Gasification combined cycle: Carbon dioxide recovery, transport, and disposal
Open accessAbstract
The objective of the project is to develop engineering evaluations of technologies for the capture, use, and disposal of carbon dioxide (CO{sub 2}). This project emphasizes CO{sub 2}-capture technologies combined with integrated gasification combined-cycle (IGCC) power systems. Complementary evaluations address CO{sub 2} transportation, CO{sub 2} use, and options for the long-term sequestering of unused CO{sub 2}. Commercially available CO{sub 2}-capture technology is providing a performance and economic baseline against which to compare innovative technologies. The intent is to provide the CO{sub 2} budget, or an {open_quotes}equivalent CO{sub 2}{close_quotes} budget, associated with each of the individual energy-cycle steps, in addition to process design capital and operating costs. The value used for the {open_quotes}equivalent CO{sub 2}{close_quotes} budget is 1 kg of CO{sub 2} per kilowatt-hour (electric). The base case is a 458-MW IGCC system that uses an air-blown Kellogg-Rust-Westinghouse agglomerating fluidized-bed gasifier, Illinois No. 6 bituminous coal feed, and in-bed sulfur removal. Mining, feed preparation, and conversion result in a net electric power production of 454 MW, with a CO{sub 2} release rate of 0.835 kg/kWhe. Two additional life-cycle energy balances for emerging technologies were considered: (1) high-temperature CO{sub 2} separation with calcium- or magnesium-based sorbents, and (2) ambient-temperature facilitated-transport polymer membranes for acid-gas removal.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The use of low temperatures in the solvent is in agreement with the reported in the consulted sources for the Selexol process.
“The use of low temperatures in the solvent is in agreement with the reported in the consulted sources for the Selexol™ process [8,9,37].”
From Integration of hydrothermal liquefaction and carbon capture and storage for the production of advanced liquid biofuels with negative CO2 emissions (2020) · cites this paper as [37]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Xu, G., Liang, F., Yang, Y., Hu, Y. Y., Zhang, K., & Liu, W. (2014) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en7053484 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Padurean, A., Cormos, C.-C., & Agachi, P.-S. (2012) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.12.007 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
CO2 control technology effects on IGCC plant performance and cost
Chen, C., & Rubin, E. S. (2008) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.093 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Natural Gas Decarbonization to Reduce CO2 Emission From Combined Cycles—Part I: Partial Oxidation
Lozza, G. G., & Chiesa, P. (2000) · Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power · doi:10.1115/1.1395581 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Lozano, E. M., Pedersen, T. H., & Rosendahl, L. A. (2020) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115753 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Valle, C. R., Perales, A. L. V., Vidal-Barrero, F., & Gómez‐Barea, A. (2013) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.024 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Processes and simulations for solvent-based CO2 capture and syngas cleanup
Adams, T. A., Salkuyeh, Y., & Nease, J. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-59566-9.00006-5 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Jiang, Y., & Bhattacharyya, D. (2016) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.5b04285 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Oxygen-blown gasification combined cycle: Carbon dioxide recovery, transport, and disposal
Doctor, R. D., Molburg, J. C., & Thimmapuram, P. (1997) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/s0196-8904(96)00330-5 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationPre-combustion carbon-capture technologies for power generation: an engineering-economic assessment
Lorenzo, G. D., Barbera, P., Ruggieri, G., Witton, J., Pilidis, P., & Probert, D. (2013) · International Journal of Energy Research · doi:10.1002/er.3029 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Improving a Pre-Combustion CCS Concept in Gas Turbine Combined Cycle for CHP Production
Suomalainen, M., Arasto, A., Teir, S., & Siitonen, S. (2013) · Energy Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.114 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
A novel IGCC system with steam injected H2/O2 cycle and CO2 recovery
Duan, L., Lin, R., Deng, S., et al. (2003) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2003.08.001 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
A comparison of greenhouse gas mitigation options
Reck, R. A., & Hoag, K. J. (1997) · Energy · doi:10.1016/s0360-5442(96)00108-9 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Jiang, Y., & Bhattacharyya, D. (2015) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b00360 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Sanchez, E. L., Paulsen, M. M., Ferrari, F. A., & Pedersen, T. H. (2024) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.3c04157 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Hydrogen production and carbon dioxide recovery from KRW oxygen-blown gasification
Doctor, R. D., Chess, K. L., Brockmeier, N. F., et al. (1999) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-008043018-8/50011-4 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationTechno-Economic Studies of Coal-Biomass to Liquids (CBTL) Plants with CO2 Capture and Storage (CCS)
Jiang, Y. (2017) · doi:10.33915/etd.5888 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Jadoon, U. K., Bhatnagar, P., Florez-Orrego, D. A., Domingos, M. E. G. R., Rodríguez, M., & Marechal, F. M. A. (2026) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.6c00217
- Authors
- Argonne National Lab., I. (. S., Doctor, R., USDOE, W., Molburg, J., Thimmapuram, P., Berry, G., & Livengood, C.
- Published
- 1994-09-01
- OpenAlex
- W4242753363
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.osti.gov
- Locations
- University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) (submittedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)
- DOE (W-31109-ENG-38)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Mining and Gasification Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Keywords
- integrated gasification combined cycle, CO2 capture, CO2 transport, CO2 sequestration, CO2 utilization, fluidized bed gasification, Illinois No. 6 coal, desulfurization, carbon balance, calcium sorbent, polymer membranes, acid gas removal, power plant emissions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
