The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Techno-Economic Analysis of Biofuels Production Based on Gasification
Open accessAbstract
This study compares capital and production costs of two biomass-to-liquid production plants based on gasification. The first biorefinery scenario is an oxygen-fed, low-temperature (870?C), non-slagging, fluidized bed gasifier. The second scenario is an oxygen-fed, high-temperature (1,300?C), slagging, entrained flow gasifier. Both are followed by catalytic Fischer-Tropsch synthesis and hydroprocessing to naphtha-range (gasoline blend stock) and distillate-range (diesel blend stock) liquid fractions. Process modeling software (Aspen Plus) is utilized to organize the mass and energy streams and cost estimation software is used to generate equipment costs. Economic analysis is performed to estimate the capital investment and operating costs. Results show that the total capital investment required for nth plant scenarios is $610 million and $500 million for high-temperature and low-temperature scenarios, respectively. Product value (PV) for the high-temperature and low-temperature scenarios is estimated to be $4.30 and $4.80 per gallon of gasoline equivalent (GGE), respectively, based on a feedstock cost of $75 per dry short ton. Sensitivity analysis is also performed on process and economic parameters. This analysis shows that total capital investment and feedstock cost are among the most influential parameters affecting the PV.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Techno-economic analysis of biomass fast pyrolysis to transportation fuels
Wright, M. M., Daugaard, D. E., Satrio, J. A., & Brown, R. C. (2010) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2010.07.029 · Cited by 814
Self-citationGasification of biomass: comparison of fixed bed and fluidized bed gasifier
Warnecke, R. (2000) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/s0961-9534(00)00009-x · Cited by 398
Cited by
Biomass-to-bioenergy and biofuel supply chain optimization: Overview, key issues and challenges
Yue, D., You, F., & Snyder, S. W. (2014) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2013.11.016 · Cited by 720
Bio-jet fuel conversion technologies
Wang, W.-C., & Tao, L. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.016 · Cited by 564
Bond, J. Q., Upadhye, A. A., Olcay, H., Tompsett, G. A., Jae, J., Xing, R., Alonso, D. M., Wang, D., Zhang, T., Kumar, R., et al. (2014) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c3ee43846e · Cited by 403
Kargbo, H., Harris, J. S., & Phan, A. N. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110168 · Cited by 333
Aviation CO2 emissions reductions from the use of alternative jet fuels
Staples, M. D., Malina, R., Suresh, P., Hileman, J. I., & Barrett, S. R. H. (2018) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.007 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Swanson, R. M., Platon, A., Satrio, J. A., Brown, R. C., & Hsu, D. D.
- Published
- 2010-11-01
- OpenAlex
- W1522031829
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 2
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Techno-Economic Analysis of Biofuels Production Based on Gasification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2172/994017
- The paper
- Swanson, R. M., Platon, A., Satrio, J. A., Brown, R. C., & Hsu, D. D. (2010). Techno-Economic Analysis of Biofuels Production Based on Gasification. https://doi.org/10.2172/994017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.