Cited by 102Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDiabetes Treatment and ManagementNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Incretin Analogues that have been Developed to Treat Type 2 Diabetes Hold Promise as a Novel Treatment Strategy for Alzheimers Disease

Holscher, Christian·2010·Recent Patents on CNS Drug Discovery

Abstract

Analogues of the incretins Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and Glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) have been developed to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus. They are protease resistant and have a longer biological half life than the native peptides. Some of these novel analogues can cross the blood-brain barrier, have neuroprotective effects, activate neuronal stem cells in the brain, and can improve cognition. The receptors for GIP and GLP-1 are expressed in neurons, and both GIP and GLP-1 are expressed and released as transmitters by neurons. GIP analogues such as DAla(2)GIP and GLP-1 analogues such as liraglutide enhance synaptic plasticity in the brain and also reverse the betaamyloid induced impairment of synaptic plasticity. In mouse models of Alzheimer's disease, GLP-1 analogues Val(8)GLP-1 and liraglutide prevent memory impairment and the block of synaptic plasticity in the brain. Since two GLP- 1 analogues exendin-4 (Exenatide, Byetta) and liraglutide (Victoza) are already on the market as treatments for Type 2 diabetes, and others are in late stage clinical trials, these drugs show promise as treatments for neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease. Currently, there are three patents covering native GLP-1 and different GLP-1 analogues and one patent for the use of GIP and different GIP analogues for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/157488910791213130

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holscher, C.
Venue
Recent Patents on CNS Drug Discovery
Published
2010-06-01
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
109-117
ISSN
1574-8898 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041102868
Cited by
102
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
FWCI
7.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Recent Patents on CNS Drug Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
incretin analogues, Alzheimer's disease, type 2 diabetes, GLP-1 receptor, GIP receptor, liraglutide, exenatide, synaptic plasticity, amyloid-beta, neuroprotection, neuronal stem cells, memory impairment, blood-brain barrier, patents
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Blood-Brain Barrier, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide, Humans, Models, Neurological, Molecular Sequence Data, Patents as Topic, Neuroprotective Agents, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1, Incretins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review