Cited by 7Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Reducing the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes - Early Identification of High-Risk Individuals and Treatment with Acarbose

Pan, Chang-Yu·2007·Current Diabetes Reviews

Abstract

The severity of the type 2 diabetes epidemic is widely acknowledged. Demographic, social, and cultural changes around the world are driving a dramatic increase in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes. Consequently, there is increasing interest in defining the target population and developing strategies for preventing or delaying the disease. Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), an asymptomatic condition early in the disease continuum of dysglycemia, is the best target for intervention, as it is a strong predictor for the development of both type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Identifying individuals likely to have IGT using risk-prediction tools is simple and cost-effective; diagnosis can be confirmed with an oral glucose tolerance test. Numerous trials have examined the benefits of intervention in IGT populations. Lifestyle modification and some pharmacologic therapies, such as acarbose, have been shown to significantly reduce disease progression. Acarbose therapy has also been associated with significant reductions in cardiovascular events and new cases of hypertension. Trials assessing the potential preventive effects of various therapies are ongoing, but current evidence confirms that early intervention in individuals with IGT can reduce the risks of type 2 diabetes and CVD. Identification of high-risk individuals should therefore be standard in general practice and, if IGT is diagnosed, therapeutic intervention should be initiated promptly.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/157339907780598243

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pan, C.-Y.
Venue
Current Diabetes Reviews
Published
2007-05-01
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
141-148
ISSN
1573-3998 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061182770
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Diabetes Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
General Hospital of People’s Liberation Army
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
type 2 diabetes prevention, impaired glucose tolerance, acarbose, risk prediction, oral glucose tolerance test, lifestyle modification, cardiovascular risk, hypertension, disease progression
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Geography, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Time Factors, Glucose Intolerance, Acarbose, Risk Reduction Behavior, Early Diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review