The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Carbon Dioxide Utilization (CO2U) ICEF Roadmap 2.0. Draft October 2017
Open accessAbstract
Last year, experts from CO2 Sciences, Columbia University and Valence Strategic came together to develop a roadmap. That document, Carbon Dioxide Utilization ICEF Roadmap 1.0, released at the UNFCCC Marrakesh Climate Change Conference in 2016, surveyed the commercial and technical landscape of CO2 conversion and use. The document provided extensive background and analysis and has helped to provide a foundation for additional studies, including this one.This roadmap is meant to complement and expand upon the work of its predecessor. Based in part on a workshop at Columbia University’s Center on Global Energy Policy in July 2017, it explores three distinct categories of CO2-based products, the technologies that can be harnessed to convert CO2 to these products, and the associated research and development needs. It also explores the complicated topic of life cycle analysis—critically important when considering the climate impacts of CO2 conversion and use—as well as policy tools that could be used to promote CO2-based products.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CO2 curing of concrete results in a concrete product with superior properties to conventional concrete and has already been successful in current markets.
“This results in a concrete product with superior properties to conventional concrete, and has already been successful in current markets.97,103,104”
From Utilization of mineral carbonation products: current state and potential (2019) · cites this paper as [97]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Utilization of mineral carbonation products: current state and potential
Woodall, C. M., McQueen, N., Pilorgé, H., & Wilcox, J. (2019) · Greenhouse Gases Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/ghg.1940 · Cited by 149
Monkman, S., Kenward, P., & Dipple, G. (2023) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c07480 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Sandalow, D., Aines, R., Friedmann, J., McCormick, C., & McCoy, S.
- Affiliations
- Center on Global Energy Policy (US)
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
- Valence Strategic, Washington, DC (United States)
- Published
- 2017-10-02
- OpenAlex
- W4244253274
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.osti.gov
- Locations
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy (DEAC5207NA27344, AC52‐07NA27344)
- Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (DE‐AC5207NA27344, AC52-07NA27344)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
- Keywords
- CO2 utilization, CO2 conversion, CO2 capture, life cycle assessment, research and development needs, policy instruments
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review