The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Manufacturing Cost Analysis for Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzers
Open accessAbstract
Hydrogen is produced by several means including water electrolysis where water molecules are split into hydrogen and oxygen. While there are several commercial electrolysis systems, proton exchange membrane (PEM) technology has emerged as a technology of choice in the last decade or so because of the versatile properties it possesses. High current and power densities and high efficiency values are among the advantages of the PEM electrolyzer over other commercial or near-commercial electrolysis systems such as alkaline or solid oxide. This study attempts to study the impact of manufacturing economies of scale on the cost of the PEM electrolyzer and how this can be linked to reducing the cost of hydrogen production. We found that adoption of the high throughput, automated manufacturing processes that have high process yields such as roll-to-roll manufacturing of catalyst coated membrane and advanced coating processes for metal plates, could push the cost for the PEM electrolyzer stack to the $323/kW level for an overall production volume of 10MW (e.g. 1 MW systems x 10 units/year). The stack cost can be pushed as low as $165/kW at 10,000 systems/year. We do not expect to see same rate of the cost reduction in the balance of plant because most parts are outsourced from part suppliers who offer limited discounts on their products. System cost including stack and balance of plant, could also be pushed down with economies of scale. The uninstalled system cost can be reduced from $515/kW at 10 units/year to $230/kW at 10,000 units/year.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Oxygen Evolution Reaction in Alkaline Environment: Material Challenges and Solutions
Xie, X., Du, L., Yan, L., Park, S., Qiu, Y., Sokolowski, J., Wang, W., & Shao, Y. (2022) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202110036 · Cited by 792
Wan, C., Zhang, Z., Dong, J., Xu, M., Pu, H., Baumann, D., Lin, Z., Wang, S., Huang, J., Shah, A. H., et al. (2023) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-023-01584-3 · Cited by 404
Vogt, E. T. C., & Weckhuysen, B. M. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07322-2 · Cited by 360
Decarbonization of the chemical industry through electrification: Barriers and opportunities
Mallapragada, D. S., Dvorkin, Y., Modestino, M. A., Esposito, D. V., Smith, W. A., Hodge, B.-M., Harold, M. P., Donnelly, V. M., Nuz, A., Bloomquist, C., et al. (2023) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2022.12.008 · Cited by 359
Longden, T., Beck, F. J., Jotzo, F., Andrews, R., & Prasad, M. (2022) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118145 · Cited by 325
Metadata
- Authors
- Mayyas, A., Ruth, M., Pivovar, B., Bender, G., & Wipke, K.
- Published
- 2019-08-13
- OpenAlex
- W2969602046
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Manufacturing Cost Analysis for Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2172/1557965
- The paper
- Mayyas, A., Ruth, M., Pivovar, B., Bender, G., & Wipke, K. (2019). Manufacturing Cost Analysis for Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzers. https://doi.org/10.2172/1557965
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.