The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Memantine Treatment in Patients with Mild to Moderate Alzheimers Disease Already Receiving a Cholinesterase Inhibitor: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of memantine in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) receiving cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI) treatment. METHODS: Participants (N= 433) with probable AD, Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) scores between 10-22 (inclusive), and concurrent stable use of ChEIs (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) were randomized to placebo or memantine (20 mg once daily) for 24 weeks. Primary outcomes were changes from baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) and on Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change Plus Caregiver Input (CIBIC-Plus) score. Secondary measures comprised the 23-item Alzheimer Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADCS-ADL(23)), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), and MMSE. RESULTS: At the end of the trial, there were no statistically significant differences between the memantine- and placebo group on primary and secondary outcome measures. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar between the two groups, with no AE occurring in more than 5% of memantine-treated patients and at a rate twice that of the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, memantine did not show an advantage over placebo based on protocol-specified primary or secondary analyses in patients with mild to moderate AD on stable ChEI regimens. There were no significant differences in tolerability and safety between the memantine- and placebo groups.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Short-term (6-12 months) RCTs (level I evidence), longer-term (12-36 months) openlabel extensions of RCTs (level II or III evidence), and long-term (2 to 5-plus years) observational prospective clinical cohort effectiveness studies (level II evidence) support the safety and benefits of anti-AD treatments in combination, most frequently as memantine added on to a stable regimen of background ChEI”
From The Alzheimer’s Disease Clinical Spectrum (2019) · cites this paper as [121]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer's disease
Lyketsos, C. G., Carrillo, M. C., Ryan, J. M., Khachaturian, A. S., Trzepacz, P., Amatniek, J., Cedarbaum, J., Brashear, R., & Miller, D. S. (2011) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.05.2410 · Cited by 1,139
Donepezil and memantine for moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease
Howard, R., McShane, R., Lindesay, J., Ritchie, C., Baldwin, A., Barber, R., Burns, A., Dening, T., Findlay, D., Holmes, C., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1106668 · Cited by 782
Therapeutics of Alzheimer's disease: Past, present and future
Anand, R., Gill, K. D., & Mahdi, A. A. (2013) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.07.004 · Cited by 765
“A number of investigators have looked at the possible advantage of its combining memantine with AChEI in AD (Atri et al., 2013; Dantoine et al., 2006; Howard et al., 2012; Lopez et al., 2009; Porsteinsson et al., 2008; Riepe et al., 2007; Tariot et al., 2004).”
BackgroundChen, Z., & Zhong, C. (2013) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.06.004 · Cited by 698
“The short-term efficacy of complement of memantine to ChEIs treatment has been evaluated in some randomized controlled trials (Beier, 2004; Porsteinsson et al., 2008), one of them showed significant benefits of adding memantine verse placebo; but another trial failed.”
BackgroundInfluentialDysken, M. W., Sano, M., Asthana, S., Vertrees, J. E., Pallaki, M., Llorente, M., Love, S., Schellenberg, G. D., McCarten, J. R., Malphurs, J., et al. (2014) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2013.282834 · Cited by 628
Metadata
- Authors
- Porsteinsson, A., Grossberg, G., Mintzer, J., & Olin, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Rochester Medicine (US)
- Venue
- Current Alzheimer Research
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2008-02-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83-89
- ISSN
- 1567-2050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2149626554
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 17.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Alzheimer Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Keywords
- memantine, Alzheimer's disease, cholinesterase inhibitors, donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine, combination therapy, cognitive function, activities of daily living, neuropsychiatric symptoms, drug safety, tolerability
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Cholinesterase Inhibitors, Double-Blind Method, Drug Therapy, Combination, Humans, Memantine, Mental Status Schedule, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Prospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Treatment Outcome, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review