Potential fatty acid as antibacterial agent against oral bacteria of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguinis from Basil (Ocimum americanum): in vitro and in silico studies.
Abstract
Background: Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguinis are Gram-positive bacteria that cause dental caries. MurA enzyme acts as a catalyst in the formation of peptidoglycan in bacterial cell walls, making it ideal as an antibacterial target. Basil (Ocimum americanum) is an edible plant that is diverse and has been used as a herbal medicine for a long time. It has been reported that basil has a pharmacological effect as well as antibacterial activity. The purpose of this study was to identify antibacterial compounds in O. americanum and analyze their inhibition activity on MurA enzyme. Methods: Fresh leaves from O. americanum extracted with n-hexane and purified by a combination of column chromatography on normal and reverse phase together with guided by in vitro bioactivity assay against S. mutans ATCC 25175 and S. sanguinis ATCC 10556, respectively, while in silico molecular docking simulation of lauric acid (1) using PyRx 0.8. Results: The structure determination of antibacterial compound by spectroscopic methods resulted in an active compound 1 as lauric acid. The in vitro evaluation of antibacterial activity compound 1 showed the MIC and MBC of 78.13 & 156.3 ppm and 1250 & 2500 ppm against S. sanguinis and in S. mutans, respectively. Further analysis in silico evaluation as MurA Enzyme inhibitor, lauric acid (1) has a binding affinity of -5.2 Kcal/mol those higher than fosfomycin. Conclusion: Lauric acid showed the potential as a new natural antibacterial agent through MurA inhibition in bacterial cell wall biosynthesis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In silico studies propose lauric acid as a natural antibacterial agent via inhibiting the MurA enzyme involved in bacterial cell wall biosynthesis.
“In some in silico studies, LA has been proposed as a natural antibacterial agent via inhibiting the MurA enzyme, which is involved in bacterial cell wall biosynthesis (Heriyati et al., 2020).”
From Insect Derived Lauric Acid as Promising Alternative Strategy to Antibiotics in the Antimicrobial Resistance Scenario (2021) · cites this paper as Heriyati et al., 2020
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20 · Cited by 21
- Authors
- Herdiyati, Y., Astrid, Y., Shadrina, A. A. N., Wiani, I., Satari, M. H., & Kurnia, D.
- Affiliations
- Padjadjaran University (ID)
- Corresponding author
- Kurnia, Dikdik
- Venue
- Current Drug Discovery Technologies
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2021-07
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 532-541
- ISSN
- 1570-1638 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3040709911
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 1.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Drug Discovery Technologies (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants
- Keywords
- lauric acid, Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguinis, antibacterial activity, dental caries, Ocimum basilicum, Ocimum americanum, peptidoglycan biosynthesis, natural antibacterial agents, minimum inhibitory concentration, molecular docking
- MeSH terms
- Anti-Bacterial Agents, Dental Caries, Humans, Lauric Acids, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguis, Plant Leaves, Ocimum basilicum, Alkyl and Aryl Transferases, Molecular Docking Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review