Cited by 24Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTreatment of Major DepressionMental Health Treatment and Access

Room for improvement in the pharmacological treatment of anxiety disorders.

Baldwin, D.·2008·Current Pharmaceutical Design

Abstract

Anxiety disorders are common in community settings and in primary and secondary medical care. The associated societal burden is considerable, but many of those who might benefit from pharmacological or psychological treatment are not recognised or treated. By contrast, some patients receive unnecessary or inappropriate interventions. Recent evidence-based guidelines for pharmacological management of patients with anxiety disorders recommend initial treatment with either a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. However, there is considerable room for improvement in both the efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological treatment. For example, response rates to initial treatment can be disappointing and it is still not possible to predict reliably which patients will respond well and which will show only a limited response to treatment. Furthermore, many patients fear or experience unwanted and distressing adverse effects and this limits the effectiveness of pharmacological treatments in clinical practice. Because of the relative lack of longitudinal studies of clinical outcomes in anxiety disorders and the small number of placebo-controlled relapse prevention studies, the optimal duration of treatment after a satisfactory response to acute treatment is still uncertain. There have been comparatively few studies of the further management of patients who do not respond to initial treatment and there is a clear need for further randomised controlled trials of augmentation treatment, in patients who do not respond to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor or other initial pharmacological approaches. Future treatment guidelines will be influenced by emerging data with both established and novel pharmacological interventions and through better identification of patient sub-groups that are likely to respond preferentially to particular interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/138161208786848810

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baldwin, D.
Affiliations
Royal South Hants Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Baldwin, D.
Venue
Current Pharmaceutical Design
Published
2008-11-01
Volume
14
Issue
33
Pages
3482-3491
ISSN
1381-6128 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053657613
Cited by
24
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Pharmaceutical Design (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
anxiety disorders, pharmacotherapy, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, treatment response, treatment tolerability, adverse drug reactions, relapse prevention, treatment guidelines, patient subgroups
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review