The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Summary of Travel Trends 2001 National Household Travel Survey
Open accessAbstract
A complete comparison between the 1995 and 2001 survey methods is summarized in Appendix 2.While improvements to the survey process are encouraged, changes in the 1995 survey method brought about significant data compatibility issues.To address these issues, the 1990 survey data were adjusted to allow comparison to the 1995 survey.In this report, both the original 1990 data and the adjusted 1990 data are reported to facilitate trends analysis.The reader is advised to compare the 1969-1983 survey results to the unadjusted 1990 data, and the 1995 and 2001 survey results to the adjusted 1990 data.The method used to adjust the 1990 travel data is described in Appendix 3. REPORT ORGANIZATIONThis report highlights important travel trends in tabular and graphic format.Statistics are categorized by topic.The report begins with a summary of travel and demographic changes.Next, travel changes are examined from an individual household perspective, then from an individual person perspective.This report concludes with trip-making statistics of sub-populations such as women, households without vehicles, low-income households, and the elderly.No attempt is made in this report to present all of the data or to analyze and discuss the data in any depth.Standard error estimates for key statistics are presented in Appendix 4. 1995 NPTS 66,901 131,697 508 1.39 2001 NHTS 60,690 145,272 418 1.14 Walk TripsRespondents to the 2001 NHTS were specifically prompted to report walk trips.Since this was not done in the previous surveys, the increases in the number of walk trips can be explained, at least in part, by this change in methodology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Froehlich (2009) · doi:10.1145/1518701.1518861 · Cited by 563
Lee, B. A., Reardon, S. F., Firebaugh, G., Farrell, C. R., Matthews, S. A., & O'Sullivan, D. (2008) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240807300504 · Cited by 373
Dynamic ride sharing using traditional taxis and shared autonomous taxis: A case study of NYC
Lokhandwala, M., & Cai, H. (2018) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2018.10.007 · Cited by 246
Silvia, C., & Krause, R. M. (2016) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.039 · Cited by 175
The Poverty of the Carless: Toward Universal Auto Access
King, D. A., Smart, M. J., & Manville, M. (2022) · Journal of Planning Education and Research · doi:10.1177/0739456x18823252 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Hu, P.
- Published
- 2005-01-11
- OpenAlex
- W187022023
- Cited by
- 455
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Summary of Travel Trends 2001 National Household Travel Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2172/885762
- The paper
- Hu, P. (2005). Summary of Travel Trends 2001 National Household Travel Survey. https://doi.org/10.2172/885762
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.