The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis with a Leukocytapheresis Column
Abstract
The administration of steroids is not always effective for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Their long-term use often causes adverse effects which sometimes result in their stoppage and acute exacerbation. Therefore, an alternative treatment is necessary in order to decrease steroid dosage and avoid the clinical problems associated with steroids. Methods The effectiveness and adverse effects of a leukocytapheresis (LCAP) were investigated in a controlled multicenter trial with randomized assignment of 76 active-stage UC patients in two groups. In the LCAP group (39 patients), LCAP weekly for 5 weeks as an intensive therapy was added to the on-going drug therapy, while steroids were maintained but not increased, and then LCAP was gradually reduced to once every 4 weeks as a maintenance therapy. In the high dose prednisolone (h-PSL) group (37 patients), PSL was added or increased 30 approximately 40 mg/day for moderately severe and 60 approximately 80 mg/day for severe patients and then gradually tapered. Findings The LCAP group showed a significantly higher effectiveness (74% vs. 38%; p=0.005) and lower incidence of adverse effects (24% vs. 68%; p<0.001). The patients were able to continue the trial for a longer period in the LCAP group than the h-PSL group (p=0.012). Clinical activity and endoscopic indexes showed the LCAP group had better improvements than the h-PSL group. Interpretation The results of the trial show that LCAP permits a reduction in total PSL dosage and is more effective and safer than high-dose PSL administration for intensive therapy, and LCAP may maintain remission longer than PSL.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Inflammatory bowel disease: clinical aspects and established and evolving therapies
Baumgart, D. C., & Sandborn, W. J. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60751-x · Cited by 1,920
Dignass, A., Lindsay, J. O., Sturm, A., Windsor, A., Colombel, J.-F., Allez, M., D'Haens, G., D'Hoore, A., Mantzaris, G., Novacek, G., et al. (2012) · Journal of Crohn's and Colitis · doi:10.1016/j.crohns.2012.09.002 · Cited by 1,548
Stange, E. F., Travis, S. P. L., Vermeire, S., Reinisch, W., Geboes, K., Barakauskiene, A., Feakins, R., Fléjou, J. F., Herfarth, H., Hommes, D. W., et al. (2008) · Journal of Crohn's and Colitis · doi:10.1016/j.crohns.2007.11.001 · Cited by 555
Szczepiorkowski, Z. M., Winters, J. L., Bandarenko, N., Kim, H. C., Linenberger, M. L., Marques, M. B., Sarode, R., Schwartz, J., Weinstein, R., & Shaz, B. H. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Apheresis · doi:10.1002/jca.20240 · Cited by 508
Metadata
- Authors
- Sawada, K., Muto, T., Shimoyama, T., Satomi, M., Sawada, T., Nagawa, H., Hiwatashi, N., Asakura, H., & Hibi, T.
- Venue
- Current Pharmaceutical Design
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2003-02-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 307-321
- ISSN
- 1381-6128 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2108587285
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis with a Leukocytapheresis Column. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2174/1381612033391928
- The paper
- Sawada, K., Muto, T., Shimoyama, T., Satomi, M., Sawada, T., Nagawa, H., Hiwatashi, N., Asakura, H., & Hibi, T. (2003). Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis with a Leukocytapheresis Column. Current Pharmaceutical Design. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612033391928
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.