Cited by 27Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

Selective Modulators of α5-Containing GABAA Receptors and their Therapeutic Significance

Soh, Ming, Lynch, Joseph·2015·Current Drug Targets

Abstract

GABAA receptors containing the α5 subunit (5GABAARs) are found mainly in the hippocampus where they mediate a tonic chloride leak current and contribute a slow component to GABAergic inhibitory synaptic currents. Their inhibitory effect on the excitability of hippocampal neurons at least partly explains why changes in the level of activity of 5GABAARs affect cognition, learning and memory. These receptors have been implicated as potential therapeutic targets for a range of clinical conditions including age-related dementia, stroke, schizophrenia, Down syndrome and anesthetic- induced amnesia. Accordingly, a range of pharmacological modulators that selectively target 5GABAARs, as either inhibitors or allosteric enhancers, have been developed. Although many of these compounds show therapeutic effects in animal models of the above clinical disorders, none has been marketed yet due to unsuccessful clinical trials and toxicity in humans. These experiments have also revealed paradoxical effects of 5GABAAR modulation (e.g., cognitive impairments can be reversed by both positive and negative modulation), suggesting that our knowledge of the physiological roles of 5GABAARs is incomplete. This review highlights the various positive and negative modulators for 5GABAARs that have been developed, key findings concerning their effects in behavioral studies, and their importance across a number of therapeutic fields. It also highlights some of the gaps in our knowledge of the physiological and pathological roles of α5GABAARs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/1389450116666150309120235

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • α5GABAARs have been implicated most consistently in memory, with knockdown, knockout, or pharmacological suppression of α5GABAARs leading to improvements in learning and memory.

    “α5GABAARs, which are expressed most intensively in the hippocampus and deep layers of cortex, have been implicated most consistently in memory, with knockdown, knockout, or pharmacological suppression of α5GABAARs leading to improvements in learning and memory [56-61].”

    From An emerging circuit pharmacology of GABAA receptors (2018) · cites this paper as [61]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soh, M., & Lynch, J.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Venue
Current Drug Targets
Published
2015-07-27
Volume
16
Issue
7
Pages
735-746
ISSN
1389-4501 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2012872188
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Drug Targets (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
alpha5 GABA-A receptor, GABA-A receptor modulators, allosteric enhancers, positive modulators, hippocampus, tonic inhibition, cognitive impairment, age-related dementia, schizophrenia, Down syndrome, stroke, paradoxical effects, drug toxicity
MeSH terms
Amnesia, Animals, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Receptors, GABA-A, GABA Modulators, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review