CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 99Industrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionVisual perception and processing mechanismsNon-Destructive Testing Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Visual inspection: a review of the literature

Open access
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), See, Judi, Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)·2012
DOI 10.2172/1055636
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

are based. Articles pertaining to research into actinide interactions with carbonate minerals are summarized. Select articles involving trace element-carbonate mineral interactions are also reviewed and may serve as templates for future research. A bibliography of related articles is included. Americium(III), and its nonradioactive analog neodymium(III), partition strongly from aqueous solutions into carbonate minerals. Recent thermodynamic, kinetic, and surface studies show that Nd is preferentially removed from solution, forming a Nd-Ca carbonate solid solution. Neptunium(V) is rapidly removed from solution by carbonates. Plutonium incorporation into carbonates is complicated by multiple oxidation states. Little research has been done on the radium(H) and thorium(IV) carbonate systems. Removal of uranyl ion from solution by calcite is limited to monolayer surface coverage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2172/1055636

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Bloomfield, J.R. (1975). Studies on visual search. In C.G. Drury and J.G. Fox (Eds.), Human Reliability in Quality Control (pp. 31-43). London: Taylor & Francis.
  2. Craig, A. (1984). Human engineering: The control of vigilance. In J.S. Warm (Ed.), Sustained attention in human performance (pp. 247-291). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  3. Davies. D.R., & Parasuraman. R. (1932). The psychology of vigilance. London: Academic Press.
  4. Dember, W.N., & Warm, J.S. (1979). Psychology of perception (2 nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart. & Winston.
  5. Drury, C.G. (1989). The information environment in inspection. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Human Factors in Aging Aircraft. Falls Church, VA: Biotechnology, Inc.
  6. Drury, C.G. (1992). Inspection performance. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial Engineering (2 nd ed.) (pp. 2282-2314). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  7. Drury, C.G., & Fox, J.G. (1975). The imperfect inspector. In C.G. Drury and J.G. Fox (Eds.), Human Reliability in Quality Control (pp.11-16). London: Taylor & Francis.
  8. Drury, C.G., Karwan, M.H., & Vanderwarker, D.R. (1986). The two-inspector problem. IIE Transactions, 18, 174-181.
  9. Drury, C.G., & Lock, M.W.B. (1992). Ergonomics in civil aircraft inspection. In E.J. Lovesey, Contemporary Ergonomics (pp. 116-123). London: Taylor & Francis.
  10. Drury, C.G., & Prabhu, P.V. (1992). Human factors in test and inspection. In G. Salvendy & W. Karwowski (Eds.), Handbook of Human Factors in Advanced Manufacturing. New York: Wiley.
  11. Fox, J.G. (1977). Quality control of coins. In H.G. Maule and J.S.Weiner (Eds.). Case Studies in Ergonomics Practice, Vol. 1. London, Taylor & Francis.
  12. Gramopadhye, A.K., Melloy, B.J., Chen, B.J., & Bingham, J. (2000). Use of computer based training for aircraft inspection: Findings and recommendations. Proceedings of the HFES/IEA Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA.
  13. Graybeal, B.A., Phares, B.M., Rolander, D.D., Moore, M., & Washer, G. (2002). Visual inspection of highway bridges. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 21, 67- 83.
  14. Heida, J.H. (1989). Characterization of inspection performance. In J. Boogard and G.M. van Dijk (Eds.), Non-Destructive Testing (Proc. 12 th World Conference) (pp. 1711-1716). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  15. Jacob, R.J., Raina, S., Regunath, S., Subramanian, R., & Gramopadhye, A.K. (2004). Improving inspector's performance and reducing errors: General aviation training inspection systems (GAITS). Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48 th Annual Meeting, 48, 203-207.
  16. Jerison. H.J. (1963). On the decrement function in human vigilance. In D. N. Buckner & J. J. McGrath (Eds.). Vigilance: A symposium (pp. 199-212). New York: McGraw- Hill.
  17. Juran, J.M., & Gryna, F.M. (1988). Inspection and test. In J.M. Juran (Ed.), Juran's Quality Control Handbook ( 3 rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  18. Kommidi, S., Dharwada, P., Gramopadhye, A.K., Cho, B.R., & Grimes, L. (2005). Evaluation of human performance in a supervisory inspection task monitoring multiple hybrid inspection systems. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 49, 573-577.
  19. Rasmussen, J. (1983). Skills, rules, knowledge: Signals, signs, and symbols and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions: Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-13, 257-267.
  20. Wiener, E.L. (1975). Individual and group differences in inspection. In C.G. Drury and J.G. Fox (Eds.), Human Reliability in Quality Control (pp.101-122). London: Taylor & Francis. 128. Wiener, E.I. (1984). Vigilance and inspection. In J.S. Warm (Ed.), Sustained Attention in Human Performance (pp. 207-246). Chichester: Wiley. 129.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 99

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
(NNSA), U. N. N. S. A., See, J., & Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), A.
Affiliations
  • Office of Scientific and Technical Information (US)
  • Sandia National Laboratories (US)
Corresponding author
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
ORCID
See, Judi
Publisher
Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)
Published
2012-10-01
DOI
10.2172/1055636
OpenAlex
W2297976743
Cited by
99
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
  • DOE (AC04-94AL85000)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
Keywords
visual inspection, inspection methods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review