The DOI matches its Crossref record; 230 of the 231 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
General Theory for Multiple Input-Output Perturbations in Complex Molecular Systems. 1. Linear QSPR Electronegativity Models in Physical, Organic, and Medicinal Chemistry
Abstract
In general perturbation methods starts with a known exact solution of a problem and add "small" variation terms in order to approach to a solution for a related problem without known exact solution. Perturbation theory has been widely used in almost all areas of science. Bhor's quantum model, Heisenberg's matrix mechanincs, Feyman diagrams, and Poincare's chaos model or "butterfly effect" in complex systems are examples of perturbation theories. On the other hand, the study of Quantitative Structure-Property Relationships (QSPR) in molecular complex systems is an ideal area for the application of perturbation theory. There are several problems with exact experimental solutions (new chemical reactions, physicochemical properties, drug activity and distribution, metabolic networks, etc.) in public databases like CHEMBL. However, in all these cases, we have an even larger list of related problems without known solutions. We need to know the change in all these properties after a perturbation of initial boundary conditions. It means, when we test large sets of similar, but different, compounds and/or chemical reactions under the slightly different conditions (temperature, time, solvents, enzymes, assays, protein targets, tissues, partition systems, organisms, etc.). However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no QSPR general-purpose perturbation theory to solve this problem. In this work, firstly we review general aspects and applications of both perturbation theory and QSPR models. Secondly, we formulate a general-purpose perturbation theory for multiple-boundary QSPR problems. Last, we develop three new QSPR-Perturbation theory models. The first model classify correctly >100,000 pairs of intra-molecular carbolithiations with 75-95% of Accuracy (Ac), Sensitivity (Sn), and Specificity (Sp). The model predicts probabilities of variations in the yield and enantiomeric excess of reactions due to at least one perturbation in boundary conditions (solvent, temperature, temperature of addition, or time of reaction). The model also account for changes in chemical structure (connectivity structure and/or chirality paterns in substrate, product, electrophile agent, organolithium, and ligand of the asymmetric catalyst). The second model classifies more than 150,000 cases with 85-100% of Ac, Sn, and Sp. The data contains experimental shifts in up to 18 different pharmacological parameters determined in >3000 assays of ADMET (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Elimination, and Toxicity) properties and/or interactions between 31723 drugs and 100 targets (metabolizing enzymes, drug transporters, or organisms). The third model classifies more than 260,000 cases of perturbations in the self-aggregation of drugs and surfactants to form micelles with Ac, Sn, and Sp of 94-95%. The model predicts changes in 8 physicochemical and/or thermodynamics output parameters (critic micelle concentration, aggregation number, degree of ionization, surface area, enthalpy, free energy, entropy, heat capacity) of self-aggregation due to perturbations. The perturbations refers to changes in initial temperature, solvent, salt, salt concentration, solvent, and/or structure of the anion or cation of more than 150 different drugs and surfactants. QSPR-Perturbation Theory models may be useful for multi-objective optimization of organic synthesis, physicochemical properties, biological activity, metabolism, and distribution profiles towards the design of new drugs, surfactants, asymmetric ligands for catalysts, and other materials.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“More recently, Gonzalez-Diaz et al.109 developed the perturbation theory machine learning (PTML) methods that search for QSAR models capable of simultaneous prediction of many target properties under several experimental conditions.”
From QSAR without borders (2020) · cites this paper as [109]
Citations
Cites
Note on an Approximation Treatment for Many-Electron Systems
MØLLER, C. K., & PLESSET, M. S. (1934) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.46.618 · Cited by 14,602
CHARMM‐GUI: A web‐based graphical user interface for CHARMM
Jo, S., Kim, T., Iyer, V. G., & Im, W. (2008) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20945 · Cited by 9,284
Whitesides, G. M., & Grzybowski, B. A. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1070821 · Cited by 7,550
ChEMBL: a large-scale bioactivity database for drug discovery
Gaulton, A., Bellis, L. J., Bento, A. P., Chambers, J., Davies, M., Hersey, A., Light, Y., McGlinchey, S., Michalovich, D., Al-Lazikani, B., et al. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr777 · Cited by 4,382
Comprehensive asymmetric catalysis
Jacobsen, E. N., Pfaltz, A., & 山本, 尚. (1999) · Springer eBooks · Cited by 3,786
CHARMM-GUI Membrane Builder for mixed bilayers and its application to yeast membranes.
Jo, S., Lim, J. B., Klauda, J. B., & Im, W. (2009) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2009.04.013 · Cited by 1,674
Virtual Computational Chemistry Laboratory – Design and Description
Tetko, I. V., Gasteiger, J., Todeschini, R., Mauri, A., Livingstone, D. J., Ertl, P., Palyulin, V. A., Radchenko, E. V., Zefirov, N. S., Makarenko, A. S., et al. (2005) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-005-8694-y · Cited by 1,504
Chou, K., & Shen, H. (2008) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.494 · Cited by 1,226
Vilar, S., Cozza, G., & Moro, S. (2008) · Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/156802608786786624 · Cited by 1,200
Statistics: Methods and Applications
Hill, T. E. (2005) · Cited by 1,074
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–101 of 101
Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Drug-Like Molecules Targeting Calmodulin Pathway Proteins
Marchueta, M. B., López, N., M‐Alicante, S., Barbolla, I., Ibarluzea, M. G., Ramis, R., Salomon, A. M., Muguruza‐Montero, A., Núñez, E., Leonardo, A., et al. (2025) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.5c02111
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gonzalez-Diaz, H., Arrasate, S., Gomez-SanJuan, A., Sotomayor, N., Lete, E., Besada-Porto, L., & Ruso, J.
- Venue
- Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2013-08-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1713-1741
- ISSN
- 1568-0266 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2137226045
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 231
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6
- FWCI
- 9.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics › Graph theory and applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Keywords
- QSPR, perturbation theory, electronegativity, carbolithiation, organolithium reactions, asymmetric catalysis, enantiomeric excess, reaction yield prediction, molecular descriptors, drug activity prediction, metabolic networks, drug repurposing
- MeSH terms
- Chemistry, Pharmaceutical, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Models, Molecular, Proteins, Quantum Theory, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review