The DOI matches its Crossref record.
NMDA Receptors and Learning and Memory Processes
Abstract
In the first part of this review studies are considered in which pre- or post-training peripheral or intracerebroventricular administrations of competitive or noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists were carried out in a variety of animal species tested in different experimental conditions, in order to investigate the effects of these drugs on acquisition and memory processes. In particular, post-training treatments, which are known to affect memory consolidation, ruling out the possible "aspecific effects" linked to the pre-training administrations, show that the NMDA receptor antagonists impair memory in animals tested in various tasks. Memory impairments are also evident when the NMDA antagonists (in particular AP5) are injected into different brain structures, including amygdala and hippocampus. In a second part of this review some recent studies are considered showing the existence of: a) cholinergic-glutamatergic interactions; b) interactions between NMDA receptors and opioid system, and c) interactions between NMDA receptor antagonists (MK-801) and cocaine, in the modulation of memory processes of laboratory animals. The results of some studies showing the involvement of glutamatergic mechanisms in Alzheimer's disease are finally reported, and the therapeutic efficacy of glutamatergic drugs in the treatment of this disease is considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Farmer, J., Zhao, X., van Praag, H., Wodtke, K., Gage, F. H., & Christie, B. R. (2004) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2003.09.029 · Cited by 836
Effects of D-Cycloserine on Extinction: Translation From Preclinical to Clinical Work
Davis, M., Ressler, K., Rothbaum, B. O., & Richardson, R. (2006) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.03.084 · Cited by 498
Glutamatergic substrates of drug addiction and alcoholism
Gass, J. T., & Olive, M. F. (2008) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2007.06.039 · Cited by 484
Olivares, D., K. Deshpande, V., Shi, Y., K. Lahiri, D., H. Greig, N., T. Rogers, J., & Huang, X. (2012) · Current Alzheimer Research · doi:10.2174/156720512801322564 · Cited by 407
Intranasal Insulin Improves Memory in Humans: Superiority of Insulin Aspart
Benedict, C., Hallschmid, M., Schmitz, K., Schultes, B., Ratter, F., Fehm, H. L., Born, J., & Kern, W. (2007) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301193 · Cited by 302
Metadata
- Authors
- Castellano, C., Cestari, V., & Ciamei, A.
- Venue
- Current Drug Targets
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2001-09-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 273-283
- ISSN
- 1389-4501 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2108040927
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NMDA Receptors and Learning and Memory Processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2174/1389450013348515
- The paper
- Castellano, C., Cestari, V., & Ciamei, A. (2001). NMDA Receptors and Learning and Memory Processes. Current Drug Targets. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389450013348515
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.