Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

To Die or Not to Die: That is the Autophagic Question

Maiuri, Maria, Galluzzi, Lorenzo, Vicencio, Jose, Kepp, Oliver, Tasdemir, Ezgi, Kroemer, Guido·2008·Current Molecular Medicine

Abstract

Macroautophagy (commonly referred to as autophagy) is the process by which intact organelles and/or large portions of the cytoplasm are engulfed within double-membraned autophagic vacuoles for degradation. Whereas basal levels of autophagy ensure the physiological turnover of old and damaged organelles, the massive accumulation of autophagic vacuoles may represent either an alternative pathway of cell death or an ultimate attempt for cells to survive by adapting to stress. The activation of the autophagic pathway beyond a certain threshold may promote cell death directly, by causing the collapse of cellular functions as a result of cellular atrophy (autophagic, or type II, cell death). Alternatively, autophagy can lead to the execution of apoptotic (type I) or necrotic (type III) cell death programs, presumably via common regulators such as proteins from the Bcl-2 family. On the other hand, limited self-eating can provide cells with metabolic substrates to meet their energetic demands under stressful conditions, such as nutrient deprivation, or favor the selective elimination of damaged (and potentially dangerous) organelles. In these instances, autophagy operates as a pro-survival mechanism. The coordinate regulation of these opposite effects of autophagy relies upon a complex network of signal transducers, most of which also participate in non-autophagic signaling cascades. Thus, autophagy occupies a crucial position within the cell's metabolism, and its modulation may represent an alternative therapeutic strategy in several pathological settings including cancer and neurodegeneration. Here, we present a general outline of autophagy followed by a detailed analysis of organelle-specific autophagic pathways and of their intimate connections with cell death.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/156652408783769616

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 267

Metadata

Authors
Maiuri, M., Galluzzi, L., Vicencio, J., Kepp, O., Tasdemir, E., & Kroemer, G.
Venue
Current Molecular Medicine
Published
2008-03-01
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
78-91
ISSN
1566-5240 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155414543
Cited by
267
References
2
FWCI
16.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: To Die or Not to Die: That is the Autophagic Question. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2174/156652408783769616
The paper
Maiuri, M., Galluzzi, L., Vicencio, J., Kepp, O., Tasdemir, E., & Kroemer, G. (2008). To Die or Not to Die: That is the Autophagic Question. Current Molecular Medicine. https://doi.org/10.2174/156652408783769616

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.