Cited by 14Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesAlgal biology and biofuel productionCatalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Whole Algae Hydrothermal Liquefaction: 2014 State of Technology

Open access
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States), Jones, Susanne, USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), Zhu, Yunhua, Snowden-Swan, Lesley, Anderson, Daniel, Hallen, Richard, Schmidt, Andrew, Albrecht, Karl, Elliott, Douglas·2014

Abstract

This report describes the base case yields and operating conditions for converting whole microalgae via hydrothermal liquefaction and upgrading to liquid fuels. This serves as the basis against which future technical improvements will be measured.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2172/1165327

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One of the foundations of this work integrates CHG with the HTL system, but cannot achieve its $3 GGE-1 MFSP target, as the cost of HTL with CHG already surpasses $3 GGE-1 without even factoring in the cost of biomass.

    “It should be noted that one of the foundations of this work integrates CHG with the HTL system [13], but cannot achieve its $3 GGE -1 MFSP target, as the cost of HTL with CHG already surpasses $3 GGE -1 without even factoring in the cost of biomass.”

    From Microalgae to biofuels through hydrothermal liquefaction: Open-source techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment (2021) · cites this paper as [13]

    The paper integrates CHG with HTL and reports diesel selling prices above its $3/GGE performance goal. But Table 6 (Modeled conversion cost progression; page unavailable) puts conversion costs, including CHG and excluding feedstock, at $2.36/GGE for the 2014 case and $1.18/GGE for the 2022 projection—not above $3/GGE as claimed. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Jones et al. (2014) reported an MFSP of $1.19 LGE-1 ($4.49 GGE-1) assuming a biomass purchase price of $430 dry ton-1.

    “The model developed in this work was first validated against the original work in Jones et al. (2014), which reported an MFSP (in 2011$) of $1.19 LGE -1 ($4.49 GGE -1 ) assuming a biomass purchase price of $430 dry ton -1 [13].”

    From Microalgae to biofuels through hydrothermal liquefaction: Open-source techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment (2021) · cites this paper as [13]

    Table 6 (Modeled conversion cost progression; page unavailable) gives a $430 per US ton algae feedstock cost for the 2022 projection. It lists $4.49 per gallon of diesel, not per GGE, and $15.57 per gallon for the 2014 state-of-technology case. The cited passage does not report an MFSP of $1.19/LGE ($4.49/GGE). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Some of the most detailed HTL model assessments to date in Jones et al. (2014) and Knorr et al. (2013) have not yet developed a sensitivity analysis for varying reaction temperature.

    “Some of the most detailed HTL model assessments to date in Jones et al. (2014) [13] and Knorr et al. (2013) [24] have not yet developed a sensitivity analysis for varying reaction temperature.”

    From Microalgae to biofuels through hydrothermal liquefaction: Open-source techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment (2021) · cites this paper as [13]

    Section 1.0 identifies this report as a modeled assessment of AHTL costs, and section 1.3 describes its model inputs and planned work on space velocity. The passages found do not establish the claim that a reaction-temperature sensitivity analysis had not yet been developed, or that this was among the most detailed HTL assessments. This verdict concerns Jones et al. only; the cited Knorr paper is not the source being audited. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Biomass price and fuel yield have the greatest effect on the minimum fuel selling price; higher biocrude yields and lower feedstock costs drive down the MFSP considerably.

    “Biomass price and fuel yield have the greatest effect on the minimum fuel selling price (MFSP); higher yields of biocrude and lower feedstock costs drive down the MFSP considerably, as demonstrated in sensitivity analyses of HTL in Jones et al. (2014) [13], Zhu et al. (2019) [14], and Gu et al. (2020) [15].”

    From Microalgae to biofuels through hydrothermal liquefaction: Open-source techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment (2021) · cites this paper as [13]

    In “Modeled conversion cost progression” (Table 6; page not provided), the projected case has lower feedstock cost, higher AHTL oil and diesel yields, and a substantially lower diesel selling price. The section also identifies dewatered algae cost as a significant factor in final fuel cost. But the table compares two cases with multiple changes; it does not establish through a sensitivity analysis that biomass price and fuel yield have the greatest effects on selling price. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The HTL system boundary contribution to GWP in Jones et al. (2014) varies between +9.1 and +20.5 g CO2 eq MJ-1 depending on system boundary assumptions.

    “The HTL system boundary contribution to GWP in Jones et al. (2014) varies between +9.1 and +20.5 g CO2 eq MJ -1 depending on system boundary assumptions [13]; however, differences in certain assumptions like fuel yield and nutrient recycle are not accounted for.”

    From Microalgae to biofuels through hydrothermal liquefaction: Open-source techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment (2021) · cites this paper as [13]

    Table 5 (Environmental Sustainability Metrics; page unavailable) reports 9.1 g CO₂-e/MJ fuel for the 2022 projected conversion plant, but does not report 20.5. It gives 20.0 for the 2014 case including summer algae drying and 20.4 for projected biogenic emissions; the figures therefore do not establish the claimed range as a result of system-boundary assumptions alone. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), R., Jones, S., (NNSA), U. N. N. S. A., Zhu, Y., Snowden-Swan, L., Anderson, D., Hallen, R., Schmidt, A., Albrecht, K., & Elliott, D.
Affiliations
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US)
Published
2014-06-01
OpenAlex
W2335815922
Cited by
14
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
  • DOE (AC05-76RL01830)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies
Keywords
hydrothermal liquefaction, microalgae, biofuel upgrading, liquid fuels, operating conditions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review