The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reducing the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes - Early Identification of High-Risk Individuals and Treatment with Acarbose
Abstract
The severity of the type 2 diabetes epidemic is widely acknowledged. Demographic, social, and cultural changes around the world are driving a dramatic increase in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes. Consequently, there is increasing interest in defining the target population and developing strategies for preventing or delaying the disease. Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), an asymptomatic condition early in the disease continuum of dysglycemia, is the best target for intervention, as it is a strong predictor for the development of both type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Identifying individuals likely to have IGT using risk-prediction tools is simple and cost-effective; diagnosis can be confirmed with an oral glucose tolerance test. Numerous trials have examined the benefits of intervention in IGT populations. Lifestyle modification and some pharmacologic therapies, such as acarbose, have been shown to significantly reduce disease progression. Acarbose therapy has also been associated with significant reductions in cardiovascular events and new cases of hypertension. Trials assessing the potential preventive effects of various therapies are ongoing, but current evidence confirms that early intervention in individuals with IGT can reduce the risks of type 2 diabetes and CVD. Identification of high-risk individuals should therefore be standard in general practice and, if IGT is diagnosed, therapeutic intervention should be initiated promptly.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“but also induce gastrointestinal side effects that limit their use in a preventive approach [16].”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Beejmohun, V., Peytavy-Izard, M., Mignon, C., Muscente-Paque, D., Deplanque, X., Ripoll, C., & Chapal, N. (2014) · BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1186/1472-6882-14-351 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Pan, C.-Y.
- Venue
- Current Diabetes Reviews
- Publisher
- Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2007-05-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 141-148
- ISSN
- 1573-3998 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2061182770
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Diabetes Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- General Hospital of People’s Liberation Army
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes prevention, impaired glucose tolerance, acarbose, risk prediction, oral glucose tolerance test, lifestyle modification, cardiovascular risk, hypertension, disease progression
- MeSH terms
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Geography, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Time Factors, Glucose Intolerance, Acarbose, Risk Reduction Behavior, Early Diagnosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review