CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 9Fish Ecology and Management StudiesMarine and fisheries researchFish Biology and Ecology Studies

Ecology of Juvenile Salmon in Shallow Tidal Freshwater Habitats in the Vicinity of the Sandy River Delta, Lower Columbia River, 2008

Open access
Sather, Nichole K., Johnson, Gary E., Storch, Adam, Teel, David, Skalski, John R., Jones, Tucker A., Dawley, Earl M., Zimmerman, Shon A. +3 more·2009
DOI 10.2172/962847
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The tidal freshwater monitoring (TFM) project reported herein is part of the research, monitoring, and evaluation effort developed by the Action Agencies (Bonneville Power Administration, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers [USACE], and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation) in response to obligations arising from the Endangered Species Act (ESA) as a result of operation of the Federal Columbia River Power System. The project is being performed under the auspices of the Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program (Project No. 2005-001-00). The research is a collaborative effort among the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, the National Marine Fisheries Service, and the University of Washington.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2172/962847

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sites further upriver are likely to have a different stock component utilizing shallow-water habitat in those areas.

    “Sites further upriver are likely to have a different stock component utilizing shallowwater habitat in those areas (Sather et al. 2009;Teel et al. 2009).”

    From Distribution, Size, and Origin of Juvenile Chinook Salmon in Shallow-Water Habitats of the Lower Columbia River and Estuary, 2002–2007 (2012) · cites this paper as Sather et al. 2009

    Section 5.4 (Genetics; page not available) reports different predominant juvenile Chinook stock groups in lower-estuary nearshore habitats and the Sandy River delta, supporting a difference between locations along the river. It does not establish that sites farther upriver than the study area are likely to have a different stock component in their shallow-water habitats. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • More than half of the unmarked juveniles observed by Sather et al. (2009) were stocks from the interior Columbia River basin, a much greater proportion than observed at our shallow-water sites.

    “However, more than half of the unmarked juveniles observed by Sather et al. (2009) were stocks from the interior Columbia River basin, a much greater proportion than we observed at our shallow-water sites.”

