The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Virtual Screening and Its Integration with Modern Drug Design Technologies
Abstract
Drug discovery is a highly complex and costly process, which demands integrated efforts in several relevant aspects involving innovation, knowledge, information, technologies, expertise, R&D investments and management skills. The shift from traditional to genomics- and proteomics-based drug research has fundamentally transformed key R&D strategies in the pharmaceutical industry addressed to the design of new chemical entities as drug candidates against a variety of biological targets. Therefore, drug discovery has moved toward more rational strategies based on our increasing understanding of the fundamental principles of protein-ligand interactions. The combination of available knowledge of several 3D protein structures with hundreds of thousands of small-molecules have attracted the attention of scientists from all over the world for the application of structure- and ligand-based drug design approaches. In this context, virtual screening technologies have largely enhanced the impact of computational methods applied to chemistry and biology and the goal of applying such methods is to reduce large compound databases and to select a limited number of promising candidates for drug design. This review provides a perspective of the utility of virtual screening in drug design and its integration with other important drug discovery technologies such as high-throughput screening (HTS) and QSAR, highlighting the present challenges, limitations, and future perspectives in medicinal chemistry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recognizing Pitfalls in Virtual Screening: A Critical Review
Scior, T., Bender, A., Tresadern, G., Medina-Franco, J. L., Martínez-Mayorga, K., Langer, T., Cuanalo-Contreras, K., & Agrafiotis, D. K. (2012) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci200528d · Cited by 438
Improving scoring-docking-screening powers of protein-ligand scoring functions using random forest
Wang, C., & Zhang, Y. (2017) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.24667 · Cited by 334
Zhu, T., Cao, S., Su, P.-C., Patel, R., Shah, D., Chokshi, H. B., Szukala, R., Johnson, M. E., & Hevener, K. E. (2013) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm301916b · Cited by 313
Molecular Docking: Principles, Advances, and Its Applications in Drug Discovery
Muhammed, M. T., & Aki-Yalcin, E. (2024) · Letters in Drug Design & Discovery · doi:10.2174/1570180819666220922103109 · Cited by 267
Smith, A. J. T., Zhang, X., Leach, A. G., & Houk, K. N. (2009) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm800498e · Cited by 193
Metadata
- Authors
- Andricopulo, A., Guido, R., & Oliva, G.
- Venue
- Current Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2008-01-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-46
- ISSN
- 0929-8673 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2144728687
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Virtual Screening and Its Integration with Modern Drug Design Technologies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2174/092986708783330683
- The paper
- Andricopulo, A., Guido, R., & Oliva, G. (2008). Virtual Screening and Its Integration with Modern Drug Design Technologies. Current Medicinal Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986708783330683
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.