor effects.2. By chemical stimulation and the method of elimination, the author confirmed the path of clonic convulsion as follows:thalamus (contralateral) thalamus (homolateral) Substantia nigra (contralateral) cerebrum→lenticular nuclei→Substantia nigra (homolateral)→(crossed)→anterior horn cell of spinal cord→skeletal muscle3. From the cerebellar cortex clonic convulsion was produced with or without cerebrum. The path passes through the thalamus to the lenticular nucleus, to the homolateral midbrain.4. After severing the lenticular nuclei of both sides, the clonic convulsion initiated in the cerebral cortex, thalamus, cerebellum or lenticular nucleus itself was completely abolished in dogs.5. Unitateral lenticotomy was applied to epileptic patients with partial success. Not only the fit of seizures, but also the fit of loss of consciousness was eradicated in successful cases. A very high cure rate is anticipated with bilateral lenticotomy.6. From the fact that cerebral clonic convulsion was produced in dogs in which the medullary pyramids had been severed, and that its path has several relay nuclei to the spinal cord, it must be considered that this system belongs to the extrapyramidal system.7. Some substances elicit tonic convulsions (TK) from the cerebrum and others alternating convulsions (LK). Thus the method of chemical stimulation can fractionate the action of the motor cells in experiments on the central nervous system, and elucidate the path of each system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Glutamate as a neurotransmitter in the brain: review of physiology and pathology
Meldrum, B. S. (2000) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/130.4.1007s · Cited by 1,667
Substantia Nigra: Site of Anticonvulsant Activity Mediated by γ-Aminobutyric Acid
Iadarola, M. J., & Gale, K. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7146907 · Cited by 592
Influence of glutamate and GABA transport on brain excitatory/inhibitory balance
Sears, S. M., & Hewett, S. J. (2021) · Experimental Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1177/1535370221989263 · Cited by 336
Evidence implicating substantia nigra in regulation of kindled seizure threshold
McNamara, J., Galloway, M., Rigsbee, L., & Shin, C. (1984) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.04-09-02410.1984 · Cited by 299
Book Review: Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors: Electrical and Chemical Signaling Properties
Coutinho, V., & Knöpfel, T. (2002) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858402238514 · Cited by 144
Metadata
- Authors
- HAYASHI, T.
- Venue
- The Japanese Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Physiological Society of Japan
- Published
- 1952
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 46-64
- ISSN
- 0021-521X (ISSN-L)
- 1881-1396
- OpenAlex
- W2205947437
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A PHYSIOLOGICAL STUDY OF EPILEPTIC SEIZURES FOLLOWING CORTICAL STIMULATION IN ANIMALS AND ITS APPLICATION TO HUMAN CLINICS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2170/jjphysiol.3.46
- The paper
- HAYASHI, T. (1952). A PHYSIOLOGICAL STUDY OF EPILEPTIC SEIZURES FOLLOWING CORTICAL STIMULATION IN ANIMALS AND ITS APPLICATION TO HUMAN CLINICS. The Japanese Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.2170/jjphysiol.3.46
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.