The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Antimicrobial Peptide Structure and Mechanism of Action: A Focus on the Role of Membrane Structure
Abstract
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are showing increasing promise as potential candidate antibacterial drugs in the face of the rapidly emerging bacterial resistance to conventional antibiotics in recent years. The target of these peptides is the microbial membrane and there are numerous models to explain their mechanism of action ranging from pore formation to general membrane disruption. The interaction between the AMP and the target membrane is critical to the specificity and activity of these peptides. However, a precise understanding of the relationship between antimicrobial peptide structure and their cytolytic function in a range of organisms is still lacking. This is a result of the complex nature of the interactions of AMPs with the cell membrane, the mechanism of which can vary considerably between different classes of antimicrobia peptides. A wide range of biophysical techniques have been used to study the influence of a number of peptide and membrane properties on the cytolytic activity of these peptides in model membrane systems. Central to characterisation of this interaction is a quantitative analysis of the binding of peptide to the membrane and the coherent dynamic changes in membrane structure. Recently, dual polarization interferometry has been used to perform an in depth analysis of antimicrobial peptide induced membrane perturbation and with new mass-structure co-fitting kinetic analysis have allowed a real-time label free analysis of binding affinity and kinetics. We review these studies which describe multi-step mechanisms which are adopted by various AMPs in nature and may advance our approach to the development of a new generation of effective antimicrobial therapeutics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kumar, P., Kizhakkedathu, J., & Straus, S. (2018) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom8010004 · Cited by 1,227
Antimicrobial peptides: mechanism of action, activity and clinical potential
Zhang, Q.-Y., Yan, Z.-B., Meng, Y.-M., Hong, X.-Y., Shao, G., Ma, J.-J., Cheng, X.-R., Liu, J., Kang, J., & Fu, C.-Y. (2021) · Military Medical Research · doi:10.1186/s40779-021-00343-2 · Cited by 1,065
Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections
(2021) · Indian Journal of Continuing Nursing Education · doi:10.4103/2230-7354.320831 · Cited by 855
Gan, B. H., Gaynord, J., Rowe, S. M., Deingruber, T., & Spring, D. R. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00729c · Cited by 511
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs): A promising class of antimicrobial compounds
Erdem Büyükkiraz, M., & Kesmen, Z. (2022) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/jam.15314 · Cited by 454
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, T.-H., N. Hall, K., & Aguilar, M.-I.
- Venue
- Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2015-09-16
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-39
- ISSN
- 1568-0266 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161647621
- Cited by
- 512
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antimicrobial Peptide Structure and Mechanism of Action: A Focus on the Role of Membrane Structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2174/1568026615666150703121700
- The paper
- Lee, T.-H., N. Hall, K., & Aguilar, M.-I. (2015). Antimicrobial Peptide Structure and Mechanism of Action: A Focus on the Role of Membrane Structure. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.2174/1568026615666150703121700
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.