The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reactive Oxygen Species in Myocardial Reperfusion Injury: From Physiopathology to Therapeutic Approaches
Abstract
Myocardial ischemia is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the world. Although restoration of blood flow after prolonged ischemia is essential for cardiomyocytes salvation and to limit myocardial damage and cardiac dysfunction, reperfusion itself exacerbates myocardial injury. Considerable evidence attributes reactive oxygen species (ROS), produced either by the myocardium itself or by infiltrating inflammatory cells, as an early event in this process. Once produced, ROS can lead to cellular damage through a number of pathways including direct damage to membranes and proteins or indirect damage through the activation of pro-apoptotic pathways. While using antioxidants to scavenge free radicals or targeting the sources of ROS, such as xanthine oxidase, may be potential attractive approaches to reduce myocardial reperfusion injury, clinical trials using antioxidant therapies have been largely disappointing. Neither oxidant scavengers like N-acetylcysteine and vitamins E and C, nor xanthine oxidase inhibitor allopurinol have provided indisputable evidence of a clinical benefit despite numerous favourable studies in animal models. Evidence to support a role of ROS in myocardial injury reperfusion is strong, but the clinical approach used has so far been inadequate. Absence of optimal pharmacology, variation in end-points used and low specificity of the compounds used have often been pointed out. In addition, the efficacy of antioxidants is often evaluated based on indirect biomarkers, which are prone to variation. Thus, clinical trials could be improved by the standardisation of the methods to measure oxidative stress and their impact on prognosis outcome. Keywords: Antioxidants, ischemia reperfusion injury, myocardial infarction, oxidative stress, reactive oxygen species, therapeutic strategies, Myocardial ischemia, cardiomyocytes salvation, cardiac dysfunction, myocardial injury, xanthine oxidase, clinical trials using antioxidant therapies have, efficacy of antioxidants, prognosis outcome
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Role of ROS and RNS Sources in Physiological and Pathological Conditions
Di Meo, S., Reed, T. T., Venditti, P., & Victor, V. M. (2016) · Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity · doi:10.1155/2016/1245049 · Cited by 1,614
ROS and redox signaling in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury and cardioprotection
Cadenas, S. (2018) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.01.024 · Cited by 820
Kalogeris, T., Baines, C. P., Krenz, M., & Korthuis, R. J. (2016) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c160006 · Cited by 718
Atashi, F., Modarressi, A., & Pepper, M. S. (2015) · Stem Cells and Development · doi:10.1089/scd.2014.0484 · Cited by 603
New Insights on NOX Enzymes in the Central Nervous System
Nayernia, Z., Jaquet, V., & Krause, K.-H. (2014) · Antioxidants & Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2013.5703 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Braunersreuther, V., & Jaquet, V.
- Venue
- Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2012-01-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-114
- ISSN
- 1389-2010 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970684145
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reactive Oxygen Species in Myocardial Reperfusion Injury: From Physiopathology to Therapeutic Approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2174/138920112798868782
- The paper
- Braunersreuther, V., & Jaquet, V. (2012). Reactive Oxygen Species in Myocardial Reperfusion Injury: From Physiopathology to Therapeutic Approaches. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.2174/138920112798868782
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.