The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Design of Ester Prodrugs to Enhance Oral Absorption of Poorly Permeable Compounds: Challenges to the Discovery Scientist
Abstract
Many drugs are administered at sites that are remote from their site of action. The most common route of drug delivery is the oral route. The optimal physicochemical properties to allow high transcellular absorption following oral administration are well established and include a limit on molecular size, hydrogen bonding potential and adequate lipophilicity. For many drug targets, synthetic strategies can be devised to balance the physicochemical properties required for high transcellular absorption and the SAR for the drug target. However, there are drug targets where the SAR requires properties at odds with good membrane permeability. These include a requirement for significant polarity and groups that exhibit high hydrogen bonding potential such as carboxylic acids and alcohols. In such cases, prodrug strategies have been employed. The rationale behind the prodrug strategy is to introduce lipophilicity and mask hydrogen bonding groups of an active compound by the addition of another moiety, most commonly an ester. An ideal ester prodrug should exhibit the following properties: 1). Weak (or no) activity against any pharmacological target, 2). Chemical stability across a pH range, 3). High aqueous solubility, 4). Good transcellular absorption, 5). Resistance to hydrolysis during the absorption phase, 6). Rapid and quantitative breakdown to yield high circulating concentrations of the active component post absorption. This paper will review the literature around marketed prodrugs and determine the most appropriate prodrug characteristics. In addition, it will examine potential Discovery approaches to optimising prodrug delivery and recommend a strategy for prosecuting an oral prodrug approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prodrugs: design and clinical applications
Rautio, J., Kumpulainen, H., Heimbach, T., Oliyai, R., Oh, D., Järvinen, T., & Savolainen, J. (2008) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2468 · Cited by 1,630
The evolution of commercial drug delivery technologies
Vargason, A. M., Anselmo, A. C., & Mitragotri, S. (2021) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-021-00698-w · Cited by 1,361
Carrier-mediated cellular uptake of pharmaceutical drugs: an exception or the rule?
Dobson, P. D., & Kell, D. B. (2008) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2438 · Cited by 475
Lessons Learned from Marketed and Investigational Prodrugs
Ettmayer, P., Amidon, G. L., Clement, B., & Testa, B. (2004) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0303812 · Cited by 384
Cheetham, A. G., Chakroun, R. W., Ma, W., & Cui, H. (2017) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c7cs00521k · Cited by 367
Metadata
- Authors
- Beaumont, K., Webster, R., Gardner, I., & Dack, K.
- Venue
- Current Drug Metabolism
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2003-12-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 461-485
- ISSN
- 1389-2002 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148756948
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Design of Ester Prodrugs to Enhance Oral Absorption of Poorly Permeable Compounds: Challenges to the Discovery Scientist. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2174/1389200033489253
- The paper
- Beaumont, K., Webster, R., Gardner, I., & Dack, K. (2003). Design of Ester Prodrugs to Enhance Oral Absorption of Poorly Permeable Compounds: Challenges to the Discovery Scientist. Current Drug Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389200033489253
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.