    From Distribution, Size, and Origin of Juvenile Chinook Salmon in Shallow-Water Habitats of the Lower Columbia River and Estuary, 2002–2007 (2012) · cites this paper as Sather et al. (2009)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Benda, L, NL Poff, D Miller, T Dunne, G Reeves, G Pess, and M Pollock. 2004. The Network Dynamics Hypothesis: How Channel Networks Structure Riverine Habitats. BioScience 54(5): 413-426.
  2. Eds. Peckarsky, BL, PA Fraissinet, MA Penton, and DJ Conklin, Jr. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.
  3. Buijse, AD and RP Houthuijzen. 1992. Piscivory, growth and size-selective mortality of age 0 pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49:894-902.
  4. Gerking, SD. 1994. Feeding Ecology of Fish. Academic Press, San Diego. 416 pp.
  5. Hasegawa, K and K Maekawa. 2006. The effects of introduced salmonids on two native stream-dwelling salmonids through interspecific competition. Journal of Fish Biology 68:1123-1132.
  6. Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP). 2006. Final Review of Proposals Submitted for Fiscal Years 2007-2009. ISRP 2006-6, Northwest Power and Conservation Council, Portland, Oregon.
  7. Kim, GW and DR DeVries. 2001. Adult fish predation on freshwater limnetic fish larvae: a mesocosm experiment. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 130:189-203.
  8. Kukulka, T and D Jay. 2003. Impacts of Columbia River discharge on salmonid habitat: 1. A nonstationary fluvial tidal model. Journal of Geophysical Research 108:9-1 to 9-20.
  9. Lott, MA. 2004. Habitat-specific feeding ecology of ocean-type juvenile Chinook salmon in the lower Columbia River estuary. M.S. Thesis, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. 110 pp.
  10. Marsh, PC and ME Douglas. 1997. Predation by introduced fishes on endangered humpback chub and other native species in the Little Colorado River, Arizona. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 126:343-346.
  11. McIntosh, AR, TA Crowl, and CR Townsend. 1994. Size-related impacts of introduced brown trout of the distribution of native common river galaxias. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 28:135-144.
  12. Meehan, WR and RA Miller. 1978. Stomach flushing: Effectiveness and influence on survival and condition of juvenile salmonids. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 35:1359-1363.
  13. Miller, BA and S. Sadro. 2003. Residence time and seasonal movements of juvenile Coho salmon in the ecotone and lower estuary of Winchester Creek, South Slough, Oregon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 132:546-559.
  14. Milner, G. B., D. J. Teel, F. M. Utter, and G. A. Winans. 1985. A genetic method of stock identification in mixed populations of Pacific salmon, Oncorhynchus spp. Marine Fisheries Review 47:1-8.
  15. Moran, P and J Baker. 2002. Polymerase Chain Reaction Inhibition in Historical Fish Scale Mounting Cards. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 131:109-119.
  16. Myers, J. M., R. G. Kope, G. J. Bryant, D. Teel, L. J. Lierheimer, T. C. Wainwright, W. S. Grant, F. W. Waknitz, K. Neely, S. T. Lindley, and R. S. Waples. 1998. Status review of Chinook salmon from Washington, Idaho, Oregon, and California.
  17. Narum, SR, JJ Stephenson, and MR Campbell. 2007. Genetic Variation and Structure of Chinook Salmon Life History Types in the Snake River. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 136:1253-1262.
  18. Sandercock, FK 1991. Life History of Coho Salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). In Pacific Salmon Life Histories. Eds. C Groot and L Margolis, University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, BC. pp. 397-445.
  19. SAS Institute. 2005. SAS/STAT User's Manual, release 9.0 edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.
  20. Schwarz, WL, GP Malanson, and FH Weirich. 1996. Effect of landscape position on the sediment chemistry of abandoned-channel wetlands. 1996. Landscape Ecology 11(1): 27-38
  21. Teel, DJ, C Baker, DR Kuligowski, TA Friesen, and B Shields. 2009. Genetic Stock Composition of Subyearling Chinook Salmon in Seasonal Floodplain Wetlands of the Lower Willamette River. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 138:211-217.
  22. Thom RM, R Zeigler, and AB Borde. 2002. Floristic Development Patterns in a Restored Elk River Estuarine March, Grays Harbor, Washington. Restoration Ecology 10(3): 487-496.
  23. Vincent, VG and WF Font. 2003. Host specificity and population structure of two exotic helminthes Camallanus cotti (Nematoda) and Bothriocephalus acheilognathi (Cestoda), parasitizing exotic fishes in Waianu Stream, O'Ahu Hawaii. Journal of Parisitology 89:540 -544.
  24. Waknitz, F.W., G.M. Mathews, T. Wainwright, and G.A. Winans. 1995. Status review for Mid-Columbia River summer chinook salmon. NOAA Tech. Mem. NMFS-NWFSC-22, 80 p. (Available from Natl. Mar. Fish. Serv., Northwest Fisheries Science Center, Coastal Zone and Estuarine Studies Division, 2725
  25. Wydoski, RS and RR Whitney. 2003. Inland Fishes of Washington, second edition. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington.
  26. Zambrana, L, E Martinez-Meyer, N Menezes, and AT Peterson. 2006. Invasive potential of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) and Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in American freshwater systems. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63:1903-1910.
  27. A.1 References Independent Scientific Advisory Board and Independent Scientific Review Panel. 2004. Draft Research, Monitoring & Evaluation Plan for the NOAA-Fisheries 2000 Federal Columbia River Power System Biological Opinion. Portland, Oregon.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sather, N. K., Johnson, G. E., Storch, A., Teel, D., Skalski, J. R., Jones, T. A., Dawley, E. M., Zimmerman, S. A., Borde, A. B., Mallette, C., & Farr, R.
Affiliations
  • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US)
  • Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (US)
  • NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
ORCID
Publisher
Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)
Published
2009-05-29
DOI
10.2172/962847
OpenAlex
W4206394869
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Washington
  • California Department of Fish and Wildlife
  • Bureau of Reclamation
  • U.S. Forest Service
  • Bonneville Power Administration
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
  • National Marine Fisheries Service
  • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
Keywords
juvenile salmon, Lower Columbia River, salmon ecology, threatened species, Federal Columbia River Power System

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review