Cited by 55

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Systematic Review of Evidence on the Use of Very Low Calorie Diets in People with Diabetes

Sellahewa, Luckni, Khan, Corniche, Lakkunarajah, Sindujah, Idris, Iskandar·2016·Current Diabetes Reviews

Abstract

Background Recent interest has emerged regarding the effects of Very Low Calorie Diet (VLCD) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). We therefore performed a systematic review to investigate the effects of VLCD on HbA1c, weight and cardiovascular risk profile outcomes as well as its safety and tolerability among people with T2D. Methods We conducted searches of Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Centre for reviews and Dissemination databases, Medline, Embase, Pubmed, Web of Science, Web of Knowledge and Turning Research into Practice (TRIP) as well as ongoing trial resources. We included all studies involving VLCD and diabetes published until December 2013. Outcome measures include weight, HbA1c, fasting glucose, fasting insulin, lipid profile, blood pressure, safety and drop out rates. Results 17 studies were included in the systematic review. Duration of VLCD duration ranged from 5 days to 6 months and duration of follow up ranged from 8 days to 5 years. The age range was 14 years to 59 years of age. Mean weight loss was 13.2kg, ranging from 4.1 to 24kg. Mean Hba1c reduction was 1.4% (ranging between 0.1 to 3.1% reduction across different studies). Three studies reported a significant reduction in the daily doses of insulin. All studies which reported cardiovascular risk profile showed a significant decrease in total cholesterol, systolic and diastolic blood pressure post VLCD. Apart from two studies, all of the other studies showed that the decrease in blood pressure a…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/1573399812666151005123431

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 55

Metadata

Authors
Sellahewa, L., Khan, C., Lakkunarajah, S., & Idris, I.
Venue
Current Diabetes Reviews
Published
2016-12-14
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
35-46
ISSN
1573-3998
Cited by
55
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review