The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent Trends in Targeted Anticancer Prodrug and Conjugate Design
Open accessAbstract
Anticancer drugs are often nonselective antiproliferative agents (cytotoxins) that preferentially kill dividing cells by attacking their DNA at some level. The lack of selectivity results in significant toxicity to noncancerous proliferating cells. These toxicities along with drug resistance exhibited by the solid tumors are major therapy limiting factors that result into poor prognosis for patients. Prodrug and conjugate design involves the synthesis of inactive drug derivatives that are converted to an active form inside the body and preferably at the site of action. Classical prodrug and conjugate design have focused on the development of prodrugs that can overcome physicochemical (e.g., solubility, chemical instability) or biopharmaceutical problems (e.g., bioavailability, toxicity) associated with common anticancer drugs. The recent targeted prodrug and conjugate design, on the other hand, hinge on the selective delivery of anticancer agents to tumor tissues thereby avoiding their cytotoxic effects on noncancerous cells. Targeting strategies have attempted to take advantage of low extracellular pH, elevated enzymes in tumor tissues, the hypoxic environment inside the tumor core, and tumor-specific antigens expressed on tumor cell surfaces. The present review highlights recent trends in prodrug and conjugate rationale and design for cancer treatment. The various approaches that are currently being explored are critically analyzed and a comparative account of the advantages and disadvantages associated with each approach is presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multidrug resistance in cancer: role of ATP–dependent transporters
Gottesman, M. M., Fojo, T., & Bates, S. E. (2002) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc706 · Cited by 5,536
Exploiting tumour hypoxia in cancer treatment
Brown, J. M., & Wilson, W. R. (2004) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1367 · Cited by 2,828
Maeda, H. (2001) · Advances in Enzyme Regulation · doi:10.1016/s0065-2571(00)00013-3 · Cited by 2,495
The common biology of cancer and ageing
Finkel, T., Serrano, M., & Blasco, M. A. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05985 · Cited by 988
Tolcher, A. W., Ochoa, L., Hammond, L. A., Patnaik, A., Edwards, T., Takimoto, C., Smith, L., de Bono, J., Schwartz, G., Mays, T., et al. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2003.05.137 · Cited by 206
Yu, H., Cook, T. J., & Sinko, P. J. (1997) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1023/a:1012150405949 · Cited by 133
Self-citation
Cited by
Pharmaceutical nanotechnology for oral delivery of anticancer drugs
Mei, L., Zhang, Z., Zhao, L., Huang, L., Yang, X.-L., Tang, J., & Feng, S.-S. (2013) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.11.005 · Cited by 373
Singh, R. K., Kumar, S., Prasad, D. N., & Bhardwaj, T. R. (2018) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.04.001 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Singh, Y., Palombo, M., & Sinko, P.
- Venue
- Current Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2008-08-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 1802-1826
- ISSN
- 0929-8673 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2131216411
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 7.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent Trends in Targeted Anticancer Prodrug and Conjugate Design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2174/092986708785132997
- The paper
- Singh, Y., Palombo, M., & Sinko, P. (2008). Recent Trends in Targeted Anticancer Prodrug and Conjugate Design. Current Medicinal Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986708785132997
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.