Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 230

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Strategies for Absorption Screening in Drug Discovery and Development

Hilde Bohets, Pieter Annaert, Geert Mannens, Ludy van Beijsterveldt, Katelijne Anciaux, Peter Verboven, Willem Meuldermans, Karel Lavrijsen·2001·Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry

Abstract

This review gives an overview of the current approaches to evaluate drug absorption potential in the different phases of drug discovery and development. Methods discussed include in silico models, artificial membranes as absorption models, in vitro models such as the Ussing chamber and Caco-2 monolayers, in situ rat intestinal perfusion and in vivo absorption studies. In silico models such as iDEA can help optimizing chemical synthesis since the fraction absorbed (Fa) can be predicted based on structural characteristics only. A more accurate prediction of Fa can be obtained by feeding the iDEA model with Caco-2 permeability data and solubility data at various pH's. Permeability experiments with artificial membranes such as the filter-IAM technology are high-throughput and offer the possibility to group compounds according to a low and a high permeability. Highly permeable compounds, however, need to be further evaluated in Caco-2 cells, since artificial membranes lack active transport systems and efflux mechanisms such as P-glycoprotein (PgP). Caco-2 and other "intestinal-like" cell lines (MDCK, TC-7, HT29-MTX, 2/4/A1) permit to perform mechanistic studies and identify drug-drug interactions at the level of PgP. The everted sac and Ussing chamber techniques are more advanced models in the sense that they can provide additional information with respect to intestinal metabolism. In situ rat intestinal perfusion is a reliable technique to investigate drug absorption potential in combination with intestinal metabolism, however, it is time consuming, and therefore not suited for screening purposes. Finally, in vivo absorption in animals can be estimated from bioavailability studies (ratio of the plasma AUC after oral and i.v. administration). The role of the liver in affecting bioavailability can be evaluated by portal vein sampling experiments in dogs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/1568026013394886

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 230

Metadata

Authors
Bohets, H., Annaert, P., Mannens, G., van Beijsterveldt, L., Anciaux, K., Verboven, P., Meuldermans, W., & Lavrijsen, K.
Venue
Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry
Published
2001-11-01
Volume
1
Issue
5
Pages
367-383
ISSN
1568-0266 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1540610589
Cited by
230
References
3
FWCI
5.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategies for Absorption Screening in Drug Discovery and Development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2174/1568026013394886
The paper
Bohets, H., Annaert, P., Mannens, G., van Beijsterveldt, L., Anciaux, K., Verboven, P., Meuldermans, W., & Lavrijsen, K. (2001). Strategies for Absorption Screening in Drug Discovery and Development. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.2174/1568026013394886

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.