Cited by 29Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Neuropsychological Findings in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and its Potential Implications for Treatment

Fontenelle, Leonardo, Mendlowicz, Mauro, Mattos, Paulo, Versiani, Marcio·2006·Current Psychiatry Reviews

Abstract

Neuropsychological studies have shed light on several important aspects of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Along with neuroimaging and information processing approaches, it has contributed to delineate some of the most instigating pathophysiological models of OCD and to strengthen its diagnostic validity. Lately, neuropsychological studies have also emerged as a potentially relevant research area for therapeutics. In this review, we described the nature of the executive dysfunctions associated with OCD and theorized how they may account for the characteristic memory and visuoconstructive/visuospatial impairments found in patients suffering from this disorder. We also examined the concepts of implicit memory, meta-memory, memory for actions, memory bias, reality monitoring, and the multiple ways these functions may be altered in patients with OCD. The role of cognitive dysfunctions as potential predictors of treatment response to either pharmacological approaches (e.g. serotonin reuptake inhibitors) or to cognitive-behavior therapies (i.e. exposure and response prevention) in patients with OCD was also discussed. Finally, we argued that cognition might be an area of particular vulnerability to the negative effects of the anti-obsessional drugs and of the neuroanatomically-based approaches (neurosurgery and deep-brain stimulation). Keywords: frontal lobes, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, Trail making test, Memory, visuoconstructive function, Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Neurosurgery

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/157340006775101454

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The incessant repetition of these acts and the absence of clear feedback on whether or not the act has been performed would very quickly prevent the patient from knowing whether or not the act has actually been carried out.

    “Unfortunately, the incessant repetition of these acts and the absence of clear feedback on whether or not the act has been performed would then very quickly prevent the patient from knowing whether or not the act has actually been carried out [70].”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fontenelle, L., Mendlowicz, M., Mattos, P., & Versiani, M.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
  • Universidade Federal Fluminense (BR)
Venue
Current Psychiatry Reviews
Published
2006-02-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
11-26
ISSN
1573-4005 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2112833015
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Psychiatry Reviews (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, executive dysfunction, memory impairment, implicit memory, metamemory, action memory, memory bias, reality monitoring, treatment response prediction, serotonin reuptake inhibitors, cognitive behavioral therapy, exposure and response prevention, deep brain stimulation, frontal lobe dysfunction, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, Trail Making Test

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review