Cited by 70Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryAdvanced Drug Delivery SystemsAdvancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery

Current trends in the application of nanoparticles in drug delivery

Malam, Y., J. Lim, E., M. Seifalian, A.·2011·Current Medicinal Chemistry

Abstract

The discovery of new biologically active compounds that can be exploited therapeutically to treat disease has stalled, with fewer new drugs entering the market every year. The spotlight has now turned onto nanoparticles (NPs) as a versatile and multifaceted platform for the delivery of drugs. NPs offer better pharmacokinetic properties, controlled and sustained release, and targeting of specific cells, tissues or organs. All these features can improve the efficacy of existing drugs. The use of NPs can dramatically impact the treatment of many diseases. Many potential therapeutics that exist for alleviating brain diseases such as epilepsy, Alzheimer's disease and tumours are not feasible due to a lack of means to deliver drugs across the blood brain barrier. NPs offer an alternative solution, since they can be modified to cross the blood brain barrier. Additionally, NPs can also play a part in alternative methods of non-parental administration of drugs e.g. pulmonary and transdermally. Through active targeting and the enhanced permeation and retention effect, NPs reduce the systemic toxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs by ensuring delivery only to the site of the tumour, thus enhancing cancer treatment. We critically review the literature to provide a summary of current synthesis methodologies and applications of NPs in drug delivery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/092986711794940860

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PEGylation is most commonly used strategy to reduce opsonization and minimize clearance by RES, may be applicable for non-viral vectors-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 delivery.

    “PEGylation, the most commonly used strategy to reduce the opsonization and minimize the clearance by RES, may also be applicable for non-viral vectors-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 delivery [144, 145].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malam, Y., J. Lim, E., & M. Seifalian, A.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Venue
Current Medicinal Chemistry
Published
2011-03-01
Volume
18
Issue
7
Pages
1067-1078
ISSN
0929-8673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2158063443
Cited by
70
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 15
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Medicinal Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
Keywords
nanoparticles, drug delivery, blood-brain barrier, targeted drug delivery, enhanced permeability and retention effect, controlled release, nanoparticle synthesis, pulmonary drug delivery, transdermal drug delivery, cancer chemotherapy, Alzheimer's disease, epilepsy, tumor targeting
MeSH terms
Disease, Humans, Drug Delivery Systems, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review