The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Does Religiosity Protect Against Cognitive and Behavioral Decline in Alzheimers Dementia?
Abstract
BACKGROUND: several studies have shown that religiosity has beneficial effects on health, mortality and pathological conditions; little is known about religiosity in Alzheimer's disease and the progression of its cognitive, behavioral and functional symptoms. Our aim was to identify any relationship between religiosity and the progression of cognitive impairment and behavioral disorders in mild-moderate Alzheimer's disease, and any relationship between the patient's religiosity and the stress in caregivers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 64 patients with Alzheimer's disease were analyzed at baseline and 12 months later using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Behavioral Religiosity Scale (BRS) and the Francis Short Scale (FSS). Caregivers were also questioned on the patient's functional abilities (ADL, IADL), the behavioral disturbances (NPI), and on their stress (NPI-D, CBI). Patients were divided into 2 groups according to BRS: a score of <24 meant no or low religiosity (LR), while a score of > or =24 meant moderate or high religiosity (HR). FINDINGS: LR patients had worsened more markedly after 12 months in their total cognitive and behavioral test scores. Stress was also significantly higher in the caregivers of the LR group. Global BRS and FSS scores correlated significantly with variations after 1 year in the MMSE (r: 0.50), NPI (r:-0.51), NPI-D (r:-0.55) and CBI (r:-0.62). A low religiosity coincided with a higher risk of cognitive impairment, considered as a 3-point decrease in MMSE score (OR 6.7, CI: 1.8-24.7). INTERPRETATION: higher levels of religiosity in Alzheimer's dementia seem to correlate with a slower cognitive and behavioral decline, with a corresponding significant reduction of the caregiver's burden.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Of the 14 studies with the highest quality ratings, eight (57%) reported positive relationships [423–430] and three (21%) reported negative relationships with cognitive function [431–433].”
From Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications (2012) · cites this paper as [426]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications
Koenig, H. G. (2012) · ISRN Psychiatry · doi:10.5402/2012/278730 · Cited by 2,423
“More recent research supports a positive link between R/S and better cognitive function in both dementia and in old age [434, 435].”
BackgroundHandbook of Religion and Health
Koenig, H. G., VanderWeele, T. J., & Peteet, J. R. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190088859.001.0001 · Cited by 1,160
Mental disorders, religion and spirituality 1990 to 2010: a systematic evidence-based review
Bonelli, R. M., & Koenig, H. G. (2013) · Journal of Religion and Health · doi:10.1007/s10943-013-9691-4 · Cited by 516
“Both papers were included in our review (Kaufman et al. 2007; Coin et al. 2010).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSpirituality and religion in older adults with dementia: a systematic review
Agli, O., Bailly, N., & Ferrand, C. (2014) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1017/s1041610214001665 · Cited by 189
The Six Dimensions of Wellness and Cognition in Aging Adults
Strout, K. A., & Howard, E. (2012) · Journal of Holistic Nursing · doi:10.1177/0898010112440883 · Cited by 96
“Coin et al. (2010) examined the relationship between religiosity and the development of cognitive impairment in adults with mild-to-moderate AD.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Coin, A., Perissinotto, E., Najjar, M., Girardi, A., Inelmen, E. M., Enzi, G., Manzato, E., & Sergi, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Padua (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Perissinotto, E.
- Enzi, G.
- Manzato, E.
- Sergi, G.
- Venue
- Current Alzheimer Research
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2010-08-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 445-452
- ISSN
- 1567-2050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2123101179
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Alzheimer Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Keywords
- religiosity, Alzheimer's disease, cognitive decline, behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, caregiver stress, caregiver burden, functional decline
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Mental Disorders, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Religion, Religion and Psychology, Caregivers, Disease Progression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review