The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In-Silico ADME Models: A General Assessment of their Utility in Drug Discovery Applications
Abstract
ADME prediction is an extremely challenging area as many of the properties we try to predict are a result of multiple physiological processes. In this review we consider how in-silico predictions of ADME processes can be used to help bias medicinal chemistry into more ideal areas of property space, minimizing the number of compounds needed to be synthesized to obtain the required biochemical/physico-chemical profile. While such models are not sufficiently accurate to act as a replacement for in-vivo or in-vitro methods, in-silico methods nevertheless can help us to understand the underlying physico-chemical dependencies of the different ADME properties, and thus can give us inspiration on how to optimize them. Many global in-silico ADME models (i.e generated on large, diverse datasets) have been reported in the literature. In this paper we selectively review representatives from each distinct class and discuss their relative utility in drug discovery. For each ADME parameter, we limit our discussion to the most recent, most predictive or most insightful examples in the literature to highlight the current state of the art. In each case we briefly summarize the different types of models available for each parameter (i.e simple rules, physico-chemical and 3D based QSAR predictions), their overall accuracy and the underlying SAR. We also discuss the utility of the models as related to lead generation and optimization phases of discovery research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Computational Modeling of β-Secretase 1 (BACE-1) Inhibitors Using Ligand Based Approaches
Subramanian, G., Ramsundar, B., Pande, V., & Denny, R. A. (2016) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00290 · Cited by 285
Lagorce, D., Douguet, D., Miteva, M. A., & Villoutreix, B. O. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep46277 · Cited by 266
Bayer’s in silico ADMET platform: a journey of machine learning over the past two decades
Göller, A. H., Kuhnke, L., Montanari, F., Bonin, A., Schneckener, S., ter Laak, A., Wichard, J., Lobell, M., & Hillisch, A. (2020) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2020.07.001 · Cited by 215
Davies, M., Jones, R. D. O., Grime, K., Jansson-Löfmark, R., Fretland, A. J., Winiwarter, S., Morgan, P., & McGinnity, D. F. (2020) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2020.03.004 · Cited by 123
Kaserer, T., Temml, V., Kutil, Z., Vanek, T., Landa, P., & Schuster, D. (2015) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.04.017 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Paul Gleeson, M., Hersey, A., & Hannongbua, S.
- Venue
- Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2011-02-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 358-381
- ISSN
- 1568-0266 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2155862582
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In-Silico ADME Models: A General Assessment of their Utility in Drug Discovery Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2174/156802611794480927
- The paper
- Paul Gleeson, M., Hersey, A., & Hannongbua, S. (2011). In-Silico ADME Models: A General Assessment of their Utility in Drug Discovery Applications. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.2174/156802611794480927
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.