Cited by 21Essential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityOral microbiology and periodontitis researchPhytochemicals and Medicinal Plants

Potential fatty acid as antibacterial agent against oral bacteria of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguinis from Basil (Ocimum americanum): in vitro and in silico studies.

Herdiyati, Yetty, Astrid, Yonada, Shadrina, Aldina Amalia Nur, Wiani, Ika, Satari, Mieke Hemiawati, Kurnia, Dikdik·2021·Current Drug Discovery Technologies

Abstract

Background: Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguinis are Gram-positive bacteria that cause dental caries. MurA enzyme acts as a catalyst in the formation of peptidoglycan in bacterial cell walls, making it ideal as an antibacterial target. Basil (Ocimum americanum) is an edible plant that is diverse and has been used as a herbal medicine for a long time. It has been reported that basil has a pharmacological effect as well as antibacterial activity. The purpose of this study was to identify antibacterial compounds in O. americanum and analyze their inhibition activity on MurA enzyme. Methods: Fresh leaves from O. americanum extracted with n-hexane and purified by a combination of column chromatography on normal and reverse phase together with guided by in vitro bioactivity assay against S. mutans ATCC 25175 and S. sanguinis ATCC 10556, respectively, while in silico molecular docking simulation of lauric acid (1) using PyRx 0.8. Results: The structure determination of antibacterial compound by spectroscopic methods resulted in an active compound 1 as lauric acid. The in vitro evaluation of antibacterial activity compound 1 showed the MIC and MBC of 78.13 & 156.3 ppm and 1250 & 2500 ppm against S. sanguinis and in S. mutans, respectively. Further analysis in silico evaluation as MurA Enzyme inhibitor, lauric acid (1) has a binding affinity of -5.2 Kcal/mol those higher than fosfomycin. Conclusion: Lauric acid showed the potential as a new natural antibacterial agent through MurA inhibition in bacterial cell wall biosynthesis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/1570163817666200712171652

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 21

Authors
Herdiyati, Y., Astrid, Y., Shadrina, A. A. N., Wiani, I., Satari, M. H., & Kurnia, D.
Affiliations
Padjadjaran University (ID)
Corresponding author
Kurnia, Dikdik
Venue
Current Drug Discovery Technologies
Published
2021-07
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
532-541
ISSN
1570-1638 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3040709911
Cited by
21
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Drug Discovery Technologies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants
Keywords
lauric acid, Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguinis, antibacterial activity, dental caries, Ocimum basilicum, Ocimum americanum, peptidoglycan biosynthesis, natural antibacterial agents, minimum inhibitory concentration, molecular docking
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, Dental Caries, Humans, Lauric Acids, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguis, Plant Leaves, Ocimum basilicum, Alkyl and Aryl Transferases, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review