Cited by 43Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and ResearchAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare

Contemporary roles of the pediatric psychologist in diabetes care

Kichler, Jessica, Harris, Michael, Weissberg-Benchell, Jill·2015·Current Diabetes Reviews

Abstract

Important stakeholders, including the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the International Society of Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD), recognize the need for psychologists to be an integral part of diabetes care. This review paper aims to provide a comprehensive examination of pediatric psychologists' roles in working with children and adolescents with diabetes, including during distinct phases of treatment (e.g., diagnosis, outpatient diabetes clinic visits, inpatient hospitalizations, and outpatient psychology visits) and with different modalities of psychological interventions (e.g., screening, individual, family, and group therapy). In addition, the role of the psychologist in diabetes care within various settings (e.g., private practice, academic medical centers, and community organizations) will be explored. Finally, this paper will outline other roles in which psychologists contribute to diabetes-specific efforts (e.g., translational research, program development in transition to adult care, advocacy for health care reform initiatives, health care billing/reimbursement, and alternative methods to psychosocial care delivery) as well as future directions for working with children and adolescents with diabetes. Pediatric psychologists have multiple professional roles in a wide variety of settings; however, there is more that can be done in the future to fully utilize pediatric psychologists in diabetes care for children and adolescents, such as embedding psychologists into integrated clinic visits where families receive comprehensive medical and psychological services to support overall health and well-being. Therefore, there is a need for increased advocacy to obtain even more pediatric psychology engagement in diabetes care to provide new clinical services and develop more translational research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/1573399811666150421104449

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kichler, J., Harris, M., & Weissberg-Benchell, J.
Affiliations
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Venue
Current Diabetes Reviews
Published
2015-07-29
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
210-221
ISSN
1573-3998 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2269028355
Cited by
43
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Diabetes Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Keywords
pediatric psychologists, pediatric diabetes, children and adolescents with diabetes, psychological intervention, diabetes screening, family therapy, group therapy, transition to adult care, translational research
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Age Factors, Child, Child Behavior, Combined Modality Therapy, Cooperative Behavior, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Patient Care Team, Health Behavior, Treatment Outcome, Patient-Centered Care, Professional Role, Interdisciplinary Communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review